This Article Full Text (PDF) Supplemental Research Data All Versions of this Article: gr.6775107v1 17/11/1603    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Gordon, L. Articles by Stubbs, L. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Gordon, L. Articles by Stubbs, L. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Letter

Comparative analysis of chicken chromosome 28 provides new clues to the evolutionary fragility of gene-rich vertebrate regions

¹ Genome Biology Group, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California 94550, USA; ² Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute, Walnut Creek, California 94598, USA; ³ Wageningen University, Wageningen 6709 PG, The Netherlands; ⁴ Computations Group, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California 94550, USA

The chicken genome draft sequence has provided a valuable resource for studies of an important agricultural and experimental model species and an important data set for comparative analysis. However, some of the most gene-rich segments are missing from chicken genome draft assemblies, limiting the analysis of a substantial number of genes and preventing a closer look at regions that are especially prone to syntenic rearrangements. To facilitate the functional and evolutionary analysis of one especially gene-rich, rearrangement-prone genomic region, we analyzed sequence from BAC clones spanning chicken microchromosome GGA28; as a complement we also analyzed a gene-sparse, stable region from GGA11. In these two regions we documented the conservation and lineage-specific gain and loss of protein-coding genes and precisely mapped the locations of 31 major human-chicken syntenic breakpoints. Altogether, we identified 72 lineage-specific genes, many of which are found at or near syntenic breaks, implicating evolutionary breakpoint regions as major sites of genetic innovation and change. Twenty-two of the 31 breakpoint regions have been reused repeatedly as rearrangement breakpoints in vertebrate evolution. Compared with stable GC-matched regions, GGA28 is highly enriched in CpG islands, as are break-prone intervals identified elsewhere in the chicken genome; evolutionary breakpoints are further enriched in GC content and CpG islands, highlighting a potential role for these features in genome instability. These data support the hypothesis that chromosome rearrangements have not occurred randomly over the course of vertebrate evolution but are focused preferentially within "fragile" regions with unusual DNA sequence characteristics.

⁶ Corresponding author.

E-mail stubbs5{at}llnl.gov; fax (925) 422-2099.

[Supplemental material is available online at www.genome.org.]

Article published online before print. Article and publication date are at http://www.genome.org/cgi/doi/10.1101/gr.6775107

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. T. Sullivan, C. B. Morehouse, NISC Comparative Sequencing Program, and J. W. Thomas Uprobe 2008: an online resource for universal overgo hybridization-based probe retrieval and design Nucleic Acids Res., July 1, 2008; 36(suppl_2): W149 - W153. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. E. Janes, T. Ezaz, J. A. Marshall Graves, and S. V. Edwards Characterization, chromosomal location, and genomic neighborhood of a ratite ortholog of a gene with gonadal expression in mammals Integr. Comp. Biol., April 28, 2008; (2008) icn024v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]