Genome Research Econo tag

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] --
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print February 6, 2007
Genome Research, DOI: 10.1101/gr.5941007
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Research Data
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
gr.5941007v1
17/3/293    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Goios, A.
Right arrow Articles by Amorim, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Goios, A.
Right arrow Articles by Amorim, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Letter

mtDNA phylogeny and evolution of laboratory mouse strains

Ana Goios1,2,6, Luísa Pereira1,3, Molly Bogue4, Vincent Macaulay5, and António Amorim1,2

1 Instituto de Patologia e Imunologia Molecular da Universidade do Porto (IPATIMUP), 4200-465 Porto, Portugal; 2 Faculdade de Ciências da Universidade do Porto, 4099-002 Porto, Portugal; 3 Medical Faculty, University of Porto, 4200-319 Porto, Portugal; 4 The Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, Maine 04609, USA; 5 Department of Statistics, University of Glasgow, G12 8QQ Glasgow, United Kingdom

Inbred mouse strains have been maintained for more than 100 years, and they are thought to be a mixture of four different mouse subspecies. Although genealogies have been established, female inbred mouse phylogenies remain unexplored. By a phylogenetic analysis of newly generated complete mitochondrial DNA sequence data in 16 strains, we show here that all common inbred strains descend from the same Mus musculus domesticus female wild ancestor, and suggest that they present a different mitochondrial evolutionary process than their wild relatives with a faster accumulation of replacement substitutions. Our data complement forthcoming results on resequencing of a group of priority strains, and they follow recent efforts of the Mouse Phenome Project to collect and make publicly available information on various strains.


6 Corresponding author.

E-mail aalmeida{at}ipatimup.pt; fax +351-22-5570799.

[Supplemental material is available online at www.genome.org. The sequence data from this study have been submitted to GenBank under accession nos. EF108330–EF108345.]

Article published online before print. Article and publication date are online at http://www.genome.org/cgi/doi/10.1101/gr.5941007


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Genome Res.Home page
S. Gregorova, P. Divina, R. Storchova, Z. Trachtulec, V. Fotopulosova, K. L. Svenson, L. R. Donahue, B. Paigen, and J. Forejt
Mouse consomic strains: Exploiting genetic divergence between Mus m. musculus and Mus m. domesticus subspecies
Genome Res., March 1, 2008; 18(3): 509 - 515.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] --
Genes Dev. Learn. Mem.
Protein Science RNA Genome Res.
Copyright © 2007 by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.