|
|
|
|
Vol. 9, Issue 8, 732-738, August 1999
LETTER
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The type-A receptors for the neurotransmitter GABA
(
-aminobutyric acid) are ligand-gated chloride channels that
mediate postsynaptic inhibition. The functional diversity of these
receptors comes from the use of a large repertoire of subunits encoded
by separate genes, as well as from differences in subunit composition
of individual receptors. In mammals, a majority of GABAA
receptor subunit genes are located in gene clusters that may be
important for their regulated expression and function. We have
established a high-resolution physical map of the cluster of genes
encoding GABAA receptor subunits
2 (Gabra2),
1 (Gabrb1), and
1 (Gabrg1) on
mouse chromosome 5. Rat cDNA probes and specific sequence probes for
all three GABAA receptor subunit genes have been used to
initiate the construction of a sequence-ready contig of bacterial
artificial chromosomes (BACs) encompassing this cluster. In the process
of contig construction clones from 129/Sv and C57BL/6J BAC libraries
were isolated. The assembled 1.3-Mb contig, consisting of 45 BACs,
gives five- to sixfold coverage over the gene cluster and provides an
average resolution of one marker every 32 kb. A number of BAC insert
ends were sequenced, generating 30 new sequence tag sites (STS) in addition to 6 Gabr gene-based and 3 expressed sequence tag
(EST)-based markers. STSs from, and surrounding, the
Gabrg1-Gabra2-Gabrb1 gene cluster were mapped in the T31
mouse radiation hybrid panel. The integration of the BAC contig with a
map of loci ordered by radiation hybrid mapping suggested the most
likely genomic orientation of this cluster on mouse chromosome 5:
cen-D5Mit151-Gabrg1-Gabra2-Gabrb1-D5Mit58-tel. This
established contig will serve as a template for genomic sequencing and
for functional analysis of the GABAA gene cluster on mouse chromosome 5 and the corresponding region on human chromosome 4.
The sequence data described in this paper have been submitted to the GenBank/GSS data libraries under accession nos. AF156490 and AQ589406-AQ589436.
| |
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-Aminobutyric acid (GABA) is a potent
inhibitory neurotransmitter in the central nervous system (CNS) that
interacts with two different classes of GABA receptors: the ionotrophic
GABAA receptor chloride channels (for review, see Rabow et
al. 1995
; Seeburg et al. 1990
) and the recently cloned metabotropic
G-protein-coupled GABAB receptors (Kaupmann et al. 1997
, 1998
).
GABAA receptors are multimeric membrane-spanning ligand-gated
ion channels that admit chloride on binding of the neurotransmitter GABA (Bormann et al. 1987
). Because GABA is the major inhibitory neurotransmitter of the CNS, modulation of receptor activity has profound implications for both brain function and therapy of various neuropsychiatric disorders. Drugs that alter the GABAA
receptor channel activity, such as benzodiazepines, barbiturates, and
steroids, have had important roles in the understanding and treatment
of anxiety, sleep disorders, convulsive disorders, and epilepsy (for review, see Burt and Kamatchi 1991
; Brooks-Kayal et al. 1998
; Shiah and
Yatham 1998
).
Functional studies of the individual GABAA receptor genes
have been hindered by a high structural diversity among the
GABAA receptor subunits that assemble combinatorially to
build different subtypes of GABAA receptors in various
regions of the brain and the spinal cord. To date nineteen distinct
subunit types (
1-
6,
1-
4,
1-
4,
1,
,
1-
3) have been identified and this isoform complexity
is further complicated by the occurrence of alternative splicing and
post-translational modifications (Wisden and Seeburg 1992
). In the
mammalian genome, many GABAA receptor subunit genes are
organized as gene clusters on different chromosomes, with each of these
clusters containing at least one gene of the
,
, and
or
class. In humans, five GABAA receptor subunit gene clusters have been described. The
GABRB2-GABRA1/GABRA6-GABRG2 cluster on human chromosome
(HSA) 5q31.2-q35 (Kostrzewa et al. 1998
) is homologous to the cluster
on mouse chromosome (MMU) 11 (Garrett et al. 1997
). Similarly, the
GABRB3-GABRA5-GABRG3 gene cluster, located close to the
Prader-Willi/Angelman region on HSA 15q11-q13 (Glatt et al. 1997
;
Christian et al. 1998
), corresponds to the
Gabrb3-Gabra5-Gabrg3 cluster located distal to the pink-eyed dilution (p) gene region on MMU 7 (Nakatsu et al. 1993
; Culiat et al. 1994
). An additional cluster, containing the GABRA3,
GABRB4, and GABRE2 subunit genes, has been mapped to
human chromosome Xq28 (Levin et al. 1996
; Wilke et al. 1997
) and mouse
chromosome X (Boyd et al. 1998
). Two GABAA subunit genes,
1 and
2, expressed at a high level in the retina, have been
shown to map to HSA 6q11-q14 and the corresponding region in the
proximal portion of MMU 4 (Cutting et al. 1992
).
