Genome Research cityscape

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print December 8, 2004, 10.1101/gr.3108805
Genome Res. 15:111-119, 2005
©2005 by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; ISSN 1088-9051/05 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Research Data
Right arrow The Chicken Genome
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
gr.3108805v1
15/1/111    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Abril, J. F.
Right arrow Articles by Guigó, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Abril, J. F.
Right arrow Articles by Guigó, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Chicken Special/Letter

Comparison of splice sites in mammals and chicken

Josep F. Abril, Robert Castelo and Roderic Guigó1

Grup de Recerca en Informàtica Biomèdica, Institut Municipal d'Investigació Mèdica, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, and Programa de Bioinformàtica i Genòmica, Centre de Regulació Genòmica, C/ Dr. Aiguader 80, E-08003 Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain

We have carried out an initial analysis of the dynamics of the recent evolution of the splice-sites sequences on a large collection of human, rodent (mouse and rat), and chicken introns. Our results indicate that the sequences of splice sites are largely homogeneous within tetrapoda. We have also found that orthologous splice signals between human and rodents and within rodents are more conserved than unrelated splice sites, but the additional conservation can be explained mostly by background intron conservation. In contrast, additional conservation over background is detectable in orthologous mammalian and chicken splice sites. Our results also indicate that the U2 and U12 intron classes seem to have evolved independently since the split of mammals and birds; we have not been able to find a convincing case of interconversion between these two classes in our collections of orthologous introns. Similarly, we have not found a single case of switching between AT-AC and GT-AG subtypes within U12 introns, suggesting that this event has been a rare occurrence in recent evolutionary times. Switching between GT-AG and the noncanonical GC-AG U2 subtypes, on the contrary, does not appear to be unusual; in particular, T to C mutations appear to be relatively well tolerated in GT-AG introns with very strong donor sites.


Article and publication are at http://www.genome.org/cgi/doi/10.1101/gr.3108805. Article published online before print in December 2004.

1 Corresponding author.
E-mail rguigo{at}imim.es; fax 34-93-221-32-37.

[Supplemental material is available online at www.genome.org. The following individuals kindly provided reagents, samples, or unpublished information as indicated in the paper: P. Bork and I. Letunic.]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RNAHome page
M. Hiller, K. Szafranski, R. Sinha, K. Huse, S. Nikolajewa, P. Rosenstiel, S. Schreiber, R. Backofen, and M. Platzer
Assessing the fraction of short-distance tandem splice sites under purifying selection
RNA, April 1, 2008; 14(4): 616 - 629.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Genome Res.Home page
S. Schwartz, J. Silva, D. Burstein, T. Pupko, E. Eyras, and G. Ast
Large-scale comparative analysis of splicing signals and their corresponding splicing factors in eukaryotes
Genome Res., January 1, 2008; 18(1): 88 - 103.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Genome Res.Home page
K. Garg and P. Green
Differing patterns of selection in alternative and constitutive splice sites
Genome Res., July 1, 2007; 17(7): 1015 - 1022.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Poult. Sci.Home page
P. B. Siegel, J. B. Dodgson, and L. Andersson
Progress from Chicken Genetics to the Chicken Genome
Poult. Sci., December 1, 2006; 85(12): 2050 - 2060.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RNAHome page
H. K.J. Pessa, A. Ruokolainen, and M. J. Frilander
The abundance of the spliceosomal snRNPs is not limiting the splicing of U12-type introns
RNA, October 1, 2006; 12(10): 1883 - 1892.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
N. Sheth, X. Roca, M. L. Hastings, T. Roeder, A. R. Krainer, and R. Sachidanandam
Comprehensive splice-site analysis using comparative genomics
Nucleic Acids Res., September 1, 2006; 34(14): 3955 - 3967.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
G. Veit, B. Kobbe, D. R. Keene, M. Paulsson, M. Koch, and R. Wagener
Collagen XXVIII, a Novel von Willebrand Factor A Domain-containing Protein with Many Imperfections in the Collagenous Domain
J. Biol. Chem., February 10, 2006; 281(6): 3494 - 3504.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Genes Dev. Learn. Mem.
Protein Science RNA Genome Res.
Copyright © 2005 by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.