This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Supplemental Research Data All Versions of this Article: gr.5022906v1 16/7/875    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Halligan, D. L. Articles by Keightley, P. D. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Halligan, D. L. Articles by Keightley, P. D. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Letter

Ubiquitous selective constraints in the Drosophila genome revealed by a genome-wide interspecies comparison

Institute of Evolutionary Biology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH9 3JT, United Kingdom

Non-coding DNA comprises 80% of the euchromatic portion of the Drosophila melanogaster genome. Non-coding sequences are known to contain functionally important elements controlling gene expression, but the proportion of sites that are selectively constrained is still largely unknown. We have compared the complete D. melanogaster and Drosophila simulans genome sequences to estimate mean selective constraint (the fraction of mutations that are eliminated by selection) in coding and non-coding DNA by standardizing to substitution rates in putatively unconstrained sequences. We show that constraint is positively correlated with intronic and intergenic sequence length and is generally remarkably strong in non-coding DNA, implying that more than half of all point mutations in the Drosophila genome are deleterious. This fraction is also likely to be an underestimate if many substitutions in non-coding DNA are adaptively driven to fixation. We also show that substitutions in long introns and intergenic sequences are clustered, such that there is an excess of substitutions <8 bp apart and a deficit farther apart. These results suggest that there are blocks of constrained nucleotides, presumably involved in gene expression control, that are concentrated in long non-coding sequences. Furthermore, we infer that there is more than three times as much functional non-coding DNA as protein-coding DNA in the Drosophila genome. Most deleterious mutations therefore occur in non-coding DNA, and these may make an important contribution to a wide variety of evolutionary processes.

E-mail daniel.halligan{at}ed.ac.uk; fax 44-(0)131-650-6564.

[Supplemental material is available online at www.genome.org.]

Article published online before print. Article and publication date are at http://www.genome.org/cgi/doi/10.1101/gr.5022906

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. J. Emerson, M. Cardoso-Moreira, J. O. Borevitz, and M. Long Natural Selection Shapes Genome-Wide Patterns of Copy-Number Polymorphism in Drosophila melanogaster Science, June 20, 2008; 320(5883): 1629 - 1631. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Beisswanger and W. Stephan Evidence that strong positive selection drives neofunctionalization in the tandemly duplicated polyhomeotic genes in Drosophila PNAS, April 8, 2008; 105(14): 5447 - 5452. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Bachtrog Evidence for Male-Driven Evolution in Drosophila Mol. Biol. Evol., April 1, 2008; 25(4): 617 - 619. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				I. J. Tsai, D. Bensasson, A. Burt, and V. Koufopanou Population genomics of the wild yeast Saccharomyces paradoxus: Quantifying the life cycle PNAS, March 25, 2008; 105(12): 4957 - 4962. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. R. Scannell and K. H. Wolfe A burst of protein sequence evolution and a prolonged period of asymmetric evolution follow gene duplication in yeast Genome Res., January 1, 2008; 18(1): 137 - 147. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. Molina and E. van Nimwegen Universal patterns of purifying selection at noncoding positions in bacteria Genome Res., January 1, 2008; 18(1): 148 - 160. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. M. Macpherson, G. Sella, J. C. Davis, and D. A. Petrov Genomewide Spatial Correspondence Between Nonsynonymous Divergence and Neutral Polymorphism Reveals Extensive Adaptation in Drosophila Genetics, December 1, 2007; 177(4): 2083 - 2099. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. D. Keightley and A. Eyre-Walker Joint Inference of the Distribution of Fitness Effects of Deleterious Mutations and Population Demography Based on Nucleotide Polymorphism Frequencies Genetics, December 1, 2007; 177(4): 2251 - 2261. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Ashburner Drosophila Genomes by the Baker's Dozen Genetics, November 1, 2007; 177(3): 1263 - 1268. [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Casillas, A. Barbadilla, and C. M. Bergman Purifying Selection Maintains Highly Conserved Noncoding Sequences in Drosophila Mol. Biol. Evol., October 1, 2007; 24(10): 2222 - 2234. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. M. Bergman and D. Bensasson Recent LTR retrotransposon insertion contrasts with waves of non-LTR insertion since speciation in Drosophila melanogaster PNAS, July 3, 2007; 104(27): 11340 - 11345. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. K. Ingvarsson Gene Expression and Protein Length Influence Codon Usage and Rates of Sequence Evolution in Populus tremula Mol. Biol. Evol., March 1, 2007; 24(3): 836 - 844. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Bachtrog and P. Andolfatto Selection, Recombination and Demographic History in Drosophila miranda Genetics, December 1, 2006; 174(4): 2045 - 2059. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. C. Presgraves Intron Length Evolution in Drosophila Mol. Biol. Evol., November 1, 2006; 23(11): 2203 - 2213. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]