In humans, the GABRA2, GABRG1, and GABRB1
genes have been mapped to HSA 4p12-p13 (Buckle et al. 1989
; Kirkness
et al. 1991
; Wilcox et al. 1992
). Furthermore, somatic cell hybrid
analysis has indicated that the GABRA4 gene maps to the same
cluster (McLean et al. 1995
). The murine orthologs, Gabra2 and
Gabrb1 subunit genes, have been localized to the central
portion of MMU 5, whereas the Gabra4 subunit gene has been
assigned to proximal MMU 7 (Danciger et al. 1993
). We have previously
placed the murine Gabrb1 locus on a long-range restriction
map, 3 Mb proximal to the dominant spotting locus (W) encoded
by the proto-oncogene c-Kit (Nagle et al. 1995
). To gain
insight into the genomic organization of the GABAA receptor
gene cluster on mouse chromosome 5, we have constructed a
sequence-ready bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) contig of 1.3 Mb.
This contig has been anchored to other chromosome 5 loci using
radiation hybrid (RH) mapping, and the transcriptional orientation of
two GABAA receptor subunit genes, Gabra2 and
Gabrb1, has been determined. This high-resolution physical map
will provide the basis for functional characterization and sequencing
of genes located in this cluster.
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The contig spanning the GABAA receptor genes in the central portion of mouse chromosome 5 was generated in the following steps: (1) initial hybridization screen; (2) STS content mapping; (3) chromosome walk using selected STSs generated from BAC ends; and (4) fine mapping by fingerprinting and Southern blot analysis. To initiate the construction of a BAC contig, we used Gabra2 and Gabrg1 rat cDNA probes and a mouse Gabrb1 cDNA clone to screen two 129/Sv BAC libraries. We isolated 27 BAC clones, and 23 were confirmed to correspond to GABAA receptor genes by dot-blot colony assays and by Southern blot analysis. The BAC-insert sizes were determined by pulsed field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) following a NotI digestion of BAC DNA.
To facilitate further analysis, we selected gene-specific primers for
the three GABAA genes (Table 1). Whereas
nucleotide sequence of full-length cDNAs was available for the mouse
Gabra2 and Gabrb1 subunit genes (Table 1; Wang et al.
1992
; Kamatchi et al. 1995
), we obtained partial sequence for the mouse
Gabrg1 gene by screening an olfactory bulb cDNA library
with a rat Gabrg1 probe (Table 1). For each gene,
5' and 3' PCR assays were developed and used for BAC contig
construction. Among 23 positive BAC clones, 13 BACs were selected for
nucleotide sequence analysis of the insert ends (Fig.
1). The nonrepetitive insert end sequences provided 19 new STSs (Table 1). STS mapping using all available markers revealed
that we had isolated three independent groups of BACs corresponding to
the Gabra2, Gabrb1, and Gabrg1 subunit gene
regions with no overlaps between the three groups of clones.
|
|
To comply with the mouse genome initiative that has designated the
C57BL/6J genome as a reference strain for genomic sequencing, further
BAC isolation in the GABAA cluster on mouse chromosome 5 was
performed by screening a C57BL/6J BAC library. To efficiently convert a
129/Sv clone collection into a C57BL/6J BAC contig, we selected 10 STSs
for library screening. Sixteen new C57BL/6J BACs were sized and tested
for STS and probe content and precisely positioned to the regions
already covered by the 129/Sv BACs. In addition, STSs corresponding to
the BAC ends were used to isolate clones that joined the
Gabra2 and Gabrg1 groups of BACs, showing that these
two genes map within an interval of 370 kb. Furthermore, BAC clones
isolated with the D5Mit305 marker filled the gap between the
Gabra2 and Gabrb1 BACs. The D5Mit305 marker
was the only simple sequence length polymorphism (SSLP) marker among 15 markers assigned to the 41 cM interval on the composite genetic map
(Kozak and Stephenson 1998
) that mapped to the 1.3 Mb region covered by
the BAC contig.
