Genome Research cityscape

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Genome Res. 15:577-582, 2005
©2005 by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; ISSN 1088-9051/05 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Research Data
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wei, C.
Right arrow Articles by Brent, M. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wei, C.
Right arrow Articles by Brent, M. R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Resources

Closing in on the C. elegans ORFeome by cloning TWINSCAN predictions

Chaochun Wei1, Philippe Lamesch2, Manimozhiyan Arumugam1, Jennifer Rosenberg2, Ping Hu1, Marc Vidal2 and Michael R. Brent1,3

1 Laboratory for Computational Genomics and Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri 63130, USA 2 Center for Cancer Systems Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, and Department of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA

The genome of Caenorhabditis elegans was the first animal genome to be sequenced. Although considerable effort has been devoted to annotating it, the standard WormBase annotation contains thousands of predicted genes for which there is no cDNA or EST evidence. We hypothesized that a more complete experimental annotation could be obtained by creating a more accurate gene-prediction program and then amplifying and sequencing predicted genes. Our approach was to adapt the TWINSCAN gene prediction system to C. elegans and C. briggsae and to improve its splice site and intron-length models. The resulting system has 60% sensitivity and 58% specificity in exact prediction of open reading frames (ORFs), and hence, proteins–the best results we are aware of any multicellular organism. We then attempted to amplify, clone, and sequence 265 TWINSCAN-predicted ORFs that did not overlap WormBase gene annotations. The success rate was 55%, adding 146 genes that were completely absent from WormBase to the ORF clone collection (ORFeome). The same procedure had a 7% success rate on 90 Worm Base "predicted" genes that do not overlap TWINSCAN predictions. These results indicate that the accuracy of WormBase could be significantly increased by replacing its partially curated predicted genes with TWINSCAN predictions. The technology described in this study will continue to drive the C. elegans ORFeome toward completion and contribute to the annotation of the three Caenorhabditis species currently being sequenced. The results also suggest that this technology can significantly improve our knowledge of the "parts list" for even the best-studied model organisms.


Article and publication are at http://www.genome.org/cgi/doi/10.1101/gr.3329005.

3 Corresponding author.
E-mail brent{at}cse.wustl.edu; fax (314) 935-7302.

[Supplemental material is available online at www.genome.org.]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Genome Res.Home page
Q. M. Mitrovich, B. B. Tuch, C. Guthrie, and A. D. Johnson
Computational and experimental approaches double the number of known introns in the pathogenic yeast Candida albicans
Genome Res., April 1, 2007; 17(4): 492 - 502.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
E. M. Schwarz, I. Antoshechkin, C. Bastiani, T. Bieri, D. Blasiar, P. Canaran, J. Chan, N. Chen, W. J. Chen, P. Davis, et al.
WormBase: better software, richer content
Nucleic Acids Res., January 1, 2006; 34(suppl_1): D475 - D478.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Genome Res.Home page
L. W. Hillier, A. Coulson, J. I. Murray, Z. Bao, J. E. Sulston, and R. H. Waterston
Genomics in C. elegans: So many genes, such a little worm
Genome Res., December 1, 2005; 15(12): 1651 - 1660.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Genome Res.Home page
M. R. Brent
Genome annotation past, present, and future: How to define an ORF at each locus
Genome Res., December 1, 2005; 15(12): 1777 - 1786.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Mol GenetHome page
M. E. Cusick, N. Klitgord, M. Vidal, and D. E. Hill
Interactome: gateway into systems biology
Hum. Mol. Genet., October 15, 2005; 14(suppl_2): R171 - R181.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
M. Hiller, K. Huse, M. Platzer, and R. Backofen
Non-EST based prediction of exon skipping and intron retention events using Pfam information
Nucleic Acids Res., October 4, 2005; 33(17): 5611 - 5621.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Genes Dev. Learn. Mem.
Protein Science RNA Genome Res.
Copyright © 2005 by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.