Genome Research scroll

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] --
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print April 1, 2008
Genome Research, DOI: 10.1101/gr.075770.107
ACCEPTED PREPRINT
This Article
ACCEPTED PREPRINT
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Research Data
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
gr.075770.107v1
gr.075770.107v2    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Akagi, K.
Right arrow Articles by Symer, D. E
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Akagi, K.
Right arrow Articles by Symer, D. E
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Research

Extensive variation between inbred mouse strains due to endogenous L1 retrotransposition

Keiko Akagi1, Jingfeng Li1, Robert M Stephens2, Natalia Volfovsky2, and David E Symer1,3

1 National Cancer Institute; 2 National Cancer Institute-Frederick, and Advanced Biomedical Computing Center, SAIC-Frederick

Numerous inbred mouse strains comprise models for human diseases and diversity, but the molecular differences between them are mostly unknown. Several mammalian genomes have been assembled, providing a framework for identifying structural variations. To identify variants between inbred mouse strains at a single nucleotide resolution, we aligned 26 million individual sequence traces from four laboratory mouse strains to the C57BL/6J reference genome. We discovered and analyzed over ten thousand intermediate-length genomic variants (from 100 nucleotides to 10 kilobases) distinguishing these strains from the C57BL/6J reference. Approximately 85% of such variants are due to recent mobilization of endogenous retrotransposons, predominantly L1 elements, greatly exceeding that reported in humans. Many genes' structure and expression are altered directly by polymorphic L1 retrotransposons, including Drosha, Parp8, Scn1a, Arhgap15 and others including novel genes. L1 polymorphisms are distributed non-randomly across the genome, as they are excluded significantly from the X chromosome and from genes associated with the cell cycle, but are enriched in receptor genes. Thus, recent endogenous L1 retrotransposition has diversified genomic structures and transcripts significantly, distinguishing mouse lineages and driving a major portion of natural genetic variation.


Correspondence: 3 E-mail: symerd{at}mail.nih.gov


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] --
Genes Dev. Learn. Mem.
Protein Science RNA Genome Res.
Copyright © 2008 by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.