Genome Research cityscape

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Genome Res. 16:559-566, 2006
©2006 by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; ISSN 1088-9051/06 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by West, M.
Right arrow Articles by Nevins, J. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by West, M.
Right arrow Articles by Nevins, J. R.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Breast Cancer
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Perspective

Embracing the complexity of genomic data for personalized medicine

Mike West1,5, Geoffrey S. Ginsburg1,3, Andrew T. Huang3,4 and Joseph R. Nevins1,2,6

1 Duke Institute for Genome Sciences & Policy, 2 Department of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology 3 Department of Medicine Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA; 4 Koo Foundation Sun Yat Sen Cancer Center Taipei, 112 Taiwan; 5 Institute of Statistics and Decision Sciences, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA

Numerous recent studies have demonstrated the use of genomic data, particularly gene expression signatures, as clinical prognostic factors in cancer and other complex diseases. Such studies herald the future of genomic medicine and the opportunity for personalized prognosis in a variety of clinical contexts that utilizes genome-scale molecular information. The scale, complexity, and information content of high-throughput gene expression data, as one example of complex genomic information, is often under-appreciated as many analyses continue to focus on defining individual rather than multiplex biomarkers for patient stratification. Indeed, this complexity of genomic data is often—rather paradoxically—viewed as a barrier to its utility. To the contrary, the complexity and scale of global genomic data, as representing the many dimensions of biology, must be embraced for the development of more precise clinical prognostics. The need is for integrated analyses—approaches that embrace the complexity of genomic data, including multiple forms of genomic data, and aim to explore and understand multiple, interacting, and potentially conflicting predictors of risk, rather than continuing on the current and traditional path that oversimplifies and ignores the information content in the complexity. All forms of potentially relevant data should be examined, with particular emphasis on understanding the interactions, complementarities, and possible conflicts among gene expression, genetic, and clinical markers of risk.


6 Corresponding author.

E-mail j.nevins{at}duke.edu; fax (919) 681-8973.

Article is online at http://www.genome.org/cgi/doi/10.1101/gr.3851306


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Brief BioinformHome page
D. J. Wilkinson
Bayesian methods in bioinformatics and computational systems biology
Brief Bioinform, April 12, 2007; (2007) bbm007v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Genes Dev. Learn. Mem.
Protein Science RNA Genome Res.
Copyright © 2006 by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.