The availability of complete genome sequences has allowed the
prediction of all exported proteins of the corresponding organisms with
dedicated algorithms. Even though numerous studies report on
genome-based predictions of signal peptides and cell retention signals,
they lack a proteomic verification. For example, 180 secretory and 114 lipoprotein signal peptides were predicted recently for the
Gram-positive eubacterium Bacillus subtilis. In the present studies, proteomic approaches were used to define the extracellular complement of the B. subtilis secretome. Using different
growth conditions and a hyper-secreting mutant, ~200 extracellular
proteins were visualized by two-dimensional (2D) gel electrophoresis,
of which 82 were identified by mass spectrometry. These include 41 proteins that have a potential signal peptide with a type I signal peptidase (SPase) cleavage site, and lack a retention signal. Strikingly, the remaining 41 proteins were predicted previously to be
cell associated because of the apparent absence of a signal peptide
(22), or the presence of specific cell retention signals in addition to
an export signal (19). To test the importance of the five type I SPases
and the unique lipoprotein-specific SPase of B. subtilis, the
extracellular proteome of (multiple) SPase mutants was analyzed.
Surprisingly, only the processing of the polytopic membrane protein
YfnI was strongly inhibited in Spase I mutants, showing for the first
time that a native eubacterial membrane protein is a genuine Spase I
substrate. Furthermore, a mutation affecting lipoprotein modification
and processing resulted in the shedding of at least 23 (lipo-)proteins
into the medium. In conclusion, our observations show that genome-based
predictions reflect the actual composition of the extracellular
proteome for ~50%. Major problems are currently encountered with the
prediction of extracellular proteins lacking signal peptides (including
cytoplasmic proteins) and lipoproteins.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
As soil microorganisms, Bacillus species secrete numerous
enzymes, enabling them to degrade a variety of
substrates and survive in a complex and continuously changing
environment. The best-studied representative of this genus is
Bacillus subtilis. The genome sequence of this organism was
published in 1997, representing the first complete genome sequence of a
Gram-positive eubacterium (Kunst et al. 1997
). Since then, much
Bacillus-related research has been focused on the functional
analysis of the identified genes and their expression (see the Micado
and JAFAN databases, http://Locus.jouy.inra.fr/cgi-bin/genmic/madbase_home.pl and
http://bacillus.genome.ad.jp/BSORF-DB.html, respectively ). In
contrast, the subcellular localization of the corresponding proteins
has received relatively little attention thus far. Very recently, we
made a first series of predictions concerning the composition of the
so-called secretome of B. subtilis, which, by definition,
includes both the secreted proteins and the protein secretion
machineries (Tjalsma et al. 2000
). In summary, four distinct pathways
for protein export from the cytoplasm and ~300 proteins with the
potential to be exported were distinguished. By far, the largest number
of exported proteins was predicted to follow the major Sec pathway for
protein secretion. In contrast, the recently identified
twin-arginine translocation Tat
pathway (Jongbloed et al. 2000
), a pseudopilin export pathway for
competence development, and certain ATP-binding
cassette (ABC) transporters can be regarded as
special-purpose pathways, through which only few proteins appear to be
transported (Tjalsma et al. 2000
).
Compared with eukaryotes such as yeast (Drawid and Gerstein 2000
;
Drawid et al. 2000
), vegetative cells of B. subtilis have a
limited number of subcellular compartments, the cytoplasm being confined by the cytoplasmic membrane, which, in turn, is surrounded by
the cell wall. Notably, the cell wall is a thick (10-50 nm) extracytoplasmic compartment composed of peptidoglycan and anionic polymers, such as teichoic and teichuronic acids (Archibald et al.
1993
). Even though the cell wall of B. subtilis may be
functionally equivalent to the Gram-negative periplasm (Pooley and
Karamata 1996
), proteins that are active in this compartment have to be retained with specific cell-wall-binding domains. In fact, ~56% of
the proteins containing a potential amino-terminal signal peptide for
export from the cytoplasm are predicted to be secreted into the growth
medium, because these proteins lack specific membrane or
cell-wall-retention signals (Tjalsma et al. 2000
).
During or shortly after the translocation of (pre-)proteins across the
membrane, their amino-terminal signal peptide is removed by SPases
(signal peptidases). In B. subtilis, two major classes of signal peptides can be distinguished
on the basis of the SPase recognition sequence (Tjalsma et al. 2000
).
The first class is composed of 180 typical signal peptides, which are
present in secretory pre-proteins that are cleaved by one of the five
type-I SPases (SipS-W) of B. subtilis (Tjalsma et al. 1997
,
1998
). The second major class of signal peptides is present in 114 (putative) pre-lipoproteins, which are cleaved by the
lipoprotein-specific (type II) SPase of B. subtilis (Lsp;
Tjalsma et al. 1999
). The most important difference between signal
peptides of lipoproteins and secretory proteins is the presence of a
conserved lipobox in lipoprotein precursors. This lipobox contains an
invariable cysteine residue that is lipid modified by the lipoprotein
diacylglyceryl transferase (Lgt), prior to precursor cleavage by SPase
II (Leskelä et al. 1999
; Tjalsma et al. 1999
). The exported
lipid-modified proteins remain anchored to the membrane by their
amino-terminal lipid-modified cysteine residue, which serves as a
membrane retention signal. Notably, 13 proteins appear to contain a
potential cell-wall-retention signal in addition to an amino-terminal
signal peptide (for review, see Tjalsma et al. 2000
).
The fact that exported B. subtilis proteins are not retained
by an outer membrane, as encounterd in Gram-negative eubacteria, makes
this Gram-positive eubacterium a preferred organism for the proteomic
verification of genome-based signal peptide predictions. In the present
studies, we have accomplished this by two-dimensional (2D) gel
electrophoresis and subsequent mass spectrometry of extracellular proteins. The results show that our previous predictions of signal peptides with an SPase I cleavage site are largely correct. However, a
significant number of membrane proteins, predicted lipoproteins, and
even proteins without a signal peptide was also identified in the
growth medium. These observations imply that, in addition to the known
mechanisms for protein export, B. subtilis can avail itself of
alternative mechanisms to release and/or maintain such proteins into
the external environment.
 |
RESULTS |
The Extracellular Proteome of B. subtilis 168
The highest levels of protein secretion are usually observed when
cells of B. subtilis are grown in rich medium, in particular during the stationary growth phase. Therefore, to create a first inventory of the extracellular proteome, we have used B. subtilis cells grown in L-broth. Samples were taken during
exponential growth and after entry into the stationary phase. Next,
extracellular proteins secreted into the growth medium were
precipitated and subjected to 2D gel electrophoresis. As shown in
Figure 1, most of the
extracellular proteins, which are only weakly detectable during
exponential growth, are induced upon entry into the stationary phase.
