This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Supplemental Research Data All Versions of this Article: gr.3895005v1 15/8/1086    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Gaffney, D. J. Articles by Keightley, P. D. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Gaffney, D. J. Articles by Keightley, P. D. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Letter

The scale of mutational variation in the murid genome

Institute of Evolutionary Biology, Ashworth Laboratories, School of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH9 3JT, United Kingdom

Mutation rates vary across mammalian genomes, but little is known about the scale over which this variation occurs. Knowledge of the magnitude and scale of mutational variation is required to understand the processes that drive mutation, and is essential in formulating a robust null hypothesis for comparative genomics studies. Here we estimate the scale of mutational variation in the murid genome by calculating the spatial autocorrelation of nucleotide substitution rates in ancestral repeats. Such transposable elements are good candidates for neutrally evolving sequence and therefore well suited for the study of mutation rate variation. We find that the autocorrelation coefficient decays to a value close to zero by 15 Mb, with little apparent variation in mutation rate under 100 kb. We conclude that the primary scale over which mutation rates vary is subchromosomal. Furthermore, our analysis shows that within-chromosome mutational variability exceeds variation among chromosomes by approximately one order of magnitude. Thus, differences in mutation rate between different regions of the same chromosome frequently exceed differences both between whole autosomes and between autosomes and the X-chromosome. Our results indicate that factors other than the time spent in the male germ line are important in driving mutation rates. This raises questions about the biological mechanism(s) that produce new mutations and has implications for the study of male-driven evolution.

Article and publication are at http://www.genome.org/cgi/doi/10.1101/gr.3895005. Article published online before print in July 2005.

¹ Corresponding author.
E-mail Daniel.Gaffney{at}ed.ac.uk; fax 44-131-6506564.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. E. Karro, M. Peifer, R. C. Hardison, M. Kollmann, and H. H. von Grunberg Exponential Decay of GC Content Detected by Strand-Symmetric Substitution Rates Influences the Evolution of Isochore Structure Mol. Biol. Evol., February 1, 2008; 25(2): 362 - 374. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y. D. Kelkar, S. Tyekucheva, F. Chiaromonte, and K. D. Makova The genome-wide determinants of human and chimpanzee microsatellite evolution Genome Res., January 1, 2008; 18(1): 30 - 38. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. R. Dreszer, G. D. Wall, D. Haussler, and K. S. Pollard Biased clustered substitutions in the human genome: The footprints of male-driven biased gene conversion Genome Res., October 1, 2007; 17(10): 1420 - 1430. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Asthana, W. S. Noble, G. Kryukov, C. E. Grant, S. Sunyaev, and J. A. Stamatoyannopoulos Widely distributed noncoding purifying selection in the human genome PNAS, July 24, 2007; 104(30): 12410 - 12415. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Brandstrom and H. Ellegren The Genomic Landscape of Short Insertion and Deletion Polymorphisms in the Chicken (Gallus gallus) Genome: A High Frequency of Deletions in Tandem Duplicates Genetics, July 1, 2007; 176(3): 1691 - 1701. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Ponjavic, C. P. Ponting, and G. Lunter Functionality or transcriptional noise? Evidence for selection within long noncoding RNAs Genome Res., May 1, 2007; 17(5): 556 - 565. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. P. Ponting and G. Lunter Signatures of adaptive evolution within human non-coding sequence Hum. Mol. Genet., October 15, 2006; 15(suppl_2): R170 - R175. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y. Xing, Q. Wang, and C. Lee Evolutionary Divergence of Exon Flanks: A Dissection of Mutability and Selection Genetics, July 1, 2006; 173(3): 1787 - 1791. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. W. Hahn Accurate Inference and Estimation in Population Genomics Mol. Biol. Evol., May 1, 2006; 23(5): 911 - 918. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]