Genome Research CSH PROT

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Genome Res. 15:214-223, 2005
©2005 by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; ISSN 1088-9051/05 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Research Data
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bagnall, R. D.
Right arrow Articles by Giannelli, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bagnall, R. D.
Right arrow Articles by Giannelli, F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Letter

Gene conversion and evolution of Xq28 duplicons involved in recurring inversions causing severe hemophilia A

Richard D. Bagnall1, Karen L. Ayres2, Peter M. Green1 and Francesco Giannelli1,3

1 Department of Medical and Molecular Genetics, Guy's, King's College and St. Thomas' Hospitals Medical College, King's College, London SE1 9RT, United Kingdom 2 School of Applied Statistics, University of Reading, Reading RG6 6FN, United Kingdom

Inversions breaking the 1041 bp int1h-1 or the 9.5-kb int22h-1 sequence of the F8 gene cause hemophilia A in 1/30,000 males. These inversions are due to homologous recombination between the above sequences and their inverted copies on the same DNA molecule, respectively, int1h-2 and int22h-2 or int22h-3. We find that (1) int1h and int22h duplicated more than 25 million years ago; (2) the identity of the copies (>99%) of these sequences in humans and other primates is due to gene conversion; (3) gene conversion is most frequent in the internal regions of int22h; (4) breakpoints of int22h-related inversions also tend to involve the internal regions of int22h; (5) sequence variations in a sample of human X chromosomes defined eight haplotypes of int22h-1 and 27 of int22h-2 plus int22h-3; (6) the latter two sequences, which lie, respectively, 500 and 600 kb telomeric to int22h-1 are five-fold more identical when in cis than when in trans, thus suggesting that gene conversion may be predominantly intrachromosomal; (7) int1h, int22h, and flanking sequences evolved at a rate of about 0.1% substitutions per million years during the divergence between humans and other primates, except for int1h during the human-chimpanzee divergence, when its rate of evolution was significantly lower. This is reminiscent of the slower evolution of palindrome arms in the male specific regions of the Y chromosome and we propose, as an explanation, that intrachromosomal gene conversion and cosegregation of the duplicated regions favors retention of the ancestral sequence and thus reduces the evolution rate.


3 Corresponding author.
E-mail francesco.giannelli{at}genetics.kcl.ac.uk; fax 02071882585.

[Supplemental material is available online at www.genome.org. The sequence data from this study have been submitted to GenBank under accession nos. AY619998-AY620001 and AY781298-AY781308.]

Article and publication are at http://www.genome.org/cgi/doi/10.1101/gr.2946205.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Genome Res.Home page
M. Bauters, H. Van Esch, M. J. Friez, O. Boespflug-Tanguy, M. Zenker, A. M. Vianna-Morgante, C. Rosenberg, J. Ignatius, M. Raynaud, K. Hollanders, et al.
Nonrecurrent MECP2 duplications mediated by genomic architecture-driven DNA breaks and break-induced replication repair
Genome Res., June 1, 2008; 18(6): 847 - 858.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
M. Caceres, National Institutes of Health Intramural Sequencin, R. T. Sullivan, and J. W. Thomas
A recurrent inversion on the eutherian X chromosome
PNAS, November 20, 2007; 104(47): 18571 - 18576.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Trop Med HygHome page
C. FELU, J. PASTURE, E. PAYS, and D. PEREZ-MORGA
DIAGNOSTIC POTENTIAL OF A CONSERVED GENOMIC REARRANGEMENT IN THE TRYPANOSOMA BRUCEI GAMBIENSE-SPECIFIC TGSGP LOCUS
Am J Trop Med Hyg, May 1, 2007; 76(5): 922 - 929.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
K. Ezawa, S. OOta, and N. Saitou
Genome-Wide Search of Gene Conversions in Duplicated Genes of Mouse and Rat
Mol. Biol. Evol., May 1, 2006; 23(5): 927 - 940.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Genes Dev. Learn. Mem.
Protein Science RNA Genome Res.
Copyright © 2005 by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.