Of the ~200 visible extracellular proteins, 75 different proteins
could be identified by matrix assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry as marked in
the 2D master gel for the extracellular proteome (Fig. 1B). Seven
additional extracellular proteins were identified in the medium of
phosphate starvation-induced cells (Antelmann et al. 2000
).


View larger version (237K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 1
The extracellular proteome of B. subtilis 168. Cells of
B. subtilis 168 were grown in L-broth and proteins in the
growth medium were harvested during exponential growth
(OD540 = 0.4) (A) and 1 h after entry into the
stationary phase (B; master gel for the extracellular
proteome). After precipitation with TCA, the extracellular proteins
were separated by 2D PAGE as described in the Methods section. The
proteins identified by mass spectrometry are indicated on the gel and
listed in Table 1. These gels are available in the Sub2D proteome
database (http://microbio2.biologie.uni-greifswald.de:8880/). (See
following page for panel B.)
|
|
The 82 identified extracellular proteins include 50 proteins to which a
function had been assigned previously, and 32 Y proteins of apparently
unknown function (Table
1A,B).
Nevertheless, a possible function could be attributed to 19 Y proteins
on the basis of their amino acid sequence similarity to proteins with a
known function. Taken together, it seems that the identified
extracellular proteins of B. subtilis 168 include 18 enzymes
related to the metabolism of carbohydrates, nine proteases or
peptidases, two enzymes involved in the metabolism of amino acids,
three enzymes involved in the decay of DNA or RNA, one lipase, two
alkaline phosphatases, two phosphodiesterases, seven proteins involved in cell-wall biogenesis, eight lipoproteins, of which seven are substrate-binding components of various transport systems (Table 1A,
proteins marked lipo), five proteins involved in
detoxification, three flagella-related proteins, one putative
transcriptional regulator, two proteins involved in protein synthesis
and folding (among which is the chaperonin GroEL), five
prophage-related proteins, one sporulation-specific protein, and 13 proteins of unknown function. Notably, the relative amounts of 60 identified extracellular proteins are significantly increased during
the stationary phase (Table 1C).
Most of the identified extracellular proteins migrate on the 2D gels at
a position that is in good agreement with their calculated molecular
weight and isoelectric point. It has to be noted that several protein
spots are present as pearl chains, which might represent isoelectric
focusing artefacts that are due to the trichloroacetic acid (TCA)
precipitation during sample preparation. Notably, the high-molecular
weight cell-wall-associated proteins WprA and WapA, as well as the
bacillopeptidase F (Bpr), the serine protease (Epr), and the major
autolysin LytD do not run at, or close to, the estimated position. Most
likely, this is due to proteolytic processing upon export from the
cytoplasm. In fact, the two major degradation products of WprA, known
as CWBP52 and CWBP23, were both detected (Fig. 1B). In addition,
several degradation products of WapA could be identified, of which the
58-kD product represented one of the most abundant extracellular
proteins. As revealed by amino-terminal sequencing, the latter protein
represents the carboxy-terminal end of WapA, starting with
Ser1725 (Foster 1993
).
Verification of Genome-based Signal Peptide Predictions
Of the 82 identifed extracellular proteins (Table 1), 48 were
previously predicted to contain an amino-terminal signal peptide and no
transmembrane segments (Tjalsma et al. 2000
): (numbers shown in italics
refer to the overview in Fig. 2) 39 with a type I SPase
cleavage site, and 9 with a type II SPase cleavage
site. Notably, 4 of the predicted
pre-proteins with a type I SPase cleavage site also contain typical
cell-wall-binding repeats (LytD, WapA, YvcE, and YwtD). In contrast,
2 proteins (YweA and YxkC) with a signal peptide and a type I
SPase cleavage site were not predicted previously; the signal peptide
of YweA was missed by the SignalP algorithm for unknown reasons, and
the signal peptide of YxkC because it is unusually long (Table 1A). As
shown by amino-terminal sequencing, one of the 9 proteins with
a predicted SPase II cleavage site and no potential transmembrane
segments, YrpD, was processed at a typical cleavage site for SPase I
(Table 1A), suggesting that this protein is not a lipoprotein.
Moreover, the potential SPase II site of YrpD (FGTC) was found only
once among the 114 predicted lipoproteins of B. subtilis.
Similarly, the XynD protein has a potential SPase I cleavage site in
addition to a uniquely observed SPase II cleavage site (LLSC) and a
transmembrane segment (Tjalsma et al. 2000
). In the following report,
YrpD and XynD are, therefore, no longer referred to as lipoproteins.

View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 2
Overview of identified and predicted extracellular proteins of B. subtilis 168. Extracellular proteins, as listed in Table 1, were
classified as predicted or unpredicted with respect to their
extracellular localization on the basis of previous genome-based
predictions of signal peptides and retention signals (Tjalsma et al.
2000 ). Proteins with signal peptides are further classified on the
basis of their cleavage sites for SPase I or II, and the presence of
cell-wall-binding domains. Note that potential pre-proteins with an
SPase I cleavage site and predicted transmembrane segments were
excluded from previous predictions. XynD, which has a predicted SPase
II cleavage site in addition to a potential transmembrane segment, is
counted as a transmembrane protein; both predictions are, however,
probably wrong (see Results section and Table 1A). The indicated
numbers correspond to numbers printed in italics in the Results
section.
|
|
The extracellular proteins that were not included previously in our
listings of proteins with a cleavable signal peptide (Tjalsma et al.
2000
) form a heterogeneous group as follows: 6 have potential transmembrane segments according to the TopPred algorithm of Sipos and
von Heijne (1993)
(Ggt, XynD, YfkN, YhcR, PbpA, and YfnI), and 22 other
proteins lack an amino-terminal signal peptide of known type (Table 1).
Upon reinvestigation with the TMHMM algorithm for the prediction of
transmembrane segments (for review, see Nilsson et al. 2000
), the
presence of transmembrane segments in 2 of the 6 extracellular
proteins (Ggt and XynD; Table 1A) was not confirmed. Finally, the group
of extracellular proteins without a typical signal peptide includes
3 flagella-related proteins (Hag, FlgK, and FliD), 5 prophage-related proteins (XepA, XkdG, XkdK, XkdM, and XlyA), and
14 hydrophilic proteins (Table 1B; Fig. 2). The latter
proteins were identified as abundant cytoplasmic proteins (H. Antelmann
and M. Hecker, unpubl.).
