Genome Research cityscape

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Genome Res. 14:591-602, 2004
©2004 by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; ISSN 1088-9051/04 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Research Data
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Emes, R. D.
Right arrow Articles by Goodstadt, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Emes, R. D.
Right arrow Articles by Goodstadt, L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Letter

Evolution and Comparative Genomics of Odorant- and Pheromone-Associated Genes in Rodents

Richard D. Emes1, Scott A. Beatson1,2, Chris P. Ponting3 and Leo Goodstadt

MRC Functional Genetics Unit, Department of Human Anatomy and Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3QX, UK

Chemical cues influence a range of behavioral responses in rodents. The involvement of protein odorants and odorant receptors in mediating reproductive behavior, foraging, and predator avoidance suggests that their genes may have been subject to adaptive evolution. We have estimated the consequences of selection on rodent pheromones, their receptors, and olfactory receptors. These families were chosen on the basis of multiple gene duplications since the common ancestor of rat and mouse. For each family, codons were identified that are likely to have been subject to adaptive evolution. The majority of such sites are situated on the solvent-accessible surfaces of putative pheromones and the lumenal portions of their likely receptors. We predict that these contribute to physicochemical and functional diversity within pheromone-receptor interaction sites.


Article and publication are at http://www.genome.org/cgi/doi/10.1101/gr.1940604.

1 These authors contributed equally to this work.

2 Present address: Division of Immunity & Infection, University of Birmingham. Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.

3 Corresponding author.
E-MAIL Chris.Ponting{at}anat.ox.ac.uk; FAX 44 (0)1865 272420.

[Supplemental material is available online at www.genome.org.]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Chem SensesHome page
L. D. Houck, R. A. Watts, S. J. Arnold, K. E. Bowen, K. M. Kiemnec, H. A. Godwin, P. W. Feldhoff, and R. C. Feldhoff
A Recombinant Courtship Pheromone Affects Sexual Receptivity in a Plethodontid Salamander
Chem Senses, June 5, 2008; (2008) bjn027v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Genome Res.Home page
A. Heger and C. P. Ponting
Evolutionary rate analyses of orthologs and paralogs from 12 Drosophila genomes
Genome Res., December 1, 2007; 17(12): 1837 - 1849.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
W. E. Grus, P. Shi, and J. Zhang
Largest Vertebrate Vomeronasal Type 1 Receptor Gene Repertoire in the Semiaquatic Platypus
Mol. Biol. Evol., October 1, 2007; 24(10): 2153 - 2157.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
S. Guo and J. Kim
Molecular Evolution of Drosophila Odorant Receptor Genes
Mol. Biol. Evol., May 1, 2007; 24(5): 1198 - 1207.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
A. Sanchez-Gracia and J. Rozas
Unusual Pattern of Nucleotide Sequence Variation at the OS-E and OS-F Genomic Regions of Drosophila simulans
Genetics, April 1, 2007; 175(4): 1923 - 1935.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Genome Res.Home page
P. Shi and J. Zhang
Comparative genomic analysis identifies an evolutionary shift of vomeronasal receptor gene repertoires in the vertebrate transition from water to land
Genome Res., February 1, 2007; 17(2): 166 - 174.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
M. M. Hoffman and E. Birney
Estimating the Neutral Rate of Nucleotide Substitution Using Introns
Mol. Biol. Evol., February 1, 2007; 24(2): 522 - 531.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
P. Shi and J. Zhang
Contrasting Modes of Evolution Between Vertebrate Sweet/Umami Receptor Genes and Bitter Receptor Genes
Mol. Biol. Evol., February 1, 2006; 23(2): 292 - 300.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
C. A. Palmer, R. A. Watts, R. G. Gregg, M. A. McCall, L. D. Houck, R. Highton, and S. J. Arnold
Lineage-Specific Differences in Evolutionary Mode in a Salamander Courtship Pheromone
Mol. Biol. Evol., November 1, 2005; 22(11): 2243 - 2256.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
I. Rodriguez
Remarkable diversity of mammalian pheromone receptor repertoires
PNAS, May 10, 2005; 102(19): 6639 - 6640.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
Q. Wu
Comparative Genomics and Diversifying Selection of the Clustered Vertebrate Protocadherin Genes
Genetics, April 1, 2005; 169(4): 2179 - 2188.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Genome Res.Home page
R. D. Emes, M. C. Riley, C. M. Laukaitis, L. Goodstadt, R. C. Karn, and C. P. Ponting
Comparative Evolutionary Genomics of Androgen-Binding Protein Genes
Genome Res., August 1, 2004; 14(8): 1516 - 1529.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Genes Dev. Learn. Mem.
Protein Science RNA Genome Res.
Copyright © 2004 by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.