Genome Research cityscape

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] --
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print April 2, 2008
Genome Research, DOI: 10.1101/gr.075903.107
ACCEPTED PREPRINT
This Article
ACCEPTED PREPRINT
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Research Data
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
gr.075903.107v1
gr.075903.107v2    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bauters, M.
Right arrow Articles by Froyen, G.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bauters, M.
Right arrow Articles by Froyen, G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Research

Non-recurrent MECP2 duplications mediated by genomic architecture-driven DNA breaks and break-induced replication repair

Marijke Bauters1, Hilde Van Esch2, Michael J. Friez3, Odile Boespflug-Tanguy4, Martin Zenker5, Angela M. Vianna-Morgante6, Carla Rosenberg6, Jaakko Ignatius7, Martine Raynaud8, Karen Hollanders1, Karen Govaerts1, Kris Vandenreijt1, Florence Niel4, Pierre Blanc4, Roger E. Stevenson3, Jean-Pierre Fryns2, Peter Marynen1, Charles E. Schwartz3, and Guy Froyen1,9

1 VIB, K.U.Leuven; 2 University Hospital Gasthuisberg; 3 JC Self Research Institute of Human Genetics; 4 Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Clermont-FD; 5 Institute of Human Genetics Erlangen; 6 University of Sao Paulo; 7 Oulu University Hospital; 8 Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Tours

Recurrent submicroscopic genomic copy number changes are the result of non-allelic homologous recombination (NAHR). Non-recurrent aberrations however, can result from different non-exclusive recombination-repair mechanisms. We previously described small microduplications at Xq28 containing MECP2, in four male patients with a severe neurological phenotype. Here, we report on the fine-mapping and breakpoint analysis of 16 unique microduplications. The size of the overlapping copy number changes varies between 0.3 and 2.3 Mb and FISH analysis on three patients demonstrated a tandem orientation. Although 8 of the 32 breakpoint regions coincide with low-copy repeats (LCRs), none of the duplications are the result of NAHR. Bioinformatics analysis of the breakpoint regions demonstrated a 2.5-fold higher frequency of Alu interspersed repeats as compared to control regions, as well as a very high GC content (53%). Unexpectedly, we obtained the junction in only one patient by long-range PCR, which revealed non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) as the mechanism. Breakpoint analysis in two other patients by inverse PCR and subsequent array-CGH analysis, demonstrated the presence of a second duplicated region more telomeric at Xq28, of which one copy was inserted in between the duplicated MECP2 regions. These data suggest a two-step mechanism in which part of Xq28 is first inserted near the MECP2 locus, followed by breakage-induced replication (BIR) with strand invasion of the normal sister chromatid. Our results demonstrate that the mechanism by which copy number changes occur in regions with a complex genomic architecture, can yield complex rearrangements.


Correspondence: 9 E-mail: guy.froyen{at}med.kuleuven.be


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] --
Genes Dev. Learn. Mem.
Protein Science RNA Genome Res.
Copyright © 2008 by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.