The Extracellular Proteome of the Hyper-secreting
degU32(hy) Mutant
The induction of extracellular degradative enzymes of B. subtilis at the end of the exponential growth phase is dependent on
the DegSU two-component system (Lepesant et al. 1972
; Ayusaw et al.
1975
). Certain mutations in the degS or degU genes,
causing more stable phosphorylation of DegU, result in the
hyperproduction of degradative enzymes (Hy-phenotype; Henner et al.
1988
; Kunst et al. 1988
). Despite the fact that numerous studies on the
DegSU system have been documented, a comprehensive description of all DegSU-regulated extracellular proteins is still lacking. For this reason, we analyzed the extracellular proteome of the hyper-secreting degU32(hy) strain, which exhibited dramatic changes compared
with the parental strain. All identified extracellular proteins that are up- or down-regulated in this hyperphosphorylated
degU32(hy) mutant are listed in Table
2. As expected, the alkaline protease AprE
represented the most abundant protease secreted into the medium. In
addition, six other proteases/peptidases, including the
bacillopeptidase Bpr, the serine protease Vpr, the metalloproteases Mpr
and NprE, the
-glutamyltranspeptidase Ggt, and the aminopeptidase YwaD were overproduced in the degU32(hy) mutant strain. Of the secreted enzymes involved in the metabolism of carbohydrates, the
-amylase AmyE,
-glucanase BglS, xylanase YnfF, and pectate lyase
PelB were found to be present at significantly elevated levels.
Finally, increased amounts of two enzymes involved in the degradation
of nucleotides, the ribonuclease YurI and 2`,3'-cyclic-nucleotide 2`-phosphodiesterase YfkN, were detected in the medium of the degU32(hy) strain, indicating that the corresponding genes are new members of the DegSU-regulon.
Notably, the degU32(hy) mutation is known to display
pleiotropic effects. Thus, unlike the parental strain 168, the
degU32(hy) mutant does not only show an increased secretion of
degradative enzymes, but it can also sporulate in the presence of
glucose, displays a filamentous morphology, lacks flagella, and is
unable to develop competence for DNA binding and uptake (Kunst et al. 1974
). Consistent with some of these phenotypes, the autolysins LytD
and YwtD, flagellin Hag, flagellar hook-associated proteins FlgK and
FliD, and the wall-associated protein WapA (the genes of which are all
regulated by the alternative
factor
D for motility and
chemotaxis; Helmann et al. 1988
) were absent from the medium of the
degU32(hy) mutant (Fig. 3).
Furthermore, the relative amounts of two extracellular proteins of
unknown function, YlqB and YxkC, were strongly reduced.

View larger version (122K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 3
The extracellular proteome of B. subtilis degU32(hy). Cells of
B. subtilis degU32(hy) were grown in L-broth and proteins in
the growth medium were harvested 1 h after entry into the stationary
phase. After precipitation with TCA, the extracellular proteins were
separated by 2D PAGE as described in the Methods section. The proteins
identified by mass spectrometry are indicated. Extracellular proteins
of which the synthesis is induced in the degU32(hy) mutant are
boxed, and those of which the synthesis is reduced are printed in bold
(see also the listing in Table 2). This gel is available in the Sub2D
proteome database
(http://microbio2.biologie.uni-greifswald.de:8880/).
|
|
The Membrane Protein YfnI is Processed by the Signal Peptidases SipT
and SipV
Previous studies on the five type I SPases of B. subtilis
have shown that these enzymes have different, but overlapping substrate specificities, as exemplified with the
-amylase AmyQ (Tjalsma et al.
1997
, 1998
). To further investigate possible differences in the
substrate specificities of the type I SPases of B. subtilis, we analyzed the extracellular proteomes of single SPase mutants lacking
sipS, sipT, sipU, sipV, or
sipW. Surprisingly, no major differences in the extracellular
protein patterns of these mutant strains were observed (data not
shown). Therefore, we also analyzed the extracellular proteomes of
double, triple, and quadruple sip mutant strains as listed in
Table 1. Strikingly, all 2D gels with extracellular proteins of
multiple sip mutant strains displayed nearly identical protein
patterns with only one exception, the mutant strains lacking both
sipT and sipV showed strongly reduced extracellular
levels of the membrane protein YfnI (Fig.
4). This result implies that SipT and SipV
are responsible for the specific cleavage of YfnI.

View larger version (69K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 4
Processing of the membrane protein YfnI by the type I signal peptidases
SipT and SipV. Single and multiple signal peptidase (sip)
mutants of B. subtilis were grown in L-broth, and proteins in
the growth medium were harvested 1 h after entry into the stationary
phase. After precipitation with TCA, the extracellular proteins were
separated by 2D PAGE as described in the Methods section. The three
spots that correspond to the YfnI protein are encircled.
|
|
Reduced Levels of Non-lipoproteins in the Medium of an SPase
II Mutant
The lipoprotein-specific SPase II of B. subtilis has been
shown previously to be indirectly required for the folding and
secretion of the
-amylase AmyQ, a non-lipoprotein (Tjalsma et al.
1999
). To investigate to what extent other secreted proteins are
affected by the absence of SPase II, the extracellular proteome of an
lspA mutant strain was analyzed. Interestingly, protein
secretion was significantly impaired by the lspA mutation, as
evidenced by the fact that the protein content of the culture
supernatant was reduced to ~25% of that of the parental strain
168. More specifically, two abundant extracellular proteins of the
parental strain, the
-amylase AmyE and the protein of unknown
function YolA, were completely absent from the extracellular proteome
of the lspA mutant (compare Fig. 1B and Fig.
5). Furthermore, the relative amounts of a
variety of other extracellular proteins were strongly reduced as
exemplified by the chitosanase Csn, serine proteases Epr, lipase LipA,
glycerophosphoryl diester phosphodiesterase GlpQ, major autolysin LytD,
penicillinase PenP, phage-related proteins XepA, XkdK, XkdM, and XlyA,
and certain proteins of unknown function (YncM, YrpD, YwoF, YxaK, and
YxkC; Table 3). Unexpectedly, we observed a
significant increase in the level of two processed forms of the wall
protease WprA (CWBP23 and CWBP25) in the medium of the lspA
mutant strain. Similarly, the extracellular levels of two typical
lipoproteins, MntA and YxeB, were strongly increased, showing that
these proteins were not effectively retained in the membrane of the
lspA mutant. In contrast, the extracellular levels of the
lipoproteins OppA and YclQ were not affected by the lspA mutation (Fig. 5). Taken together, these findings show that the absence
of SPase II has pleiotropic effects on the composition of the
extracellular proteome.

