Genome Research cityscape

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print November 21, 2007, 10.1101/gr.6984908
Genome Res. 18:172-177, 2008
©2008 by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; ISSN 1088-9051/08 $5.00
OPEN ACCESS ARTICLE
This Article
OPEN ACCESS ARTICLE
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Research Data
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
gr.6984908v1
18/1/172    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Torres, T. T.
Right arrow Articles by Schlötterer, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Torres, T. T.
Right arrow Articles by Schlötterer, C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Methods

Gene expression profiling by massively parallel sequencing

Tatiana Teixeira Torres1, Muralidhar Metta1, Birgit Ottenwälder2, and Christian Schlötterer1,3

1 Institut für Tierzucht und Genetik, Veterinärmedizinische Universität Wien, 1210 Vienna, Austria; 2 Eurofins Medigenomix GmbH, 82152 Martinsried, Germany

Massively parallel sequencing holds great promise for expression profiling, as it combines the high throughput of SAGE with the accuracy of EST sequencing. Nevertheless, until now only very limited information had been available on the suitability of the current technology to meet the requirements. Here, we evaluate the potential of 454 sequencing technology for expression profiling using Drosophila melanogaster. We show that short (< ~80 bp) and long (> ~300–400 bp) cDNA fragments are under-represented in 454 sequence reads. Nevertheless, sequencing of 3' cDNA fragments generated by nebulization could be used to overcome the length bias of the 454 sequencing technology. Gene expression measurements generated by restriction analysis and nebulization for fragments within the 80- to 300-bp range showed correlations similar to those reported for replicated microarray experiments (0.83–0.91); 97% of the cDNA fragments could be unambiguously mapped to the genomic DNA, demonstrating the advantage of longer sequence reads. Our analyses suggest that the 454 technology has a large potential for expression profiling, and the high mapping accuracy indicates that it should be possible to compare expression profiles across species.


3 Corresponding author.

E-mail christian.schloetterer@vu-wien.ac.at; fax 43-1-250775693.

[Supplemental material is available online at www.genome.org. The EST sequences have been deposited in GenBank under accession nos. EV574767–EV600806.]

Article published online before print. Article and publication date are at http://www.genome.org/cgi/doi/10.1101/gr.6984908


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
N. C. Collins, F. Tardieu, and R. Tuberosa
Quantitative Trait Loci and Crop Performance under Abiotic Stress: Where Do We Stand?
Plant Physiology, June 1, 2008; 147(2): 469 - 486.
[Full Text] [PDF]




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Genes Dev. Learn. Mem.
Protein Science RNA Genome Res.
Copyright © 2008 by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.