The established BAC contig contains 45 BAC clones, covers a physical distance of about 1.3 Mb, and provides ordering information for 40 new markers. Among these are 29 STSs designed from BAC-insert ends, 5'- and 3'-specific sequence markers developed from GABAA receptor subunit cDNAs, and three new ESTs that were found by sequence homology of BAC ends to mouse EST cDNA clones (Table 1). Overall, this results in an average spacing of 1 marker per 32 kb within the contig and a five- to sixfold coverage with independent BAC clones. Because of the uneven distribution of STSs within the contig, the number of "hits" per BAC clone varies from 3 to 15. Fourteen C57BL/6J-derived BAC clones were selected for fingerprinting of EcoRI-digested DNA (data not shown). The pattern of EcoRI restriction fragments further confirmed the order of clones established by STS content mapping. This analysis identified six BAC clones that represent a minimal tiling path (Fig. 1). The STS content mapping using 5' and 3' gene-specific primer pairs and Southern blot analysis determined the transcriptional orientation of the Gabra2 and Gabrb1 genes with respect to contig ends and thus, with respect to each other. The two genes are transcribed in opposite directions (Fig. 1).
Finally, a genomic PCR assay specific for the Gabra4 subunit gene was developed from a partial mouse cDNA sequence (Table 1). Primers were chosen from the portion of the gene encoding the amino-terminal extracellular domain (amino acids 72-166) yielding a 280-bp amplicon in brain cDNA and a genomic PCR product of 1.2 kb. A PCR assay using these primers was performed to test for the presence of the Gabra4 gene on the contig (data not shown). We found no evidence that the Gabra4 gene is located within this GABAA cluster. We have not discounted the possibility that Gabra4 could be located close to, but not within, the 1.3-Mb region covered by the contig.
Nucleotide sequence analysis was performed on 40 BAC ends. The overall percentage of repetitive sequence detected using RepeatMasker in these BAC end-sequences was 17.5%. Three BAC ends contained sequences with high homology to ESTs (Table 1), but no homology to any known gene in the GenBank database. Expression analysis using RT-PCR confirmed that these are indeed transcribed sequences, expressed in several tissues, such as liver, spleen, testis, kidney, lungs and brain (data not shown).
To integrate the Gabrg1-Gabra2-Gabrb1 BAC contig with the
existing map of the mouse chromosome 5, we mapped several STSs and chromosome 5 SSLP markers using the mouse whole-genome RH panel. The
commonly used T31 panel consists of 100 hybrid cell lines generated
with a 3000-rad dose and has been shown to have a retention frequency
of 27.6% (McCarthy et al. 1997
). In contrast to genetic mapping, which
requires markers with SSLP polymorphism between inbred strains used to
generate the cross, PCR-based RH mapping requires markers that are
present in mouse and absent in hamster DNA, or alternatively, that the
amplicons detected in these DNAs are of different size. This makes RH
mapping useful as an aid to anchor clone contigs on the chromosome
relative to markers previously mapped or ordered along the chromosome.
It also enables quick verification of chromosomal position of BAC
clones containing members of large gene families.
