This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Supplemental Research Data All Versions of this Article: gr.3266405v1 15/3/343    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Ciccarelli, F. D. Articles by Bork, P. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Ciccarelli, F. D. Articles by Bork, P. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Complex genomic rearrangements lead to novel primate gene function

¹ European Molecular Biology Laboratory, 69012 Heidelberg, Germany ² Max-Delbrueck-Centrum, D-13092 Berlin, Germany

Orthologous genes that maintain a single-copy status in a broad range of species may indicate a selection against gene duplication. If this is the case, then duplicates of such genes that do survive may have escaped the dosage control by rapid and sizable changes in their function. To test this hypothesis and to develop a strategy for the identification of novel gene functions, we have analyzed 22 primate-specific intrachromosomal duplications of genes with a single-copy ortholog in all other completely sequenced metazoans. When comparing this set to genes not exposed to the single-copy status constraint, we observed a higher tendency of the former to modify their gene structure, often through complex genomic rearrangements. The analysis of the most dramatic of these duplications, affecting 10% of human Chromosome 2, enabled a detailed reconstruction of the events leading to the appearance of a novel gene family. The eight members of this family originated from the highly conserved nucleoporin RanBP2 by several genetic rearrangements such as segmental duplications, inversions, translocations, exon loss, and domain accretion. We have experimentally verified that at least one of the newly formed proteins has a cellular localization different from RanBP2's, and we show that positive selection did act on specific domains during evolution.

[Supplemental material is available online at www.genome.org. and at http://www.bork.embl.de/~ciccarel/RGP_add_data.html.]

Article and publication are at http://www.genome.org/cgi/doi/10.1101/gr.3266405. Article published online ahead of print in February 2005.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				L. Dumas, Y. H. Kim, A. Karimpour-Fard, M. Cox, J. Hopkins, J. R. Pollack, and J. M. Sikela Gene copy number variation spanning 60 million years of human and primate evolution Genome Res., September 1, 2007; 17(9): 1266 - 1277. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. E. Johnson, NISC Comparative Sequencing Program, Z. Cheng, V. A. Morrison, S. Scherer, M. Ventura, R. A. Gibbs, E. D. Green, and E. E. Eichler Eukaryotic Transposable Elements and Genome Evolution Special Feature: Recurrent duplication-driven transposition of DNA during hominoid evolution PNAS, November 21, 2006; 103(47): 17626 - 17631. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Yu, H. Jiang, Q. Zhou, J. Yang, Y. Cun, B. Su, C. Xiao, and W. Wang Origination and evolution of a human-specific transmembrane protein gene, c1orf37-dup Hum. Mol. Genet., June 1, 2006; 15(11): 1870 - 1875. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Campillos, C. von Mering, L. J. Jensen, and P. Bork Identification and analysis of evolutionarily cohesive functional modules in protein networks Genome Res., March 1, 2006; 16(3): 374 - 382. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Sardiello, I. Annunziata, G. Roma, and A. Ballabio Sulfatases and sulfatase modifying factors: an exclusive and promiscuous relationship Hum. Mol. Genet., November 1, 2005; 14(21): 3203 - 3217. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]