Genome Research Econo tag

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] --
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print June 29, 2006
Genome Research, DOI: 10.1101/gr.5117706
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Research Data
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
gr.5117706v1
16/8/990    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Björnerfeldt, S.
Right arrow Articles by Vilà, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Björnerfeldt, S.
Right arrow Articles by Vilà, C.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Gene*Genome
*Nucleotide*Protein
Medline Plus Health Information
*Pet Health
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Letter

Relaxation of selective constraint on dog mitochondrial DNA following domestication

Susanne Björnerfeldt1, Matthew T. Webster1,2 and Carles Vilà3

Department of Evolutionary Biology, Uppsala University, SE-752 36 Uppsala, Sweden

The domestication of dogs caused a dramatic change in their way of life compared with that of their ancestor, the gray wolf. We hypothesize that this new life style changed the selective forces that acted upon the species, which in turn had an effect on the dog’s genome. We sequenced the complete mitochondrial DNA genome in 14 dogs, six wolves, and three coyotes. Here we show that dogs have accumulated nonsynonymous changes in mitochondrial genes at a faster rate than wolves, leading to elevated levels of variation in their proteins. This suggests that a major consequence of domestication in dogs was a general relaxation of selective constraint on their mitochondrial genome. If this change also affected other parts of the dog genome, it could have facilitated the generation of novel functional genetic diversity. This diversity could thus have contributed raw material upon which artificial selection has shaped modern breeds and may therefore be an important source of the extreme phenotypic variation present in modern-day dogs.


1 These authors contributed equally to this work.

2 Present address:

Smurfit Institute of Genetics, University of Dublin, Trinity College, Dublin 2, Ireland.

3 Corresponding author.

E-mail carles.vila{at}ebc.uu.se; fax. +46-18-471-6310.

Article published online before print. Article and publication date are at http://www.genome.org/cgi/doi/10.1101/gr.5117706

[Supplemental material is available online at www.genome.org. The sequence data from this study have been submitted to GenBank under accession nos. DQ480489–DQ480511.]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] --
Genes Dev. Learn. Mem.
Protein Science RNA Genome Res.
Copyright © 2006 by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.