Genome Research songbird

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Genome Res. 18:201-205, 2008
©2008 by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; ISSN 1088-9051/08 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cooper, G. M.
Right arrow Articles by Brown, C. D.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cooper, G. M.
Right arrow Articles by Brown, C. D.
Related Content
Right arrowRelated Article
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Perspective

Qualifying the relationship between sequence conservation and molecular function

Gregory M. Cooper1,3,4 and Christopher D. Brown2,3

1 Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA; 2 Institute for Genomics and Systems Biology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637, USA

Quantification of evolutionary constraints via sequence conservation can be leveraged to annotate genomic functional sequences. Recent efforts addressing the converse of this relationship have identified many sites in metazoan genomes with molecular function but without detectable conservation between related species. Here, we discuss explanations and implications for these results considering both practical and theoretical issues. In particular, phylogenetic scope influences the relationship between sequence conservation and function. Comparisons of distantly related species can detect constraint with high specificity due to the loss of conserved neutral sequence, but sensitivity is sacrificed as a result of functional changes related to lineage-specific biology. The strength of natural selection operating on functional sequence is also important. Mutations to functional sequences that result in small fitness effects are subject to weaker constraints. Therefore, particularly when comparing highly divergent species, functional sequences that are degenerate or biologically redundant will be prone to turnover, wherein functional sequences are replaced by effectively equivalent, but nonorthologous counterparts. Finally, considering the size and complexity of metazoan genomes and the fact that many nonconserved sequences are associated with sequence-degenerate, low-level molecular functions, we find it likely that there exist many biochemically functional sequences that are not under constraint. This hypothesis does not lead to the conclusion that huge amounts of vertebrate genomes are functionally important, but rather that such "functionality" represents molecular noise that has weak or no effect on organismal phenotypes.


3 These authors contributed equally to this work.

4 Corresponding author.

E-mail coopergm{at}u.washington.edu; fax (206) 221-5795.

Article is online at http://www.genome.org/cgi/doi/10.1101/gr.7205808


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Related Article

Metrics of sequence constraint overlook regulatory sequences in an exhaustive analysis at phox2b
David M. McGaughey, Ryan M. Vinton, Jimmy Huynh, Amr Al-Saif, Michael A. Beer, and Andrew S. McCallion
Genome Res. 2008 18: 252-260. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]






Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Genes Dev. Learn. Mem.
Protein Science RNA Genome Res.
Copyright © 2008 by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.