This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Supplemental Research Data All Versions of this Article: gr.5488207v1 17/1/108    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Khattra, J. Articles by Marra, M. A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Khattra, J. Articles by Marra, M. A. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Methods

Large-scale production of SAGE libraries from microdissected tissues, flow-sorted cells, and cell lines

¹ Canada’s Michael Smith Genome Sciences Centre, BC Cancer Research Centre, BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia V5Z 4S6, Canada; ² Genome British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia V5Z 1C6, Canada; ³ Terry Fox Laboratory, BC Cancer Research Centre, BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia V5Z 1L3, Canada

We describe the details of a serial analysis of gene expression (SAGE) library construction and analysis platform that has enabled the generation of >298 high-quality SAGE libraries and >30 million SAGE tags primarily from sub-microgram amounts of total RNA purified from samples acquired by microdissection. Several RNA isolation methods were used to handle the diversity of samples processed, and various measures were applied to minimize ditag PCR carryover contamination. Modifications in the SAGE protocol resulted in improved cloning and DNA sequencing efficiencies. Bioinformatic measures to automatically assess DNA sequencing results were implemented to analyze the integrity of ditag structure, linker or cross-species ditag contamination, and yield of high-quality tags per sequence read. Our analysis of singleton tag errors resulted in a method for correcting such errors to statistically determine tag accuracy. From the libraries generated, we produced an essentially complete mapping of reliable 21-base-pair tags to the mouse reference genome sequence for a meta-library of 5 million tags. Our analyses led us to reject the commonly held notion that duplicate ditags are artifacts. Rather than the usual practice of discarding such tags, we conclude that they should be retained to avoid introducing bias into the results and thereby maintain the quantitative nature of the data, which is a major theoretical advantage of SAGE as a tool for global transcriptional profiling.

⁵ Corresponding author.

E-mail mmarra{at}bcgsc.ca; fax (604) 877-6085.

[Supplemental material is available online at www.genome.org.]

Article published online before print. Article and publication date are at http://www.genome.org/cgi/doi/10.1101/gr.5488207

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				E. D. Wederell, M. Bilenky, R. Cullum, N. Thiessen, M. Dagpinar, A. Delaney, R. Varhol, Y. Zhao, T. Zeng, B. Bernier, et al. Global analysis of in vivo Foxa2-binding sites in mouse adult liver using massively parallel sequencing Nucleic Acids Res., July 8, 2008; (2008) gkn382v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. R. Mercer, M. E. Dinger, S. M. Sunkin, M. F. Mehler, and J. S. Mattick Specific expression of long noncoding RNAs in the mouse brain PNAS, January 15, 2008; 105(2): 716 - 721. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. M. Sunkin and J. G. Hohmann Insights from spatially mapped gene expression in the mouse brain Hum. Mol. Genet., October 15, 2007; 16(R2): R209 - R219. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]