This Article OPEN ACCESS ARTICLE Full Text Full Text (PDF) Supplemental Research Data Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Copley, R. R. Articles by Udalova, I. A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Copley, R. R. Articles by Udalova, I. A. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Letter

Functional conservation of Rel binding sites in drosophilid genomes

¹ Wellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, Oxford University, Oxford OX3 7BN, United Kingdom; ² Molsoft L.L.C. La Jolla, California 92037, USA; ³ Kennedy Institute of Rheumatology, Imperial College, London W6 8LH, United Kingdom

Evolutionary constraints on gene regulatory elements are poorly understood: Little is known about how the strength of transcription factor binding correlates with DNA sequence conservation, and whether transcription factor binding sites can evolve rapidly while retaining their function. Here we use the model of the NFKB/Rel-dependent gene regulation in divergent Drosophila species to examine the hypothesis that the functional properties of authentic transcription factor binding sites are under stronger evolutionary constraints than the genomic background. Using molecular modeling we compare tertiary structures of the Drosophila Rel family proteins Dorsal, Dif, and Relish and demonstrate that their DNA-binding and protein dimerization domains undergo distinct rates of evolution. The accumulated amino acid changes, however, are unlikely to affect DNA sequence recognition and affinity. We employ our recently developed microarray-based experimental platform and principal coordinates statistical analysis to quantitatively and systematically profile DNA binding affinities of three Drosophila Rel proteins to 10,368 variants of the NFKB recognition sequences. We then correlate the evolutionary divergence of gene regulatory regions with differences in DNA binding affinities. Genome-wide analyses reveal a significant increase in the number of conserved Rel binding sites in promoters of developmental and immune genes. Significantly, the affinity of Rel proteins to these sites was higher than to less conserved sites and was maintained by the conservation of the DNA binding site sequence (static conservation) or in some cases despite significantly diverged sequences (dynamic conservation). We discuss how two types of conservation may contribute to the stabilization and optimization of a functional gene regulatory code in evolution.

E-mail i.udalova{at}imperial.ac.uk; fax 44-208-3834499.

E-mail copley{at}well.ox.ac.uk; fax 44-1865-287664.

[Supplemental material is available online at www.genome.org.]

Article is online at http://www.genome.org/cgi/doi/10.1101/gr.6490707

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?