Genome Research scroll

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print December 8, 2004, 10.1101/gr.2438004
Genome Res. 15:126-136, 2005
©2005 by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; ISSN 1088-9051/05 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Research Data
Right arrow The Chicken Genome
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
gr.2438004v1
gr.2438004v2
15/1/126    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wicker, T.
Right arrow Articles by Ivarie, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wicker, T.
Right arrow Articles by Ivarie, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Chicken Special/Letter

The repetitive landscape of the chicken genome

Thomas Wicker1,5, Jon S. Robertson1,5, Stefan R. Schulze1, F. Alex Feltus1, Vincent Magrini3, Jason A. Morrison3, Elaine R. Mardis3, Richard K. Wilson3, Daniel G. Peterson1,4, Andrew H. Paterson1,2,6 and Robert Ivarie2,6

1 Plant Genome Mapping Laboratory, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia 30602, USA 2 Department of Genetics, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia 30602, USA 3 Genome Sequencing Center, Washington University Medical Center, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri 63108, USA 4 Mississippi Genome Exploration Laboratory, Mississippi State University, Starkville, Mississippi 39762, USA

Cot-based cloning and sequencing (CBCS) is a powerful tool for isolating and characterizing the various repetitive components of any genome, combining the established principles of DNA reassociation kinetics with high-throughput sequencing. CBCS was used to generate sequence libraries representing the high, middle, and low-copy fractions of the chicken genome. Sequencing high-copy DNA of chicken to about 2.7x coverage of its estimated sequence complexity led to the initial identification of several new repeat families, which were then used for a survey of the newly released first draft of the complete chicken genome. The analysis provided insight into the diversity and biology of known repeat structures such as CR1 and CNM, for which only limited sequence data had previously been available. Cot sequence data also resulted in the identification of four novel repeats (Birddawg, Hitchcock, Kronos, and Soprano), two new subfamilies of CR1 repeats, and many elements absent from the chicken genome assembly. Multiple autonomous elements were found for a novel Mariner-like transposon, Galluhop, in addition to nonautonomous deletion derivatives. Phylogenetic analysis of the high-copy repeats CR1, Galluhop, and Birddawg provided insight into two distinct genome dispersion strategies. This study also exemplifies the power of the CBCS method to create representative databases for the repetitive fractions of genomes for which only limited sequence data is available.


Article and publication are at http://www.genome.org/cgi/doi/10.1101/gr.2438005. Article published online before print in July 2004.

5 These two authors contributed equally to this work.

6 Corresponding authors.
E-mail ivarie{at}uga.edu; fax (706) 542-3910.
E-mail paterson{at}uga.edu; fax (706) 583-0160.

[Supplemental material is available online at www.genome.org and http://plantgenome.agtec.uga.edu/g4g. The sequence data described in this study have been submitted to GenBank under accession nos. CL266240–CL281342. Consensus sequences for the novel repeat families and their major subfamilies were submitted to RepBase.]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
K. Ichiyanagi and N. Okada
Mobility Pathways for Vertebrate L1, L2, CR1, and RTE Clade Retrotransposons
Mol. Biol. Evol., June 1, 2008; 25(6): 1148 - 1157.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
S. Saha, S. Bridges, Z. V. Magbanua, and D. G. Peterson
Empirical comparison of ab initio repeat finding programs
Nucleic Acids Res., April 1, 2008; 36(7): 2284 - 2294.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
G. Abrusan, H.-J. Krambeck, T. Junier, J. Giordano, and P. E. Warburton
Biased Distributions and Decay of Long Interspersed Nuclear Elements in the Chicken Genome
Genetics, January 1, 2008; 178(1): 573 - 581.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Genome Res.Home page
T. Wicker and B. Keller
Genome-wide comparative analysis of copia retrotransposons in Triticeae, rice, and Arabidopsis reveals conserved ancient evolutionary lineages and distinct dynamics of individual copia families
Genome Res., July 1, 2007; 17(7): 1072 - 1081.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
V. B. Kaiser, M. van Tuinen, and H. Ellegren
Insertion Events of CR1 Retrotransposable Elements Elucidate the Phylogenetic Branching Order in Galliform Birds
Mol. Biol. Evol., January 1, 2007; 24(1): 338 - 347.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Poult. Sci.Home page
P. B. Siegel, J. B. Dodgson, and L. Andersson
Progress from Chicken Genetics to the Chicken Genome
Poult. Sci., December 1, 2006; 85(12): 2050 - 2060.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
S. J. Wheelan, L. Z. Scheifele, F. Martinez-Murillo, R. A. Irizarry, and J. D. Boeke
Eukaryotic Transposable Elements and Genome Evolution Special Feature: Transposon insertion site profiling chip (TIP-chip)
PNAS, November 21, 2006; 103(47): 17632 - 17637.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J HeredHome page
Z. Wang, T. Miyake, S. V. Edwards, and C. T. Amemiya
Tuatara (Sphenodon) Genomics: BAC Library Construction, Sequence Survey, and Application to the DMRT Gene Family
J. Hered., November 1, 2006; 97(6): 541 - 548.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
M. T. Webster, E. Axelsson, and H. Ellegren
Strong Regional Biases in Nucleotide Substitution in the Chicken Genome
Mol. Biol. Evol., June 1, 2006; 23(6): 1203 - 1216.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
D. A. Moon, S. M. Veniamin, J. A. Parks-Dely, and K. E. Magor
The MHC of the Duck (Anas platyrhynchos) Contains Five Differentially Expressed Class I Genes
J. Immunol., November 15, 2005; 175(10): 6702 - 6712.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Genes Dev. Learn. Mem.
Protein Science RNA Genome Res.
Copyright © 2005 by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.