View larger version (105K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 5
The extracellular proteome of SPase II mutant cells of B. subtilis. Cells of B. subtilis lspA, which
lack SPase II, were grown in L-broth and the proteins in the growth
medium were harvested 1 h after entry into the stationary phase. After
precipitation with TCA, the extracellular proteins were separated by 2D
PAGE as described in the Methods section. The proteins identified by
mass spectrometry are indicated. Extracellular proteins that are
present at elevated levels are encircled, and extracellular proteins
that are present at reduced levels are boxed (see also the listing in
Table 3). This gel is available in the Sub2D proteome database
(http://microbio2.biologie.uni-greifswald.de:8880/).
|
|
Shedding of Lipoproteins and Autolysins by a Diacyl-glyceryl
Transferase Mutant
As indicated above, eight potential lipoproteins were shown to be
present on the extracellular proteome of the parental strain, four in
L-broth (MntA, OppA, YclQ, and YfmC), and four in minimal medium in
response to phosphate starvation (PstS, YcdH, YdhF, and YqiX; Table
1A). In addition, elevated levels of MntA and YxeB were found on the
extracellular proteome of the lspA mutant strains. To further
explore the factors required for lipoprotein processing and retention
in the cell, the composition of the extracellular proteome of an
lgt mutant, which is defective in the lipid-modification of
lipoproteins (Leskelä et al. 1999
), was analyzed. Strikingly, the
extracellular protein pattern of the lgt mutant grown in
L-broth was completely different from that of the parental strain,
exhibiting ~35 additional spots that were not, or only very weakly,
present in the parental pattern (compare Fig. 1B and Fig. 6A; Table
4). Furthermore, the extracellular levels of the predicted lipoproteins OppA and MntA, and several autolytic enzymes were significantly increased by the lgt mutation (Fig. 6A). The latter comprise
YvcE, a predicted cell-wall-binding protein of the endopeptidase II family, the major N-acetylglucosaminidase LytD, and the host cell lysis
enzymes XepA and XlyA encoded by the prophage PBSX. Moreover, the
extracellular level of YwtF, a potential gene regulator similar to
LytR, which is involved in the regulation of autolysins, was significantly increased (Fig. 6A). By use of MALDI-TOF mass
spectrometry, nine of the additional extracellular proteins appearing
in the medium of the lgt mutant were identified. Notably, all
of these are predicted lipoproteins (Table 4), including binding
proteins for the uptake of iron or ferrichrome (FeuA, FhuD, YfiY, and
YxeB), multiple sugars (MsmE), and ribose (RbsB), as well as two
proteins involved in cell-wall metabolism, the penicillin-binding
protein PbpC and the putative D-alanyl-D-alanine carboxypeptidase YodJ. These observations show that cells lacking the diacyl-glyceryl transferase shed lipoproteins and autolysins into their growth medium.



View larger version (222K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 6
The extracellular proteome of diacylglyceryl transferase mutant cells
of B. subtilis. (A) Cells of B. subtilis
lgt, which lack the diacylglyceryl transferase, were grown
in L-broth and proteins in the growth medium were harvested 1 h after
entry into the stationary phase. After precipitation with TCA, the
extracellular proteins were separated by 2D PAGE as described in the
Methods section. The proteins identified by mass spectrometry are
indicated. Non-lipoproteins that are present at elevated levels in the
medium of the lgt strain are printed in bold; lipoproteins
that are released into the medium of the lgt strain are
printed in bold and marked with lipo (see also the listing in
Table 4). This gel is available in the Sub2D proteome database
(http://microbio2.biologie.uni-greifswald.de:8880/). (B).
Comparison of extracellular and cell-associated lipoproteins of
phosphate-starved lgt mutant and parental (168) cells.
Phosphate starvation was provoked by growing the cells in a minimal
medium with limiting amounts of phosphate as described previously
(Antelmann et al. 2000 ). Cellular proteins and proteins in the growth
medium were harvested 1 h after entry into the stationary phase
provoked by phosphate starvation, and samples for 2D PAGE were prepared
as described in the Methods section. The identity of all spots in the
PstS cluster was confirmed by mass spectrometry. Lipoproteins that are
present at increased levels in the medium due to the lgt
mutation are marked with lipo and listed in Table 4.
(C) Transcript analyses of the lytD, yvcE,
oppA, yfiY, yxeB, andmntA genes of
B. subtilis lgt and the parental strain 168. Total
RNA was isolated from cells grown in L-broth at different time points
(1-7), as indicated in the growth curves. For the Northern blotting
experiments, samples of 10 µg of total RNA, containing nearly
identical amounts of rRNA (internal standard), were applied in each
lane.
|
|
Upon phosphate starvation, the lipoproteins PstS (a phosphate-binding
protein) and YdhF are strongly induced and released into the growth
medium of B. subtilis 168 (for review, see Antelmann et al.
2000
). This raised the question as to whether increased amounts of
these two proteins would be shed into the medium of the
phosphate-starved lgt mutant strain. As shown in Figure 6B, this was the case. In addition, the extracellular levels of the predicted lipoproteins OppA, PbpC, YfiY, YusA, and YxeB, which were
also identified when the lgt mutant was grown in L-broth, were
significantly increased (Fig. 6B, data not shown). Finally, the amounts
of four newly identified lipoproteins present in minimal medium were
increased by the lgt mutation. The latter proteins include
binding proteins for the uptake of glycine-betaine (OpuAC), zinc
(YcdH), amino acids (YqiX), and a lipoprotein of unknown function
(YrpE). As shown previously, PstS is one of the major cellular (note
that membrane-attached translocated lipoproteins fractionate with
cells) phosphate starvation-induced proteins (Eymann et al. 1996
), we
investigated the electrophoretic properties of cell-associated PstS in
phosphate-starved lgt mutant cells. Figure 6B shows that PstS
was shifted to a higher Mw and pI compared with the parental strain,
suggesting that these cell-associated forms of PstS might represent
non-modified lipoprotein precursors. Unfortunately, the amino-termini
of these PstS precursors were blocked for sequencing, most likely due
to the presence of an amino-terminal formyl-methionine residue.
