This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Supplemental Research Data All Versions of this Article: gr.5542607v1 17/1/33    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Ichiyanagi, K. Articles by Okada, N. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Ichiyanagi, K. Articles by Okada, N. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Letter

Novel retrotransposon analysis reveals multiple mobility pathways dictated by hosts

Department of Biological Sciences, Graduate School of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Midori-ku, Yokohama 226-8501, Japan

Autonomous non-long-terminal-repeat retrotransposons (NLRs) proliferate by retrotransposition via coordinated reactions of target DNA cleavage and reverse transcription by a mechanism called target-primed reverse transcription (TPRT). Whereas this mechanism guarantees the covalent attachment of the NLR and its target site at the 3' junction, mechanisms for the joining at the 5' junction have been conjectural. To better understand the retrotransposition pathways, we analyzed target–NLR junctions of zebrafish NLRs with a new method of identifying genomic copies that reside within other transposons, termed "target analysis of nested transposons" (TANT). Application of the TANT method revealed various features of the zebrafish NLR integrants; for example, half of the integrants carry extra nucleotides at the 5' junction, which is in stark contrast to the major human NLR, LINE-1. Interestingly, in a cell culture assay, retrotransposition of the zebrafish NLR in heterologous human cells did not bear extra 5' nucleotides, indicating that the choice of the 5' joining pathway is affected by the host. Our results suggest that several pathways exist for NLR retrotransposition and argue in favor of host protein involvement. With genomic sequence information accumulating exponentially, our data demonstrate the general applicability of the TANT method for the analysis of a wide variety of retrotransposons.

E-mail nokada{at}bio.titech.ac.jp fax: 81-45-924-5835.

[Supplemental material is available online at www.genome.org.]

Article published online before print. Article and publication date are at http://www.genome.org/cgi/doi/10.1101/gr.5542607

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K. Ichiyanagi and N. Okada Mobility Pathways for Vertebrate L1, L2, CR1, and RTE Clade Retrotransposons Mol. Biol. Evol., June 1, 2008; 25(6): 1148 - 1157. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Ichiyanagi, H. Nishihara, D. D. Duvernell, and N. Okada Acquisition of Endonuclease Specificity during Evolution of L1 Retrotransposon Mol. Biol. Evol., September 1, 2007; 24(9): 2009 - 2015. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. K. Sen, C. T. Huang, K. Han, and M. A. Batzer Endonuclease-independent insertion provides an alternative pathway for L1 retrotransposition in the human genome Nucleic Acids Res., June 28, 2007; 35(11): 3741 - 3751. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]