To determine the orientation of our BAC contig, we mapped the following STSs: 253K12.T7(D5Buc18), 473P3.SP6(D5Buc12), and an EST developed from the 3'-UTR of the Gabrb1 gene in the T31 RH panel. We also included the SSLP marker D5Mit305 placed on the contig between Gabra2 and Gabrb1 (Fig. 1). PCR analysis of each marker was performed twice and consensus vector scores (Fig. 2) were entered in a data file containing scores for >50 loci along mouse chromosome 5 (L. Tarantino, C. Otmani, T. Wiltshire, A. Lengeling, and M. Bucan, unpubl.). Pairwise analysis of the data gave a single linkage group for the three GABAA receptor loci and several SSLP markers (D5Mit151, D5Mit305, and D5Mit58) localized in the central portion of mouse chromosome 5 (Fig. 2). This analysis confirmed the location of the BAC contig on mouse chromosome 5. Furthermore, using Map Manager QT, we calculated the relative marker order along the chromosome by minimizing the number of occurred breaks and determined the most likely order: cen-D5Mit151-D5Buc12 (Gabrg1)-D5Buc18 (Gabra2)-Gabrb1-D5Mit58-tel (Fig. 2).
|
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In this report we present a sequence-ready BAC contig spanning the
cluster of genes encoding GABAA receptor subunits
Gabra2, Gabrb1, and Gabrg1 located in the
central portion of mouse chromosome 5. The established contig covers
~1.3 Mb, as determined by the sizes of BACs corresponding to a
minimal tiling path. The gene order of the three subunit genes on mouse
chromosome 5 is the same as in all clusters that are composed of three
subunits genes (
-
-
/
) and as observed in the human
chromosome 15 cluster,
and
subunits are transcribed in opposite
directions (Greger et al. 1995
). In addition to the genes encoding
GABAA subunits, this physical map includes three ESTs
encoding genes of unknown function, with a widespread tissue expression
pattern, and with no corresponding or mapped human ESTs. Although
chromosomal localization for several GABAA receptor clusters
has been determined in the mouse and human genome, a high-resolution
physical map is only available for the GABAA clusters on
human chromosomes 15 and 5 (Christian et al. 1998
; Kostrzewa et al.
1998
). Comparative sequence analysis of coding and noncoding regions of
GABAA receptor genes, both within a cluster and between
different clusters, in the mouse and humans may provide important
information concerning the complex regulation of gene expression of
members of this large gene family. For example, comprehensive
expression analysis indicates overlapping expression of
Gabra2, Gabrb1, and Gabrg1 in several
regions of the brain, such as the neocortex, hippocampus, basal nuclei,
amygdala, and red nucleus of the midbrain (for a summary, see Rabow et
al. 1995
). Comparative physical mapping and sequencing will shed light on the mechanisms involved in the tandem gene duplication events and
transpositions that led to the clustered organization of the GABAA receptor genes. Further studies concerning the presence of an additional
subunit (
4) on human chromosome 4 (McLean et al. 1995
), and apparent absence of the mouse ortholog in the immediate vicinity of the
2 subunit gene in the
corresponding cluster on mouse chromosome 5, may indicate a dynamic
evolution of this gene family. Furthermore, the presence or absence of
nonrelated genes dispersed among the gene-family members in other
clusters will provide useful insight into the timing of rearrangements during the evolution and origin of these genes in different species.
In the mouse, the Gabrg1-Gabra2-Gabrb1 cluster is located
proximal to the cluster of classical developmental mutations
dominant spotting (W) and patch (Ph), which are
caused by mutations or chromosomal rearrangements in the tyrosine
kinase receptor genes Kit and Pdgfra (Reith and
Bernstein 1991
). In the human genome, orthologous genes are located in
the centromeric portion of chromosome 4, with the GABRA2,
GABRB1, and GABRG1 loci mapped to the short arm
(4p12-p13), and the KIT-PDGFRA cluster on the long arm
(4q12-q13) (http://www3.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Omim/Homology/). Sequence
analysis of the region between the two clusters in the mouse should aid in determining sequences surrounding the centromere of human chromosome 4.
The construction of this contig coincides with the launching of an
initiative to generate a working draft of the mouse genome sequence by
2003 (Battey et al. 1999
). This effort will employ a random strategy
for selection of clones that will not involve extensive mapping efforts
and construction of sequence-ready BAC contigs prior to sequencing. In
the initial phase, however, established contigs such as this, spanning
the GABAA cluster, will provide a useful template for the
generation of long stretches of contiguous genomic sequence in the
mouse. A common C57BL/6J BAC library has been designated as the
reference library in this sequencing effort (http://bacpac.med.buffalo.edu/mouse_bac.html). Our data add to the
initial evaluation of the high quality of this library, its uniform
coverage, and a large average insert size (197 kb). Although the
comparative sequence analysis of the GABAA clusters will
provide important information concerning functional domains in the
coding and noncoding regions, BAC clones containing individual
GABAA subunit genes will provide immediate resources for
functional studies.