To determine whether the shedding of lipoproteins and autolysins in the
lgt mutant is accompanied by increased transcription of the
corresponding genes, Northern hybridization analyses were performed
using specific RNA probes. Thus, the transcription levels of four
lipoprotein-encoding genes (mntA, oppA,
yxeB, and yfiY) and four autolysin-encoding genes
(lytD, yvcE, xlyA, and xepA) in the
lgt mutant strain were compared with the respective
transcription levels in the parental strain in a growth phase-dependent
manner. The results showed that the mRNA levels specific for
oppA, mntA, yvcE (Fig. 6C), xepA,
and xlyA (data not shown) were not significantly influenced by
the lgt mutation. In contrast, the lgt mutant
produced increased amounts of mRNAs specific for the lytD,
yfiY, and yxeB genes during the stationary phase
(Fig. 6C). Taken together, these results indicate that there is no
causal relationship between the shedding of lipoproteins and autolysins
into the growth medium of an lgt mutant strain and the level
of transcription of the corresponding genes.
Protein Shedding by the lgt Mutant Due to Limited Retention
and Proteolytic Shaving
It was shown previously that the lipoprotein PrsA was released as an
unmodified precursor into the medium of a lgt mutant strain of
B. subtilis (Leskelä et al. 1999
). To investigate the mechanism of pre-lipoprotein release by the lgt mutant, the
amino-termini of six released lipoproteins were determined. The results
showed that the released lipoproteins MntA, OppA, YclQ, YfiY, YfmC, and YxeB were all cleaved one residue carboxy-terminally of the predicted site for processing by SPase II, resulting in the loss of the amino-terminal cysteine residue of the membrane-anchored lipoprotein (data not shown). Notably, the same alternative processing was observed
for the OppA and YclQ proteins that were present in the medium of the
parental strain (data not shown). In addition, the shedding of OpuAC
was investigated by Western blotting, by use of the lipoprotein QoxA
(which has two transmembrane segments) as a negative control, and PrsA
as a positive control. Furthermore, the lspA mutant strain was
used to visualize lipid-modified precursor forms of OpuAC, PrsA, and
QoxA. As shown in Figure 7, pre-OpuAC was
released into the medium of the lgt mutant, like pre-PrsA. In
contrast, no pre-QoxA was present in the medium of the lgt mutant strain, showing that the release of pre-OpuAC and pre-PrsA is
not due to cell lysis.

View larger version (79K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 7
Shedding of lipoprotein precursors by diacylglyceryl transferase mutant
cells of B. subtilis. To investigate in which form the
lipoprotein OpuAC is released into the growth medium of lgt
mutant cells, Western blotting experiments were performed with cellular
and growth medium fractions of B. subtilis lgt,
and the control strains 168 and lsp. Furthermore, the PrsA
and QoxA proteins were used as control lipoproteins. Cells were grown
in L-broth at 37°C. Approximately 1 h after entry into the stationary
phase, cells were separated from the growth medium by centrifugation.
Next, extracellular proteins were concentrated by TCA precipitation.
Equivalent amounts of cell and medium fractions were used for SDS-PAGE,
Western blotting and immunodetection with antibodies specific for PrsA
(A), OpuAC (B), or QoxA (C). Unmodified
lipoprotein precursors (white triangles), lipid-modified lipoprotein
precursors (white squares), mature lipoproteins (white circles),
alternatively processed mature-like lipoproteins (black squares), and
degradation products of lipoproteins (black stars) are indicated.
|
|
Finally, as indicated above, the autolysin LytD (95.4 kD) was
detectable in the extracellular proteome of the parental strain in the
form of two proteins of ~45 and 37 kD (Fig. 1B). Compared with the
parental strain, the abundance of the 37-kD product of LytD was
significantly increased in the extracellular proteome of the
lgt mutant (Fig. 6A). Similarly, the YvcE protein (50.8 kD)
was present in the extracellular proteome of the lgt mutant in
the form of two proteins of ~25 and 30 kD, respectively. These observations imply that LytD and YvcE are subject to proteolysis, in
particular in the lgt mutant. In conclusion, our data show that the shedding of lipoproteins and autolysins into the medium of the
lgt mutant is due to proteolysis (shaving) and, in the case of
some lipoproteins, inefficient membrane retention (leakage).
 |
DISCUSSION |
Secretory proteins of eubacteria are known to perform a variety of
very important remote control functions for their survival in the
environment, such as the provision of nutrients, cell-to-cell communication, detoxification of the environment, or the killing of
potential competitors. More specifically, the extracellular proteins of
pathogenic eubacteria seem to play critical roles in virulence. For
these reasons, various studies have been initiated lately to define the
extracellular proteomes of pathogens (for review, see Jungblut et al.
1999
; Rosenkrands et al. 2000
; Lei et al. 2001
; Ziebandt et al. 2001
).
Strikingly, the extracellular proteomes of bacilli, which are among the
organisms known to secrete the largest amounts of proteins, have
remained largely unexplored thus far. In our present studies that build
upon the recent identification of 23 extracellular proteins of B. subtilis 168 (Hirose et al. 2000
), we have defined 62 additional
extracellular proteins of this Gram-positive eubacterium. In addition,
we have monitored, for the first time, how the extracellular proteome
of B. subtillis changes in response to mutations that are
known to affect the synthesis and/or processing of exported
pre-proteins. Most importantly, the present data have allowed a
proteomic verification of our recent genome-wide prediction of protein
export signals of B. subtilis. Even though the process of
protein secretion by B. subtilis has been documented fairly
well (for review, see Tjalsma et al. 2000
), various results were
completely unexpected. These include the export of cytoplasmic
proteins, processing of a native membrane protein by type I SPases, and
the release of 11 normally cell-associated lipoproteins into the growth
medium by a mutant affected in pre-lipoprotein modification and processing.
A total number of 50 identified extracellular proteins has a typical
signal peptide with a cleavage site for SPase I. In addition, the
membrane protein YfnI is cleaved by type I SPases, at an unexpected site (see Table 1). It is interesting to note that, in contrast to our
previous predictions (85%), all of these cleavage sites contain an
alanine residue at the
1 position relative to the scissile peptide
bond (Table 5). Furthermore, the frequency
of phenylalanine at the
2 position is significantly lower, whereas that of tyrosine at the
2 position, and alanine and glutamic acid at
the +1 position, is significantly higher than predicted previously.
Most of these signal peptides are likely to direct the corresponding
proteins into the Sec pathway for protein translocation. Only seven
contain a potential RR motif, suggesting that they could direct
translocation via the Tat pathway. However, Tat-dependent translocation
has, thus far, been shown for only one of these seven proteins (PhoD),
whereas the RR motif of three other proteins (WapA, WprA, and YfkN) is
apparently not recognized by the Tat machinery (Jongbloed et al. 2000
).
