Genome Research scroll

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print March 6, 2006, 10.1101/gr.4447906
Genome Res. 16:498-504, 2006
©2006 by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; ISSN 1088-9051/06 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
gr.4447906v1
16/4/498    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Thornton, K.
Right arrow Articles by Andolfatto, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Thornton, K.
Right arrow Articles by Andolfatto, P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Letter

X chromosomes and autosomes evolve at similar rates in Drosophila: No evidence for faster-X protein evolution

Kevin Thornton1,3, Doris Bachtrog2 and Peter Andolfatto2

1 Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853, USA; 2 Section of Ecology, Behavior and Evolution, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093, USA

Recent data from Drosophila suggest that a substantial fraction of amino acid substitutions observed between species are beneficial. If these beneficial mutations are on average partially recessive, then the rate of protein evolution is predicted to be faster for X-linked genes compared to autosomal genes (the "faster-X" hypothesis). We test this prediction by comparing rates of protein substitutions between orthologous genes, taking advantage of variations in chromosome fusions within the genus Drosophila. In members of the Drosophila melanogaster species group, the chromosomal arm 3L segregates as an ordinary autosome (i.e., two homologous copies in both males and females). However, in the Drosophila pseudoobscura species group, this chromosomal arm has become fused to the ancestral X chromosome and is hemizygous in males. The faster-X hypothesis predicts that protein evolution should be faster for genes on this chromosomal arm in the D. pseudoobscura lineage, relative to the D. melanogaster lineage. Here we combine new sequence data for 202 gene fragments in Drosophila miranda (in the pseudoobscura species group) with the completed genomes of D. melanogaster, D. pseudoobscura, and Drosophila yakuba to show that there are no detectable differences in rates of amino acid evolution for orthologous X-linked and autosomal genes. Our results imply that the contribution of the faster-X (if any) to the large-X effect on reproductive isolation in Drosophila is not due to a generally faster rate of protein evolution. The lack of a detectable faster-X effect in these species suggests either that beneficial amino acids are not partially recessive on average, or that adaptive evolution does not often use newly arising amino acid mutations.


3 Corresponding author.

E-mail kt234{at}cornell.edu; fax (607) 255-6249.

[The Drosophila three and four species alignments are available at http://www.molpopgen.org/krthornt/Data/ FastXGR. The sequence data from this study have been submitted to GenBank under accession nos. DQ334053– DQ33425.]

Article published online ahead of print. Article and publication date are at http://www.genome.org/cgi/doi/10.1101/gr.4447906


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
N. D. Singh, A. M. Larracuente, and A. G. Clark
Contrasting the Efficacy of Selection on the X and Autosomes in Drosophila
Mol. Biol. Evol., February 1, 2008; 25(2): 454 - 467.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
T. Connallon
Adaptive Protein Evolution of X-linked and Autosomal Genes in Drosophila: Implications for Faster-X Hypotheses
Mol. Biol. Evol., November 1, 2007; 24(11): 2566 - 2572.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Genome Res.Home page
J. E. Mank, E. Axelsson, and H. Ellegren
Fast-X on the Z: Rapid evolution of sex-linked genes in birds
Genome Res., May 1, 2007; 17(5): 618 - 624.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
J. F. Baines and B. Harr
Reduced X-Linked Diversity in Derived Populations of House Mice
Genetics, April 1, 2007; 175(4): 1911 - 1921.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Genes Dev. Learn. Mem.
Protein Science RNA Genome Res.
Copyright © 2006 by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.