Genome Research

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print September 5, 2006, 10.1101/gr.5282906
Genome Res. 16:1252-1261, 2006
©2006 by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; ISSN 1088-9051/06 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
gr.5282906v1
16/10/1252    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hawkins, J. S.
Right arrow Articles by Wendel, J. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hawkins, J. S.
Right arrow Articles by Wendel, J. F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Letter

Differential lineage-specific amplification of transposable elements is responsible for genome size variation in Gossypium

Jennifer S. Hawkins1, HyeRan Kim2, John D. Nason1, Rod A. Wing2 and Jonathan F. Wendel1,3

1Iowa State University, Department of Ecology, Evolution and Organismal Biology, Ames, Iowa 50011, USA; 2University of Arizona, Department of Plant Sciences, Arizona Genomics Institute, Tucson, Arizona 85721, USA

The DNA content of eukaryotic nuclei (C-value) varies ~200,000-fold, but there is only a ~20-fold variation in the number of protein-coding genes. Hence, most C-value variation is ascribed to the repetitive fraction, although little is known about the evolutionary dynamics of the specific components that lead to genome size variation. To understand the modes and mechanisms that underlie variation in genome composition, we generated sequence data from whole genome shotgun (WGS) libraries for three representative diploid (n = 13) members of Gossypium that vary in genome size from 880 to 2460 Mb (1C) and from a phylogenetic outgroup, Gossypioides kirkii, with an estimated genome size of 588 Mb. Copy number estimates including all dispersed repetitive sequences indicate that 40%–65% of each genome is composed of transposable elements. Inspection of individual sequence types revealed differential, lineage-specific expansion of various families of transposable elements among the different plant lineages. Copia-like retrotransposable element sequences have differentially accumulated in the Gossypium species with the smallest genome, G. raimondii, while gypsy-like sequences have proliferated in the lineages with larger genomes. Phylogenetic analyses demonstrated a pattern of lineage-specific amplification of particular subfamilies of retrotransposons within each species studied. One particular group of gypsy-like retrotransposon sequences, Gorge3 (Gossypium retrotransposable gypsy-like element), appears to have undergone a massive proliferation in two plant lineages, accounting for a major fraction of genome-size change. Like maize, Gossypium has undergone a threefold increase in genome size due to the accumulation of LTR retrotransposons over the 5–10 Myr since its origin.


1 Corresponding author.

E-mail jfw{at}iastate.edu; fax (515) 294-1337.

The sequence data described in this paper have been submitted to the GSS Division of GenBank under accessions DX390732–DX406528.

Article published online before print. Article and publication date are at http://www.genome.org/cgi/doi/10.1101/gr.5282906.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
C. E. Grover, Y. Yu, R. A. Wing, A. H. Paterson, and J. F. Wendel
A Phylogenetic Analysis of Indel Dynamics in the Cotton Genus
Mol. Biol. Evol., July 1, 2008; 25(7): 1415 - 1428.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
Z. J. Chen, B. E. Scheffler, E. Dennis, B. A. Triplett, T. Zhang, W. Guo, X. Chen, D. M. Stelly, P. D. Rabinowicz, C. D. Town, et al.
Toward Sequencing Cotton (Gossypium) Genomes
Plant Physiology, December 1, 2007; 145(4): 1303 - 1310.
[Full Text] [PDF]




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Genes Dev. Learn. Mem.
Protein Science RNA Genome Res.
Copyright © 2006 by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.