Interestingly, the secretion of none of these proteins was
significantly affected by the disruption of single, or even multiple
sip genes for type I SPases. This observation confirms the
view that the presence of either SipS or SipT is sufficient for
efficient precursor processing, and that the type I SPases of B. subtilis have largely overlapping specificities. Surprisingly, the
only exception was the SipT/V-dependent cleavage of the membrane
protein YnfI. This observation is not only remarkable because YfnI is a
polytopic membrane protein, but also because the cleavage site
islocated 44 residues carboxy-terminally of the fifth transmembrane
segment of this protein (see also Hirose et al. 2000
). This suggests
that, despite its distant position relative to the transmembrane
segment, the SPase I cleavage site of YfnI is accessible to the
catalytic sites of SipT and SipV at the extracytoplasmic membrane
surface (Fig. 8A). Similarly, the
extracytoplasmic domains of three other membrane proteins are most
likely liberated from the membrane by proteolysis. In the case of YfkN
and YhcR, this seems to be due to amino-terminal processing by SPase I,
and carboxy-terminal processing by an unknown protease at the membrane
cell-wall interface (Fig. 8B). In contrast, the release of PbpA merely
requires amino-terminal processing, which is probably not catalyzed by
a known SPase, as PbpA lacks a typical SPase I cleavage site (Fig. 8C).

View larger version (45K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 8
Model for the release of proteins with transmembrane segments.
(A) Processing of the polytopic membrane protein YfnI by the
type I signal peptidases SipT and SipV at the AYA cleavage site.
Cleavage occurs carboxy-terminally of A228 (see also Hirose
et al. 2000 ). (B) Cleavage and release of the YfkN and YhcR
proteins, which have a predicted amino-terminal signal peptide and a
potential carboxy-terminal transmembrane segment. Cleavage is catalyzed
by as yet unidentified signal peptidases and/or proteases that are
active at the membrane cell-wall interface. (C) Cleavage and
release of PbpA, which has a predicted amino-terminal transmembrane
segment and lacks a typical SPase cleavage site.
|
|
Unexpectedly, eight predicted lipoproteins were identified on the
extracellular proteome of B. subtilis 168. As some of these lipoproteins were shown to lack the amino-terminal cysteine residue, they are most likely liberated from the cell by proteolytic shaving after their processing by SPase II (Fig.
9A). However, the alternative possibility
that, prior to amino-terminal proteolysis, these lipoproteins are
released by leakage from the membrane, or even a hypothetical release
factor (RF), cannot be excluded presently. For example, active release
from the cytoplasmic membrane has been shown for certain lipoproteins
of Gram-negative eubacteria (for review, see Yakushi et al. 2000
).
Unexpectedly, the release of lipoproteins into the medium was not
affected in the absence of SPase II and, for unknown reasons, the
release of two lipoproteins (MntA and YxeB) was even strongly
increased. This implies that the processing defect in the absence of
SPase II is bypassed by one or more other proteases that catalyze
alternative lipoprotein processing, as shown previously for the
lipoprotein PrsA (Tjalsma et al. 1999
). Conversely, the secretion of
non-lipoproteins was generally reduced in the absence of SPase II. It
is tempting to speculate that the latter effect is due to a reduced
activity of the essential lipoprotein PrsA, a peptidyl prolyl
cis-trans isomerase, which is of major importance for
extracytoplasmic protein folding (Kontinen and Sarvas 1993
; Tjalsma et
al. 1999
). Alternatively, the reduced extracellular protein levels of
the SPase II mutant could, at least in part, be due to the (unexpected)
shedding of the catalytic domain CWBP52 of the wall-associated protease
WprA into the medium. CWBP52 has been shown to degrade translocated
proteins at the membrane cell-wall interface (Stephenson and Harwood
1998
; Bolhuis et al. 1999
), and it might as well degrade extracellular
proteins when shed into the medium in large amounts.

View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 9
Model for the shedding of lipoproteins. (A) Shedding of the
predicted lipoproteins MntA, OppA, PstS, YcdH, YclQ, YdhF, YfmC, and
YqiX into the medium of the parental strain is envisaged in at least
two ways. First, the lipid-modified mature lipoprotein could be
passively (leakage), or actively released from the membrane. Active
release would require a dedicated system (the hypothetical release
factor RF), as described for lipoproteins of E. coli that are
sorted to the outer membrane, or secreted into the growth medium
(Yakushi et al. 2000 ). Thus, although there is no experimental evidence
for this presently, lipid-modified mature lipoproteins could be
secreted by B. subtilis in the form of micelles.
Alternatively, the lipid modification of a released lipoprotein could
be lost due to amino-terminal proteolysis. Second, lipid-modified
mature lipoproteins could be shaved from the membrane by amino-terminal
proteolysis. (B) Lipoprotein shedding by B. subtilis
lgt can be envisaged to take place in at least two ways.
First, unmodified translocated pre-lipoproteins, such as OpuAC and
PrsA, could either leak from the membrane, or be actively released into
the growth medium by a (hypothetical) release factor (RF). Next, the
released pre-lipoproteins could form micel-like structures, or be
subject to amino-terminal proteolysis. The latter would result in the
presence of mature-like forms in the growth medium as observed for
MntA, OppA, YclQ, YfiY, YfmC, and YxeB. Second, these unmodified
pre-lipoproteins could be shaved from the membrane by amino-terminal
proteolysis.
|
|
Lipoprotein shedding was dramatically increased in the absence of the
diacylglyceryl transferase Lgt, 11 additional lipoproteins being
detectable in the extracellular proteome. Our present observations indicate that there are at least two mechanisms by which this phenomenon can be explained. First, unmodified pre-lipoproteins, such
as pre-PrsA (Leskelä et al. 1999
) and pre-OpuAC, could be actively or passively released from the membrane (Fig. 9B). Passive release of these pre-proteins might be explained by the fact that the
hydrophobic H regions of their signal peptides are too short to span
the membrane completely (Table 1A; Tjalsma et al. 2000
). Nevertheless,
the H region of the signal peptide of PstS appears to be sufficiently
hydrophobic to retain the unmodified pre-protein in the membrane.
