Genome Research scroll

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print June 12, 2006, 10.1101/gr.4717506
Genome Res. 16:855-863, 2006
©2006 by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; ISSN 1088-9051/06 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Research Data
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
gr.4717506v1
16/7/855    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Prabhakar, S.
Right arrow Articles by Pennacchio, L. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Prabhakar, S.
Right arrow Articles by Pennacchio, L. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Letter

Close sequence comparisons are sufficient to identify human cis-regulatory elements

Shyam Prabhakar1,2,4, Francis Poulin1,3, Malak Shoukry1, Veena Afzal1, Edward M. Rubin1,2, Olivier Couronne1,2 and Len A. Pennacchio1,2,4

1 Genomics Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94720, USA; 2 U.S. Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute, Walnut Creek, California 94598, USA

Cross-species DNA sequence comparison is the primary method used to identify functional noncoding elements in human and other large genomes. However, little is known about the relative merits of evolutionarily close and distant sequence comparisons. To address this problem, we identified evolutionarily conserved noncoding regions in primate, mammalian, and more distant comparisons using a uniform approach (Gumby) that facilitates unbiased assessment of the impact of evolutionary distance on predictive power. We benchmarked computational predictions against previously identified cis-regulatory elements at diverse genomic loci and also tested numerous extremely conserved human–rodent sequences for transcriptional enhancer activity using an in vivo enhancer assay in transgenic mice. Human regulatory elements were identified with acceptable sensitivity (53%–80%) and true-positive rate (27%–67%) by comparison with one to five other eutherian mammals or six other simian primates. More distant comparisons (marsupial, avian, amphibian, and fish) failed to identify many of the empirically defined functional noncoding elements. Our results highlight the practical utility of close sequence comparisons, and the loss of sensitivity entailed by more distant comparisons. We derived an intuitive relationship between ancient and recent noncoding sequence conservation from whole-genome comparative analysis that explains most of the observations from empirical benchmarking. Lastly, we determined that, in addition to strength of conservation, genomic location and/or density of surrounding conserved elements must also be considered in selecting candidate enhancers for in vivo testing at embryonic time points.


3 Present address: Department of Integrative Biology, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA.

4 Corresponding authors.

E-mail SPrabhakar{at}lbl.gov; fax (510) 486-4229. E-mail LAPennacchio{at}lbl.gov; fax (510) 486-4229.

[Supplemental material is available online at www.genome.org.]

Article published online before print. Article and publication date are at http://www.genome.org/cgi/doi/10.1101/gr.4717506


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Genome Res.Home page
D. M. McGaughey, R. M. Vinton, J. Huynh, A. Al-Saif, M. A. Beer, and A. S. McCallion
Metrics of sequence constraint overlook regulatory sequences in an exhaustive analysis at phox2b
Genome Res., February 1, 2008; 18(2): 252 - 260.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
W. T. Nottingham, A. Jarratt, M. Burgess, C. L. Speck, J.-F. Cheng, S. Prabhakar, E. M. Rubin, P.-S. Li, J. Sloane-Stanley, J. Kong-a-San, et al.
Runx1-mediated hematopoietic stem-cell emergence is controlled by a Gata/Ets/SCL-regulated enhancer
Blood, December 15, 2007; 110(13): 4188 - 4197.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
T. Wang, J. Zeng, C. B. Lowe, R. G. Sellers, S. R. Salama, M. Yang, S. M. Burgess, R. K. Brachmann, and D. Haussler
Species-specific endogenous retroviruses shape the transcriptional network of the human tumor suppressor protein p53
PNAS, November 20, 2007; 104(47): 18613 - 18618.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
T. Werner, A. Hammer, M. Wahlbuhl, M. R. Bosl, and M. Wegner
Multiple conserved regulatory elements with overlapping functions determine Sox10 expression in mouse embryogenesis
Nucleic Acids Res., October 8, 2007; 35(19): 6526 - 6538.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
K.-i. Inoue, K. Ito, M. Osato, B. Lee, S.-C. Bae, and Y. Ito
The Transcription Factor Runx3 Represses the Neurotrophin Receptor TrkB during Lineage Commitment of Dorsal Root Ganglion Neurons
J. Biol. Chem., August 17, 2007; 282(33): 24175 - 24184.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
A. Chabot, R. A. Shrit, R. Blekhman, and Y. Gilad
Using Reporter Gene Assays to Identify cis Regulatory Differences Between Humans and Chimpanzees
Genetics, August 1, 2007; 176(4): 2069 - 2076.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
M. Brudno, A. Poliakov, S. Minovitsky, I. Ratnere, and I. Dubchak
Multiple whole genome alignments and novel biomedical applications at the VISTA portal
Nucleic Acids Res., July 13, 2007; 35(suppl_2): W669 - W674.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Genome Res.Home page
C. M. Koch, R. M. Andrews, P. Flicek, S. C. Dillon, U. Karaoz, G. K. Clelland, S. Wilcox, D. M. Beare, J. C. Fowler, P. Couttet, et al.
The landscape of histone modifications across 1% of the human genome in five human cell lines
Genome Res., June 1, 2007; 17(6): 691 - 707.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
C. B. Lowe, G. Bejerano, and D. Haussler
Thousands of human mobile element fragments undergo strong purifying selection near developmental genes
PNAS, May 8, 2007; 104(19): 8005 - 8010.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Genome Res.Home page
L. A. Pennacchio, G. G. Loots, M. A. Nobrega, and I. Ovcharenko
Predicting tissue-specific enhancers in the human genome
Genome Res., February 1, 2007; 17(2): 201 - 211.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
A. Visel, S. Minovitsky, I. Dubchak, and L. A. Pennacchio
VISTA Enhancer Browser--a database of tissue-specific human enhancers
Nucleic Acids Res., January 12, 2007; 35(suppl_1): D88 - D92.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BioinformaticsHome page
G. Loots and I. Ovcharenko
ECRbase: database of evolutionary conserved regions, promoters, and transcription factor binding sites in vertebrate genomes
Bioinformatics, January 1, 2007; 23(1): 122 - 124.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Genes Dev. Learn. Mem.
Protein Science RNA Genome Res.
Copyright © 2006 by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.