Genome Research

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] --
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print February 6, 2008
Genome Research, DOI: 10.1101/gr.068692.107
ACCEPTED PREPRINT
This Article
ACCEPTED PREPRINT
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Research Data
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
gr.068692.107v1
gr.068692.107v2
18/4/555    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Campbell, C. D
Right arrow Articles by Hirschhorn, J. N
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Campbell, C. D
Right arrow Articles by Hirschhorn, J. N
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Research

A survey of allelic imbalance in F1 mice

Catarina D Campbell1, Andrew Kirby2, James Nemesh1, Mark J Daly3, and Joel N Hirschhorn4

1 Program in Genomics and Division of Endocrinology, Children's Hospital Boston; 2 Program in Medical and Population Genetics, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard; 3 Mass General Hospital/Harvard Medical School

There are widespread, genetically determined differences in gene expression. However, methods that compare transcript levels between individuals are subject to trans-acting effects and environmental differences. By looking at allele-specific expression in the F1 progeny of inbred mice, we can directly test for allelic imbalance (AI), which must be due to cis-acting variants in the parental strains. We tested over one hundred genes for AI between C57Bl/6J and A/J alleles in F1 mice, including a validation set of 23 genes enriched for cis-acting variants and a second set of 92 genes whose orthologs were previously examined for AI in humans. We assayed an average of two transcribed SNPs per gene in liver, spleen, and brain from three male and three female F1 mice. In the set of 92 genes, we observed 33 genes (36%) with significant AI including genes with AI that was specific to certain tissues or transcripts. We also observed extensive tissue-specific AI, with 11 out of 92 genes (12%) having differences in AI between tissues. Interestingly, several genes with alternate transcripts have transcript-specific AI. Lastly, we observed that the presence of AI in human genes was correlated to the presence of AI in the mouse orthologs (one-tailed p=0.003), suggesting that certain genes may be more tolerant of cis-acting variation across species.


4 Corresponding author.

E-mail joelh{at}broad.mit.edu


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] --
Genes Dev. Learn. Mem.
Protein Science RNA Genome Res.
Copyright © 2008 by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.