Second, pre-lipoproteins might be released by proteolytic shaving, as
evidenced by the fact that at least six extracellular lipoproteins were
processed alternatively, lacking the cysteine residue at the +1
position of the mature lipoprotein. However, the latter proteolytic
event might as well occur after the release of unmodified
pre-lipoproteins from the membrane (Fig. 9B). Proteolytic shaving might
also explain the shedding of two autolysins, LytD and YvcE, by the
lgt mutant. In contrast, it is presently even less clear how
the shedding of the other autolysins, all of which are
non-lipoproteins, has to be explained. One possibility is that this
phenomenon is caused by changes in the cell wall. These could be due to
the malfunction of lipoproteins, which are directly or indirectly
involved in cell-wall biogenesis (e.g., DacA, LytA, PbpC, Slp). If so,
the function of such lipoproteins would be more strongly affected by
the absence of Lgt than the absence of SPase II. Alternatively,
lipoprotein malfunction in the lgt mutant might provoke
certain undefined stress responses that lead to the shedding of
autolysins. The latter idea would be consistent with the observation
that the transcription of at least three genes, including the gene for
the major autolysin LytD, was increased in the lgt mutant.
Thus, induced autolysins, such as LytD, might loosen the peptidoglycan
network of the cell wall, thereby causing the shedding of other
non-induced autolysins as observed. This view would be supported by the
fact that a lytD mutant is affected in protein secretion
(Blackman 1998
).
The extracellular proteins lacking a typical secretion signal can reach
the medium via several routes. First, the five phage-related proteins
that were identified have the potential to be secreted via the PBSX
prophage-encoded holin XhlB (Longchamp et al. 1994
; Krogh et al. 1998
),
or the SP
prophage-encoded holins BhlA and BhlB (Regamey and
Karamata 1998
). Such holins have the potential to oligomerize in the
membrane, forming a pore through which the lytic enzymes of
bacteriophages, which usually lack a signal peptide, gain access to the
cell wall (Young and Bläsi 1992
). Second, flagellin and two
flagellar hook-associated proteins are, most likely, exported via a
dedicated machinery for the assembly of flagella, which is related to
the type III secretion machineries of Gram-negative eubacteria (Hueck
et al. 1998
; Namba et al. 1989
). Subsequently, these proteins could be
released from the (damaged) flagella. Third, the 13 remaining proteins
that lack a signal peptide could be released by (partial) cell lysis,
which would be in accord with the relatively high extracellular levels
of the major autolysin LytD and the murein hydrolase YwtD. If so, these
13 proteins would be significantly more resistant to degradation by
extracellular proteases than the large majority of cytoplasmic proteins. However, the possibility that such proteins escape from the
cytoplasm via holins, as recently proposed for Lactococcus lactis (Walker and Klaenhammer 2001
), or other (unidentified) protein export pathways, cannot be excluded presently It has to be
noted that cytoplasmic proteins, such as aldolase, enolase, elongation
factor G, GroEL, and various dehydrogenases, have also been detected in
the extracellular proteomes of other eubacteria, such as group A
streptococci (for review, see Lei et al. 2000
) and mycobacteria
(Jungblut et al. 1999
; Rosenkrands et al. 2000
). Strikingly, ~60% of
the identified extracellular proteins of these organisms lacked a
typical signal peptide. By analogy to the fact that at least some of
the latter proteins of group A streptococci play an active role in
host-pathogen interactions (for review, see Lei et al. 2000
), it is
conceivable that some of the equivalent extracellular proteins of
B. subtilis support the survival of this organism in its
natural habitats, the soil and rhizosphere.
Finally, our proteomic studies provide a first inventory of the
numerous degradative enzymes involved in the metabolism of carbohydrates, proteins, lipids, nucleotides, or phosphate that are
predominantly secreted during the stationary phase, when the availability of nutrients becomes limiting. These enzymes ensure the
cell's survival during the stationary phase by giving access to
alternative nutrient resources. Most importantly, our present observations with the degU32(hy) mutant document for the first time that a subset of 13 degradative enzymes is positively regulated by
DegU-phosphate, which starts to accumulate at the end of exponential growth (Ayusaw et al. 1975
; Lepesant et al. 1972
). Conversely, our
results support the view that all members of the
D
regulon, including flagellin, FlgK, FliD, and the major autolysin LytD
(Helmann et al. 1988
; Mirel and Chamberlin 1989
; Kuroda and Sekiguchi
1993
; Marquez-Magana and Chamberlin 1994
), are negatively regulated by
DegU phosphate. In addition, the murein hydrolase YwtD, and two
proteins of unknown function (YlqB and YxkC), also seem to be regulated
by
D, as these proteins are absent from the extracellular
proteomes of a degU32(hy) mutant, as well as a sigD
mutant (H. Antelmann, H. Tjalsma, B. Voigt, S. Ohlmeier, S. Bron, J.M.
van Dijl, and M. Hecker, unpubl.).
In conclusion, we have used the power of the high-resolution proteomic
technique to get novel insights into the general flow of proteins into
the environment of B. subtilis 168. Specifically, our
observations shed new light on signal peptide function, the role of
signal peptide processing, the importance of signal peptide-independent protein export pathways, the regulation of secretory proteins, and the
function of extracellular proteins in general. Consequently, we are
convinced that they will serve as major leads for future research on
protein transport in B. subtilis and other Gram-positive bacteria that are genetically less amenable than B. subtilis.
 |
METHODS |
Plasmids, Bacterial Strains, and Growth Conditions
The bacterial strains and plasmids used are listed in Table
6. B. subtilis strains were grown under
vigorous agitation at 37°C in L-broth. A phosphate-starvation
response was provoked by growing the bacteria in a minimal medium
containing 0.16 mM KH2PO4 (Antelmann et al. 2000
).
Antibiotics were used in the following concentrations: chloramphenicol
(Cm), 5 µg/mL; erythromycin (Em), 1 µg/mL; kanamycin (Km), 10 µg/mL; spectinomycin (Sp), 100 µg/mL; tetracycline (Tc), 6 µg/mL;
ampicillin (Ap), 50 µg /mL.
DNA Techniques
Procedures for DNA purification, restriction, ligation, agarose gel
electrophoresis, and transformation in Escherichia. coli were
carried out as described (Sambrook et al. 1989
). Enzymes were from
Roche Molecular Biochemicals. PCR was carried out with the Pwo DNA
polymerase (New England Biolabs) as described (van Dijl et al. 1995
).
B. subtilis was transformed as described previously (Tjalsma
et al. 1998
). Single or multiple sip mutations were introduced in B. subtilis 168 by transformation with chromosomal DNA of
B. subtilis 8G5 containing the sipS-Km (
S),
sipT-Cm (
T), sipU-Km (
U), sipV-Sp
(
V), sipW-Tc (
W), or lspA-Em (
lspA)
disruptions (Bolhuis et al. 1996
; Tjalsma et al. 1997
, 1998
, 1999
). All
chromosomal integrations were verified by PCR.
