Published online before print
May 10, 2007, 10.1101/gr.6438607
Genome Res. 17:1034-1044, 2007
©2007 by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; ISSN 1088-9051/07 $5.00
OPEN ACCESS ARTICLE
Letter
Three distinct modes of intron dynamics in the evolution of eukaryotes
Liran Carmel,
Yuri I. Wolf,
Igor B. Rogozin, and
Eugene V. Koonin1
National Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20894, USA
Several contrasting scenarios have been proposed for the origin and evolution of spliceosomal introns, a hallmark of eukaryotic genes. A comprehensive probabilistic model to obtain a definitive reconstruction of intron evolution was developed and applied to 391 sets of conserved genes from 19 eukaryotic species. It is inferred that a relatively high intron density was reached early, i.e., the last common ancestor of eukaryotes contained >2.15 introns/kilobase, and the last common ancestor of multicellular life forms harbored 3.4 introns/kilobase, a greater intron density than in most of the extant fungi and in some animals. The rates of intron gain and intron loss appear to have been dropping during the last 1.3 billion years, with the decline in the gain rate being much steeper. Eukaryotic lineages exhibit three distinct modes of evolution of the intronexon structure. The primary, balanced mode, apparently, operates in all lineages. In this mode, intron gain and loss are strongly and positively correlated, in contrast to previous reports on inverse correlation between these processes. The second mode involves an elevated rate of intron loss and is prevalent in several lineages, such as fungi and insects. The third mode, characterized by elevated rate of intron gain, is seen only in deep branches of the tree, indicating that bursts of intron invasion occurred at key points in eukaryotic evolution, such as the origin of animals. Intron dynamics could depend on multiple mechanisms, and in the balanced mode, gain and loss of introns might share common mechanistic features.
1 Corresponding author.
E-mail koonin{at}ncbi.nlm.nih.gov; fax (301) 480-9241.
[Supplemental material is available online at www.genome.org.]
Article published online before print. Article and publication date are at http://www.genome.org/cgi/doi/10.1101/gr.6438607

CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Csuros
Malin: maximum likelihood analysis of intron evolution in eukaryotes
Bioinformatics,
July 1, 2008;
24(13):
1538 - 1539.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Tarrio, F. J. Ayala, and F. Rodriguez-Trelles
From the Cover: Alternative splicing: A missing piece in the puzzle of intron gain
PNAS,
May 20, 2008;
105(20):
7223 - 7228.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
V. Krauss, C. Thummler, F. Georgi, J. Lehmann, P. F. Stadler, and C. Eisenhardt
Near Intron Positions Are Reliable Phylogenetic Markers: An Application to Holometabolous Insects
Mol. Biol. Evol.,
May 1, 2008;
25(5):
821 - 830.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Csuros, I. B. Rogozin, and E. V. Koonin
Extremely Intron-Rich Genes in the Alveolate Ancestors Inferred with a Flexible Maximum-Likelihood Approach
Mol. Biol. Evol.,
May 1, 2008;
25(5):
903 - 911.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. W. Roy and M. Irimia
Rare Genomic Characters Do Not Support Coelomata: Intron Loss/Gain
Mol. Biol. Evol.,
April 1, 2008;
25(4):
620 - 623.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Irimia and S. W. Roy
Spliceosomal introns as tools for genomic and evolutionary analysis
Nucleic Acids Res.,
March 1, 2008;
36(5):
1703 - 1712.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. K. Basu, L. Carmel, I. B. Rogozin, and E. V. Koonin
Evolution of protein domain promiscuity in eukaryotes
Genome Res.,
March 1, 2008;
18(3):
449 - 461.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y.-H. Loh, S. Brenner, and B. Venkatesh
Investigation of Loss and Gain of Introns in the Compact Genomes of Pufferfishes (Fugu and Tetraodon)
Mol. Biol. Evol.,
March 1, 2008;
25(3):
526 - 535.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Schwartz, J. Silva, D. Burstein, T. Pupko, E. Eyras, and G. Ast
Large-scale comparative analysis of splicing signals and their corresponding splicing factors in eukaryotes
Genome Res.,
January 1, 2008;
18(1):
88 - 103.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. K. Basu, I. B. Rogozin, O. Deusch, T. Dagan, W. Martin, and E. V. Koonin
Evolutionary Dynamics of Introns in Plastid-Derived Genes in Plants: Saturation Nearly Reached but Slow Intron Gain Continues
Mol. Biol. Evol.,
January 1, 2008;
25(1):
111 - 119.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Zheng, I. B. Rogozin, E. V. Koonin, and T. M. Przytycka
Support for the Coelomata Clade of Animals from a Rigorous Analysis of the Pattern of Intron Conservation
Mol. Biol. Evol.,
November 1, 2007;
24(11):
2583 - 2592.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. W. Roy and D. Penny
Widespread Intron Loss Suggests Retrotransposon Activity in Ancient Apicomplexans
Mol. Biol. Evol.,
September 1, 2007;
24(9):
1926 - 1933.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. Carmel, I. B. Rogozin, Y. I. Wolf, and E. V. Koonin
Evolutionarily conserved genes preferentially accumulate introns
Genome Res.,
July 1, 2007;
17(7):
1045 - 1050.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|