This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: gr.6406307v1 17/9/1245    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Pheasant, M. Articles by Mattick, J. S. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Pheasant, M. Articles by Mattick, J. S. Related Content Related Articles Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Perspective

Raising the estimate of functional human sequences

ARC Special Research Centre for Functional and Applied Genomics, Institute for Molecular Bioscience, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland 4072, Australia

While less than 1.5% of the mammalian genome encodes proteins, it is now evident that the vast majority is transcribed, mainly into non-protein-coding RNAs. This raises the question of what fraction of the genome is functional, i.e., composed of sequences that yield functional products, are required for the expression (regulation or processing) of these products, or are required for chromosome replication and maintenance. Many of the observed noncoding transcripts are differentially expressed, and, while most have not yet been studied, increasing numbers are being shown to be functional and/or trafficked to specific subcellular locations, as well as exhibit subtle evidence of selection. On the other hand, analyses of conservation patterns indicate that only 5% (3%–8%) of the human genome is under purifying selection for functions common to mammals. However, these estimates rely on the assumption that reference sequences (usually ancient transposon-derived sequences) have evolved neutrally, which may not be the case, and if so would lead to an underestimate of the fraction of the genome under evolutionary constraint. These analyses also do not detect functional sequences that are evolving rapidly and/or have acquired lineage-specific functions. Indeed, many regulatory sequences and known functional noncoding RNAs, including many microRNAs, are not conserved over significant evolutionary distances, and recent evidence from the ENCODE project suggests that many functional elements show no detectable level of sequence constraint. Thus, it is likely that much more than 5% of the genome encodes functional information, and although the upper bound is unknown, it may be considerably higher than currently thought.

E-mail j.mattick{at}imb.uq.edu.au; fax 61-7-3346-2111.

Article published online before print. Article and publication date are at http://www.genome.org/cgi/doi/10.1101/gr.6406307

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

Related Articles

What is a gene, post-ENCODE? History and updated definition

Mark B. Gerstein, Can Bruce, Joel S. Rozowsky, Deyou Zheng, Jiang Du, Jan O. Korbel, Olof Emanuelsson, Zhengdong D. Zhang, Sherman Weissman, and Michael Snyder
Genome Res. 2007 17: 669-681. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. E Dinger, T. R Mercer, and J. S Mattick RNAs as extracellular signaling molecules J. Mol. Endocrinol., April 1, 2008; 40(4): 151 - 159. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. P. Amaral, M. E. Dinger, T. R. Mercer, and J. S. Mattick The Eukaryotic Genome as an RNA Machine Science, March 28, 2008; 319(5871): 1787 - 1789. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y. R. Bendana and I. H. Holmes Colorstock, SScolor, Raton: RNA alignment visualization tools Bioinformatics, February 15, 2008; 24(4): 579 - 580. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Ashburner Drosophila Genomes by the Baker's Dozen Genetics, November 1, 2007; 177(3): 1263 - 1268. [Full Text] [PDF]