Genome Research songbird

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print December 14, 2007, 10.1101/gr.7046608
Genome Res. 18:221-232, 2008
©2008 by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; ISSN 1088-9051/08 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Research Data
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
gr.7046608v1
18/2/221    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Prachumwat, A.
Right arrow Articles by Li, W.-H.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Prachumwat, A.
Right arrow Articles by Li, W.-H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Letter

Gene number expansion and contraction in vertebrate genomes with respect to invertebrate genomes

Anuphap Prachumwat and Wen-Hsiung Li1

Department of Ecology and Evolution, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637, USA

Where did vertebrate genes come from? Here we address this question by analyzing eight completely sequenced land vertebrate genomes and six completely sequenced invertebrate genomes. Approximately 70% of the vertebrate genes can be found in the six invertebrate genomes with the standard homology search criteria (denoted as V.MCL), another ~6% can be found with relaxed search criteria, and an additional ~2% can be found in sequenced fungal and bacterial genomes. Thus, a substantial proportion of vertebrate genes (~22%) cannot be found in the nonvertebrate genomes studied (denoted as Vonly). Interestingly, genes in Vonly are predominantly singletons, while the majority of genes in the other three groups belong to gene families. The proteins of Vonly tend to evolve faster than those of V.MCL. Surprisingly, in many cases the family sizes in V.MCL are only as large as or even smaller than their counterparts in the invertebrates, contrary to the general perception of a larger family size in vertebrates. Interestingly, in comparison with the family size in invertebrates, vertebrate gene families involved in regulation, signal transduction, transcription, protein transport, and protein modification tend to be expanded, whereas those involved in metabolic processes tend to be contracted. Furthermore, for almost all of the functional categories with family size expansion in vertebrates, the number of gene types (i.e., the number of singletons plus the number of gene families) tends to be over-represented in Vonly, but under-represented in V.MCL. Our study suggests that gene function is a major determinant of gene family size.


1 Corresponding author.

E-mail whli{at}uchicago.edu; fax (773) 702-9740.

[Supplemental material is available online at www.genome.org.]

Article published online before print. Article and publication date are at http://www.genome.org/cgi/doi/10.1101/gr.7046608


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Genes Dev. Learn. Mem.
Protein Science RNA Genome Res.
Copyright © 2008 by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.