| |
METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Isolation and Processing of BAC Clones
BAC clones were isolated by hybridization of probes to
high-density library filters from three different BAC libraries: 129/Sv (Research Genetics, Huntsville, AL), RPCI-22 129/SvEvTACfBr, and RPCI-23 C57BL/6J BAC libraries (K. Osoegawa, M. Tateno, and P. de
Jong, in prep.; for more information, see
http://bacpac.med.buffalo.edu/mouse_bac.html). BAC libraries were
initially screened with probes from rat Gabra2 cDNA
(Khrestchatisky et al. 1991
), rat Gabrg1 cDNA (M. Khrestchatisky and A. Tobin, unpubl.), and the mouse Gabrb1
cDNA (Nagle et al. 1995
), and subsequent screenings used STSs generated
from BAC-end sequences. All radioactive labeling of probes used
standard random-primed methods (Feinberg and Vogelstein 1983
).
All BACs isolated were arrayed as colony dot blots in a 96-well format. BACs were grown overnight in 100 µl of Luria broth (LB)/chloramphenicol, spotted onto nylon filters, and then grown for 8 hr on LB agar plates. Filters were processed using alkaline lysis and Proteinase K/Sarkosyl treatment (see http://www.resgen.com/depts/rnd/rapid.html).
BAC DNA was prepared by standard alkaline lysis methods (Sambrook et
al. 1989
) from 5 ml of overnight culture and resuspended in 40 µl
of TE buffer. Miniprep DNA (5 µl) was digested immediately in a
total volume of 20 µl with 5 units of NotI enzyme (New
England Biolabs, Inc., Beverly, MA) for 2 hr at 37°C. Samples were
loaded on a 1% agarose gel in 0.5% Tris-borate-EDTA (TBE) and
subjected to PFGE (Bio-Rad CHEF DR II) for 16 hr at 6 V/cm, 15°C
with a switching interval from 5 sec to 15 sec. BAC insert sizes were assigned from ethidium bromide-stained gels using AlphEase software and
an Alpha-Imager 2000 gel-documentation system (Alpha Innotech, San
Leandro, CA). EcoRI digests of freshly prepared miniprep DNA were also used to fingerprint clones according to the methods of Marra
et al. (1997)
. Clone overlap analysis was carried out manually.
Sequencing of BAC-Insert Ends
BAC DNA for sequencing was prepared from 200 ml of overnight culture according to the modified protocol for BACs using P100 midi-prep columns (Qiagen, Inc., Valencia, CA). Automated dideoxy-terminator cycle sequencing was carried out with SP6 and T7 primers on BAC DNA (2 µg of DNA in a 20-µl reaction) using ABI Big Dye Terminator sequencing chemistry with Taq FS polymerase from Applied BioSystems (Foster City, CA). Reaction products were purified by G50 spin columns and analyzed on ABI 377 automated sequencers (DNA Sequencing Facility, Department of Genetics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia).
Development of New STSs and Marker Content Mapping
BAC end sequence was assessed for development of new STS markers. To determine rodent specific and low complexity repeats, nucleotide sequences were analyzed using RepeatMasker (http://ftp.genome.washington.edu/cgi-bin/RepeatMasker). Primer 3.0 software (http://www-genome.wi.mit.edu/cgi-bin/primer/primer3.cgi) was used for selection of PCR primers. STS content mapping of BACs was determined by hybridization of specific probes to colony dot blots. PCR was performed with diluted mini-prep BAC DNA in 15-µl reactions consisting of 1× buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl at pH 8.3, 50 mM KCl, and 2.5 mM MgCl2), 0.2 mM each dNTP, 1 µM each STS primer, and 0.5 unit of Taq polymerase (Roche, Indianapolis, IN) under the following conditions: 94°C for 30 sec, annealing for 30 sec (temperatures listed in Table 1), 72°C for 30 sec, for 35 cycles.
