This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Keightley, P. D. Articles by Gaffney, D. J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Keightley, P. D. Articles by Gaffney, D. J. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Letter

Evolutionary constraints in conserved nongenic sequences of mammals

¹ Institute of Evolutionary Biology, School of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH9 3JT, United Kingdom ² Division of Genetics, Department of Medicine, Brigham & Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA

Mammalian genomes contain many highly conserved nongenic sequences (CNGs) whose functional significance is poorly understood. Sets of CNGs have previously been identified by selecting the most conserved elements from a chromosome or genome, but in these highly selected samples, conservation may be unrelated to purifying selection. Furthermore, conservation of CNGs may be caused by mutation rate variation rather than selective constraints. To account for the effect of selective sampling, we have examined conservation of CNGs in taxa whose evolution is largely independent of the taxa from which the CNGs were initially identified, and we have controlled for mutation rate variation in the genome. We show that selective constraints in CNGs and their flanks are about one-half as strong in hominids as in murids, implying that hominids have accumulated many slightly deleterious mutations in functionally important nongenic regions. This is likely to be a consequence of the low effective population size of hominids leading to a reduced effectiveness of selection. We estimate that there are one and two times as many conserved nucleotides in CNGs as in known protein-coding genes of hominids and murids, respectively. Polymorphism frequencies in CNGs indicate that purifying selection operates in these sequences. During hominid evolution, we estimate that a total of about three deleterious mutations in CNGs and protein-coding genes have been selectively eliminated per diploid genome each generation, implying that deleterious mutations are eliminated from populations non-independently and that sex is necessary for long-term population persistence.

Article and publication are at http://www.genome.org/cgi/doi/10.1101/gr.3942005.

³ Corresponding author.
E-mail keightley.gr2005{at}spambob.net; fax 44 (0) 131 650 6564.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				H. Liang, Y.-S. Lin, and W.-H. Li Fast Evolution of Core Promoters in Primate Genomes Mol. Biol. Evol., June 1, 2008; 25(6): 1239 - 1244. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. I. Nikolaev, J. I. Montoya-Burgos, K. Popadin, L. Parand, E. H. Margulies, National Institutes of Health Intramural Sequencin, and S. E. Antonarakis Life-history traits drive the evolutionary rates of mammalian coding and noncoding genomic elements PNAS, December 18, 2007; 104(51): 20443 - 20448. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Charlesworth and A. Eyre-Walker The other side of the nearly neutral theory, evidence of slightly advantageous back-mutations PNAS, October 23, 2007; 104(43): 16992 - 16997. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Casillas, A. Barbadilla, and C. M. Bergman Purifying Selection Maintains Highly Conserved Noncoding Sequences in Drosophila Mol. Biol. Evol., October 1, 2007; 24(10): 2222 - 2234. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Knibbe, A. Coulon, O. Mazet, J.-M. Fayard, and G. Beslon A Long-Term Evolutionary Pressure on the Amount of Noncoding DNA Mol. Biol. Evol., October 1, 2007; 24(10): 2344 - 2353. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Asthana, W. S. Noble, G. Kryukov, C. E. Grant, S. Sunyaev, and J. A. Stamatoyannopoulos Widely distributed noncoding purifying selection in the human genome PNAS, July 24, 2007; 104(30): 12410 - 12415. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. L. Stone, B. Merriman, R. M. Cantor, D. H. Geschwind, and S. F. Nelson High density SNP association study of a major autism linkage region on chromosome 17 Hum. Mol. Genet., March 15, 2007; 16(6): 704 - 715. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. A. Bernat, G. E. Crawford, A. Y. Ogurtsov, F. S. Collins, D. Ginsburg, and A. S. Kondrashov Distant conserved sequences flanking endothelial-specific promoters contain tissue-specific DNase-hypersensitive sites and over-represented motifs Hum. Mol. Genet., July 1, 2006; 15(13): 2098 - 2105. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				X. She, G. Liu, M. Ventura, S. Zhao, D. Misceo, R. Roberto, M. F. Cardone, M. Rocchi, NISC Comparative Sequencing Program, E. D. Green, et al. A preliminary comparative analysis of primate segmental duplications shows elevated substitution rates and a great-ape expansion of intrachromosomal duplications Genome Res., May 1, 2006; 16(5): 576 - 583. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]