Analysis of Transcription
Total RNA of B. subtilis was isolated from cells grown in
L-broth at different time points during growth using the acidic phenol
method of Majumdar et al. (1991)
. Northern blotting was performed as
described previously (Wetzstein et al. 1992
). Briefly, internal
fragments of the yxeB, yfiY, mntA, oppA, lytD, yvcE, xlyA, and
xepA genes were first amplified with primers listed in Table
6. Note that the 3' primer for each of the amplified genes contains a
T7 promoter sequence. Next, the amplified fragments were used for the
T7 RNA polymerase-directed in vitro synthesis of digoxigenin-labeled
gene-specific RNA probes.
Preparation of Cytoplasmic Protein Fractions
Cells grown in phosphate starvation minimal medium were collected
by centrifugation 1 h after their entry into the stationary growth
phase. Cells were washed twice with 10 mM Tris-HCl, 1 mM EDTA (pH 7.5),
and disrupted by sonication (Antelmann et al. 2000
). Crude protein
extracts were separated from cellular debris by repeated centrifugation
for 30 min at 4°C and 15,000 rpm. The protein content of the
supernatant fraction was determined according to Bradford (1976)
and 80 µg of the crude protein extract was resuspended in 400 µL of
immobilized pH gradient (IPG) reswelling solution containing 2 M
thiourea, 8 M urea, 1% Nonidet P-40, 20 mM DTT, and 0.5% Pharmalyte
(pH 3-10). This sample containing reswelling solution was used for the
overnight rehydration of IPG strips in the pH range 3-10. Isoelectric
focusing was performed as recommended by the manufacturer (Amersham
Pharmacia Biotech). SDS-PAGE in the second dimension was performed as
described previously (Antelmann et al. 2000
), and the resulting 2D gels
were stained with silver nitrate according to Blum et al. (1987)
. It
has to be noted that integral membrane proteins are poorly resolved by the IPG technique due to their hydrophobicity. Consequently, only cytoplasmic proteins and membrane-bound lipoproteins are separated by
2D PAGE.
Preparation of the Extracellular Protein Fraction
B. subtilis cells were grown in 750 mL of L-broth and
samples of 250 mL were harvested during exponential growth
(OD540 = 0.4), the transition into the stationary phase
(t0), or 1 h after the transition into the stationary phase
(t1). Cells were removed from the growth medium by
centrifugation for 20 min at 4°C and 10,000 rpm. Next, proteins in
the medium were precipitated with ice-cold 10% (w/v) trichloroacetic
acid (TCA), and collected by centrifugation (40,000g, 45 min,
4°C). The resulting protein pellet was scraped from the wall of the
centrifuge tube with a spatula, washed three times with 96% ethanol
(v/v) and dried. The extracellular protein fraction of
phosphate-starved cells was prepared as described previously (Antelmann
et al. 2000
). The dried protein pellets were resolved in a solution
containing 2 M thiourea and 8 M urea and, subsequently, insoluble
material was removed by centrifugation. The protein concentration of
the resulting extracellular protein sample was determined according to
Bradford (1976)
, and the volume of an equivalent of 80 µg of this
sample was adjusted to 360 µL with the thiourea/urea solution. Next,
40 µL of a 10-fold concentrated reswelling solution was added
containing 2 M thiourea, 8 M urea, 10% Nonidet P-40, 200 mM DTT, and
5% Pharmalyte (pH 3-10). This sample containing reswelling solution
was used for the rehydration of IPG strips in the pH range of 3-10. 2D
PAGE and gel staining were performed as described above.
Protein Identification
For the identification of proteins by mass spectrometry, protein
samples of 1 mg were separated by preparative 2D PAGE, and the gels
were stained with Coomassie blue R250. In-gel tryptic digestion of the
excised protein spots was performed by use of a peptide-collecting
device (Otto et al. 1996
). A 0.5 µL peptide solution was mixed with
an equal volume of a saturated
-cyano-4-hydroxy cinnamic acid
solution in 50% acetonitrile and 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid (v/v), and
applied to a sample template of a MALDI-TOF mass spectrometer (Voyager
DE-STR, PerSeptive Biosystems). Peptide mass fingerprints were analyzed
using the MS-Fit software as provided by Baker and
Clausner (UCSF Mass Spectrometry Facility, San Francisco) through
http://prospector.ucsf.edu. For N-terminal sequencing, preparative 2D
gels were blotted onto a pPVDF membrane and the membrane was stained
with Coomassie blue R250. The excised protein spots were applied to an
Applied Biosystems Procise Sequencer and N-terminal sequencing was
performed by ChromaTec GmbH Greifswald. Identified spots in different
gels were matched manually.
Western Blotting and Immunodetection
To detect OpuAC, PrsA, and QoxA, B. subtilis cells were
separated from the growth medium by centrifugation (2 min, 14,000 rpm,
room temperature). Proteins in the growth medium were concentrated 20-fold upon precipitation with TCA, and samples for SDS-PAGE were
prepared as described previously (van Dijl et al. 1991
). After
separation by SDS-PAGE, proteins were transferred to a PVDF membrane
(Millipore Corporation) as described by Kyhse-Andersen (1984)
. OpuAC,
PrsA, and QoxA were visualized with specific antibodies and alkaline
phosphatase-conjugated goat anti-rabbit antibodies (SIGMA) as described
previously (Lemma et al. 1995
; Kappes et al. 1999
; Tjalsma et al. 1999
).
We thank Karin Binder and Renate Gloger for expert technical
assistance, the members of the Groningen and European Bacillus Secretion Groups (http://www.ncl.ac.uk/ebsg) for stimulating
discussions, and Dr. V.P. Kontinen, Prof. Dr. E. Bremer, and Dr. A. Kröger for providing specific antisera against PrsA, OpuAC, and QoxA, respectively. We also thank Christian Scharf for the establishment and
support of mass spectrometry in the laboratory of Michael Hecker. H.A.,
B.V., S.O., and M.H. were supported by grants from the Deutsche
Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG), the Bundesministerium für Bildung,
Wissenschaft, Forschung und Technologie (BMFT), and the Fonds der
Chemischen Industrie to M.H. H.T. was supported by Genencor
International (Leiden, the Netherlands). J.M.v.D., S.B., and M.H.
were supported in part by European Union Grants QLK3-CT-1999-00413 and
QLK3-CT-1999-00917.
The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by payment
of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in accordance with 18 USC section 1734 solely to
indicate this fact.
Article and publication are at
http://www.genome.org/cgi/doi/10.1101/gr.182801.