Screening of cDNA Libraries
The rat Gabrg1 cDNA probe (1200-bp EcoRV fragment) was used to screen an arrayed mouse olfactory bulb cDNA library (Resource Center/Primary Database of the German Human Genome Project, Max Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics, Berlin-Charlottenburg, Germany). Clone UCDMp608P0343Q2 was isolated, sequenced, and used to design 5'- and 3'-specific PCR assays for the mouse Gabrg1 gene.
RH Mapping
T31 RH panel DNAs (Research Genetics, Huntsville, AL) were diluted
to 3 ng/µl and 3 µl of each cell hybrid clone DNA was used in
PCRs. PCR reagents and conditions were previously described. Primers
were initially tested on mouse and hamster DNA controls, prior to the
analysis of 100-cell hybrid lines. PCR amplicons were run on 2%
agarose gels and the presence or absence of PCR fragments were scored.
For each marker the T31 RH panel was typed twice. Data analysis was
performed with Map Manager QTb 27 ppc. Distances between neighboring
loci (in centirays) were calculated with the RH2PT function of the RH
Map program (Lunetta et al. 1996
). The RH mapping data (vector scores)
have been deposited at the European Bioinformatics Institute
(http://www.ebi.ac.uk/RHdb/index.html).
| |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
We thank Michel Khrestchatisky and Allan Tobin for the rat Gabrga2 and Gabrg1 cDNA probes, Lisa Tarantino and Ali Alavizadeh for help with the RH mapping analysis, Ariel Soiffer for the technical assistance in the initial phase of this project, Nadja Pohl for assistance with the cDNA screen, Lisa Stubbs and Mark LaLande for discussions on gene order in GABAA clusters, and Tom Ferraro and Lisa Tarantino for comments on the manuscript. These studies were supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health (HD 28410 and MH 57855).
The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 USC section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
3 Corresponding author.
E-MAIL bucan{at}pobox.upenn.edu; FAX (215) 573-2041.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
3,
5, or
3 subunit of the type A gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor in mice.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
91:
2815-2818
6 subunit gene (Gabra6) is tightly linked to the
1-
2 subunit cluster on mouse chromosome 11.
Mol. Brain Res.
45:
133-137[Medline].
3 subunit gene (GABRG3) is tightly linked to the
5 subunit gene (GABRA5) on human chromosome 15q11-q13 and is transcribed in the same orientation.
Genomics
26:
258-264[CrossRef][Medline].
1,
2, and
3 subunits: Comparisons in DBA/2J and C57BL/6J mice.
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1261:
134-142[Medline].
2 polypeptide of rat gamma-aminobutyric acid A receptors.
J. Neurochem.
56:
1717-1722[CrossRef][Medline].
4 subunit gene (GABRA4) to human chromosome 4 defines an
2-
4-
1-
1 gene cluster: Further evidence that modern GABAA receptor gene clusters are derived from an ancestral cluster.
Genomics
26:
580-586[CrossRef][Medline].
1,
2, and
3 subunits of GABAA receptors: Comparison in seizure-prone and -resistant mice and during development.
J. Mol. Neurosci.
3:
177-184[Medline].
1 and
2 subunits of the gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor indicates that members of this gene family are often clustered in the genome.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
89:
5857-5861Received April 26, 1999; accepted in revised form June 10, 1999.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. Crabtree, T. Wiltshire, B. Brunk, S. Zhao, J. Schug, C. J. Stoeckert Jr., and M. Bucan High-Resolution BAC-Based Map of the Central Portion of Mouse Chromosome 5 Genome Res., October 1, 2001; 11(10): 1746 - 1757. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. A. Bachmanov, X. Li, D. R. Reed, J. D. Ohmen, S. Li, Z. Chen, M. G. Tordoff, P. J. de Jong, C. Wu, D. B. West, et al. Positional Cloning of the Mouse Saccharin Preference (Sac) Locus Chem Senses, September 1, 2001; 26(7): 925 - 933. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. C. Schimenti, B. J. Libby, R. A. Bergstrom, L. A. Wilson, D. Naf, L. M. Tarantino, A. Alavizadeh, A. Lengeling, and M. Bucan Interdigitated Deletion Complexes on Mouse Chromosome 5 Induced by Irradiation of Embryonic Stem Cells Genome Res., July 1, 2000; 10(7): 1043 - 1050. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||