Genome Research cityscape

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Genome Res. 14:555-566, 2004
©2004 by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; ISSN 1088-9051/04 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Research Data
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, M. S.
Right arrow Articles by Copley, R. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, M. S.
Right arrow Articles by Copley, R. R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Letter

Occurrence and Consequences of Coding Sequence Insertions and Deletions in Mammalian Genomes

Martin S. Taylor1,3, Chris P. Ponting2 and Richard R. Copley1

1 Wellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 7BN, UK 2 MRC Functional Genetics Unit, Department of Human Anatomy and Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX1 3QX, UK

Nucleotide insertion and deletion (indel) events, together with substitutions, represent the major mutational processes of gene evolution. Through the alignment of 8148 orthologous genes from human, mouse, and rat, we have identified 1743 indel events within rodent protein-coding sequences. Using human as an out-group, we reconstructed the mutational event underlying each of these indels. Overall, we found an excess of deletions over insertions, particularly for the rat lineage (70% excess). Sequence slippage accounts for at least 52% of insertions and 38% of deletions. We have also evaluated the selective tolerance of identifiable protein structures to indels. Transmembrane domains are the least, and low complexity regions, the most tolerant. Mapping of indels onto known protein structures demonstrated that structural cores are markedly less tolerant to indels than are loop regions. There is a specific enrichment of CpG dinucleotides in close proximity to insertion events, and both insertions and deletions are more common in higher G+C content sequences.


Article and publication are at http://www.genome.org/cgi/doi/10.1101/gr.1977804.

3 Corresponding author.
E-MAIL martin.taylor{at}well.ox.ac.uk; FAX 44-01865-287501.

[Supplemental material is available online at www.genome.org. The following individuals kindly provided reagents, samples, or unpublished information as indicated in the paper: L. Goodstadt, A. Ureta-Vidal, G. Cooper, and the Rat Genome Sequencing Project.]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Protein Eng Des SelHome page
S. Emond, P. Mondon, S. Pizzut-Serin, L. Douchy, F. Crozet, K. Bouayadi, H. Kharrat, G. Potocki-Veronese, P. Monsan, and M. Remaud-Simeon
A novel random mutagenesis approach using human mutagenic DNA polymerases to generate enzyme variant libraries
Protein Eng. Des. Sel., April 1, 2008; 21(4): 267 - 274.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
M. Brandstrom and H. Ellegren
The Genomic Landscape of Short Insertion and Deletion Polymorphisms in the Chicken (Gallus gallus) Genome: A High Frequency of Deletions in Tandem Duplicates
Genetics, July 1, 2007; 176(3): 1691 - 1701.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
Y. Q. Gu, J. Salse, D. Coleman-Derr, A. Dupin, C. Crossman, G. R. Lazo, N. Huo, H. Belcram, C. Ravel, G. Charmet, et al.
Types and Rates of Sequence Evolution at the High-Molecular-Weight Glutenin Locus in Hexaploid Wheat and Its Ancestral Genomes
Genetics, November 1, 2006; 174(3): 1493 - 1504.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
J. Gressel and A. A. Levy
Agriculture: The selector of improbable mutations
PNAS, August 15, 2006; 103(33): 12215 - 12216.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Genome Res.Home page
C. Webber and C. P. Ponting
Hotspots of mutation and breakage in dog and human chromosomes
Genome Res., December 1, 2005; 15(12): 1787 - 1797.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J HeredHome page
T. Hosoda, J. J. Sato, T. Shimada, K. L. Campbell, and H. Suzuki
Independent Nonframeshift Deletions in the MC1R Gene Are Not Associated with Melanistic Coat Coloration in Three Mustelid Lineages
J. Hered., September 1, 2005; 96(5): 607 - 613.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
D. D. Jones
Triplet nucleotide removal at random positions in a target gene: the tolerance of TEM-1 {beta}-lactamase to an amino acid deletion
Nucleic Acids Res., May 16, 2005; 33(9): e80 - e80.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Mol GenetHome page
J. Amiel, D. Trochet, M. Clement-Ziza, A. Munnich, and S. Lyonnet
Polyalanine expansions in human
Hum. Mol. Genet., October 1, 2004; 13(suppl_2): R235 - R243.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Genes Dev. Learn. Mem.
Protein Science RNA Genome Res.
Copyright © 2004 by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.