Genome Research scroll

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print June 7, 2006, 10.1101/gr.4708406
Genome Res. 16:934-946, 2006
©2006 by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; ISSN 1088-9051/06 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Research Data
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
gr.4708406v1
16/7/934    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Thomas, B. C.
Right arrow Articles by Freeling, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Thomas, B. C.
Right arrow Articles by Freeling, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Letter

Following tetraploidy in an Arabidopsis ancestor, genes were removed preferentially from one homeolog leaving clusters enriched in dose-sensitive genes

Brian C. Thomas1, Brent Pedersen2 and Michael Freeling3,4

1 College of Natural Resources, University of California–Berkeley, Berkeley, California 94720, USA; 2 Department of Environmental Science, Policy & Management, University of California–Berkeley, Berkeley, California 94720, USA; 3 Department of Plant & Microbial Biology, University of California–Berkeley, Berkeley, California 94720, USA

Approximately 90% of Arabidopsis’ unique gene content is found in syntenic blocks that were formed during the most recent whole-genome duplication. Within these blocks, 28.6% of the genes have a retained pair; the remaining genes have been lost from one of the homeologs. We create a minimized genome by condensing local duplications to one gene, removing transposons, and including only genes within blocks defined by retained pairs. We use a moving average of retained and non-retained genes to find clusters of retention and then identify the types of genes that appear in clusters at frequencies above expectations. Significant clusters of retention exist for almost all chromosomal segments. Detailed alignments show that, for 85% of the genome, one homeolog was preferentially (1.6x) targeted for fractionation. This homeolog fractionation bias suggests an epigenetic mechanism. We find that islands of retention contain "connected genes," those genes predicted—by the gene balance hypothesis—to be resistant to removal because the products they encode interact with other products in a dose-sensitive manner, creating a web of dependency. Gene families that are overrepresented in clusters include those encoding components of the proteasome/protein modification complexes, signal transduction machinery, ribosomes, and transcription factor complexes. Gene pair fractionation following polyploidy or segmental duplication leaves a genome enriched for "connected" genes. These clusters of duplicate genes may help explain the evolutionary origin of coregulated chromosomal regions and new functional modules.


4 Corresponding author.

E-mail freeling{at}nature.berkeley.edu; fax (510) 642-4995.

[Supplemental material is available online at www.genome.org.]

Article published online before print. Article and publication date are at http://www.genome.org/cgi/doi/10.1101/gr.4708406


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
Y. Wu, Z. Zhu, L. Ma, and M. Chen
The Preferential Retention of Starch Synthesis Genes Reveals the Impact of Whole-Genome Duplication on Grass Evolution
Mol. Biol. Evol., June 1, 2008; 25(6): 1003 - 1006.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
A. R. Leitch and I. J. Leitch
Genomic Plasticity and the Diversity of Polyploid Plants
Science, April 25, 2008; 320(5875): 481 - 483.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
M. J. A. van Hoek and P. Hogeweg
The Role of Mutational Dynamics in Genome Shrinkage
Mol. Biol. Evol., November 1, 2007; 24(11): 2485 - 2494.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant CellHome page
M. Freeling, L. Rapaka, E. Lyons, B. Pedersen, and B. C. Thomas
G-Boxes, Bigfoot Genes, and Environmental Response: Characterization of Intragenomic Conserved Noncoding Sequences in Arabidopsis
PLANT CELL, May 1, 2007; 19(5): 1441 - 1457.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
B. C. Thomas, L. Rapaka, E. Lyons, B. Pedersen, and M. Freeling
Arabidopsis intragenomic conserved noncoding sequence
PNAS, February 27, 2007; 104(9): 3348 - 3353.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant CellHome page
J. A. Birchler and R. A. Veitia
The Gene Balance Hypothesis: From Classical Genetics to Modern Genomics
PLANT CELL, February 1, 2007; 19(2): 395 - 402.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
J. A. Udall and J. F. Wendel
Polyploidy and Crop Improvement
Crop Sci., November 1, 2006; 46(Supplement_1): S-3 - S-14.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Genes Dev. Learn. Mem.
Protein Science RNA Genome Res.
Copyright © 2006 by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.