Genome Research

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gregory, T. R.
Right arrow Articles by Hebert, P. D.N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gregory, T. R.
Right arrow Articles by Hebert, P. D.N.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Substance via MeSH
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Vol. 9, Issue 4, 317-324, April 1999

REVIEW
The Modulation of DNA Content: Proximate Causes and Ultimate Consequences

T. Ryan Gregory,1 and Paul D.N. Hebert

Department of Zoology, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1, Canada

The forces responsible for modulating the large-scale features of the genome remain one of the most difficult issues confronting evolutionary biology. Although diversity in chromosomal architecture, nucleotide composition, and genome size has been well documented, there is little understanding of either the evolutionary origins or impact of much of this variation. The 80,000-fold divergence in genome sizes among eukaryotes represents perhaps the greatest challenge for genomic holists. Although some researchers continue to characterize much variation in genome size as a mere by-product of an intragenomic selfish DNA "free-for-all" there is increasing evidence for the primacy of selection in molding genome sizes via impacts on cell size and division rates. Moreover, processes inducing quantum or doubling series variation in gametic or somatic genome sizes are common. These abrupt shifts have broad effects on phenotypic attributes at both cellular and organismal levels and may play an important role in explaining episodes of rapid---or even saltational---character state evolution.


1   Corresponding author.


9:317-324 ©1999 by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press  ISSN 1088-9051/99 $5.00

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
M. Boulesteix, M. Weiss, and C. Biemont
Differences in Genome Size Between Closely Related Species: The Drosophila melanogaster Species Subgroup
Mol. Biol. Evol., January 1, 2006; 23(1): 162 - 167.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J HeredHome page
A. J. R. Hickey and K. D. Clements
Genome Size Evolution in New Zealand Triplefin Fishes
J. Hered., July 1, 2005; 96(4): 356 - 362.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PaleobiologyHome page
J. Brosius
Disparity, adaptation, exaptation, bookkeeping, and contingency at the genome level
Paleobiology, June 1, 2005; 31(2_Suppl): 1 - 16.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
T. R. GREGORY
The C-value Enigma in Plants and Animals: A Review of Parallels and an Appeal for Partnership
Ann. Bot., January 1, 2005; 95(1): 133 - 146.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
J. GREILHUBER, J. DOLEZEL, M. A. LYSAK, and M. D. BENNETT
The Origin, Evolution and Proposed Stabilization of the Terms 'Genome Size' and 'C-Value' to Describe Nuclear DNA Contents
Ann. Bot., January 1, 2005; 95(1): 255 - 260.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Genome Res.Home page
C. E. Grover, H. Kim, R. A. Wing, A. H. Paterson, and J. F. Wendel
Incongruent Patterns of Local and Global Genome Size Evolution in Cotton
Genome Res., August 1, 2004; 14(8): 1474 - 1482.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
F. BALUSKA, D. VOLKMANN, and P. W. BARLOW
Eukaryotic Cells and their Cell Bodies: Cell Theory Revised
Ann. Bot., July 1, 2004; 94(1): 9 - 32.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PaleobiologyHome page
Macroevolution, hierarchy theory, and the C-value enigma
Paleobiology, June 1, 2004; 30(2): 179 - 202.



Home page
J HeredHome page
T. R. Gregory and D. P. Shorthouse
Genome Sizes of Spiders
J. Hered., July 1, 2003; 94(4): 285 - 290.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.Home page
R. v. STERNBERG
On the Roles of Repetitive DNA Elements in the Context of a Unified Genomic-Epigenetic System
Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., December 1, 2002; 981(1): 154 - 188.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
S. E. Ptak and D. A. Petrov
How Intron Splicing Affects the Deletion and Insertion Profile in Drosophila melanogaster
Genetics, November 1, 2002; 162(3): 1233 - 1244.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
H. Amiri, C. M. Alsmark, and S. G. E. Andersson
Proliferation and Deterioration of Rickettsia Palindromic Elements
Mol. Biol. Evol., August 1, 2002; 19(8): 1234 - 1243.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
C. Vieira, C. Nardon, C. Arpin, D. Lepetit, and C. Biemont
Evolution of Genome Size in Drosophila. Is the Invader's Genome Being Invaded by Transposable Elements?
Mol. Biol. Evol., July 1, 2002; 19(7): 1154 - 1161.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Histochem. Cytochem.Home page
D. C. Hardie, T. R. Gregory, and P. D.N. Hebert
From Pixels to Picograms: A Beginners' Guide to Genome Quantification by Feulgen Image Analysis Densitometry
J. Histochem. Cytochem., June 1, 2002; 50(6): 735 - 750.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Genes Dev. Learn. Mem.
Protein Science RNA Genome Res.