Genome Research scroll

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Genome Res. 17:1547-1549, 2007
©2007 by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; ISSN 1088-9051/07 $5.00
OPEN ACCESS ARTICLE
This Article
OPEN ACCESS ARTICLE
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Green, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Green, P.
Related Content
Right arrowRelated Article
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Commentary

2x genomes—Does depth matter?

Phil Green

Department of Genome Sciences and Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA

The first 100 words of the full text of this article appear below.

This issue of Genome Research marks the publication by collaborators at the NIH, Agencourt Bioscience, and the Broad Institute of a genome sequence for the domestic cat Felis catus (Pontius et al. 2007Go). It was obtained by a whole-genome shotgun approach in which, on average, each genomic base is represented in roughly two sequence reads ("2x" redundancy), a level at which there remain many gaps in the sequence due to statistical fluctuations in read placement, biases in subclone libraries, and assembly difficulties. In all, the NHGRI is sponsoring 24 such "low redundancy" mammalian genome sequences, 17 of . . . [Full Text of this Article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Related Article

Initial sequence and comparative analysis of the cat genome
Joan U. Pontius, James C. Mullikin, Douglas R. Smith, Agencourt Sequencing Team, Kerstin Lindblad-Toh, Sante Gnerre, Michele Clamp, Jean Chang, Robert Stephens, Beena Neelam, Natalia Volfovsky, Alejandro A. Schäffer, Richa Agarwala, Kristina Narfström, William J. Murphy, Urs Giger, Alfred L. Roca, Agostinho Antunes, Marilyn Menotti-Raymond, Naoya Yuhki, Jill Pecon-Slattery, Warren E. Johnson, Guillaume Bourque, Glenn Tesler, NISC Comparative Sequencing Program, and Stephen J. O’Brien
Genome Res. 2007 17: 1675-1689. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Integr. Comp. Biol.Home page
C. L. Organ, R. G. Moreno, and S. V. Edwards
Three tiers of genome evolution in reptiles
Integr. Comp. Biol., June 21, 2008; (2008) icn046v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
F. Zhao, F. Zhao, T. Li, and D. A. Bryant
A new pheromone trail-based genetic algorithm for comparative genome assembly
Nucleic Acids Res., June 1, 2008; 36(10): 3455 - 3462.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Genome Res.Home page
E. H. Margulies
Confidence in comparative genomics
Genome Res., February 1, 2008; 18(2): 199 - 200.
[Full Text] [PDF]




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Genes Dev. Learn. Mem.
Protein Science RNA Genome Res.
Copyright © 2007 by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.