This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Supplemental Research Data All Versions of this Article: 1961204v1 14/3/367    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Frazer, K. A. Articles by Cox, D. R. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Frazer, K. A. Articles by Cox, D. R. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Letter

Noncoding Sequences Conserved in a Limited Number of Mammals in the SIM2 Interval are Frequently Functional

¹ Perlegen Sciences, Mountain View, California 95051, USA ² Children's Hospital and Research Center at Oakland, Oakland, California 94609, USA

Cross-species DNA sequence comparison is a fundamental method for identifying biologically important elements, because functional sequences are evolutionarily conserved, wheres nonfunctional sequences drift. A recent genome-wide comparison of human and mouse DNA discovered over 200,000 conserved noncoding sequences with unknown function. Multispecies DNA comparison has been proposed as a method to prioritize these conserved noncoding sequences for functional analysis based on the hypothesis that elements present in many species are more likely to be functional than elements present in limited numbers of species. Here, we perform a comparative analysis of the single-minded 2 (SIM2) gene interval on human chromosome 21 with horse, cow, pig, dog, cat, and mouse DNA. We classify conserved sequences based on the number of mammals in which they are present, and experimentally test sequences in each class for function. As hypothesized, conserved sequences present in many mammals are frequently functional. Additionally, we demonstrate that sequences conserved in a limited number of mammals are also frequently functional. Examination of genomic deletions in chimpanzee and rhesus macaque DNA showed that several putatively functional conserved noncoding human sequences were absent in these primates. These findings suggest that functional conserved noncoding human sequences can be missing in other mammals, even closely related primate species.

³ Corresponding author.
E-MAIL Kelly_frazer{at}perlegen.com;FAX (650) 625-4510.

[Supplemental material is available online at www.genome.org.]

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. I. Nikolaev, J. I. Montoya-Burgos, K. Popadin, L. Parand, E. H. Margulies, National Institutes of Health Intramural Sequencin, and S. E. Antonarakis Life-history traits drive the evolutionary rates of mammalian coding and noncoding genomic elements PNAS, December 18, 2007; 104(51): 20443 - 20448. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Pheasant and J. S. Mattick Raising the estimate of functional human sequences Genome Res., September 1, 2007; 17(9): 1245 - 1253. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. A. Pennacchio, G. G. Loots, M. A. Nobrega, and I. Ovcharenko Predicting tissue-specific enhancers in the human genome Genome Res., February 1, 2007; 17(2): 201 - 211. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Wang, Y. Zhang, Y. Cheng, Y. Zhou, D. C. King, J. Taylor, F. Chiaromonte, J. Kasturi, H. Petrykowska, B. Gibb, et al. Experimental validation of predicted mammalian erythroid cis-regulatory modules Genome Res., December 1, 2006; 16(12): 1480 - 1492. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y. Jeong, K. El-Jaick, E. Roessler, M. Muenke, and D. J. Epstein A functional screen for sonic hedgehog regulatory elements across a 1 Mb interval identifies long-range ventral forebrain enhancers Development, February 15, 2006; 133(4): 761 - 772. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Simons, M. Pheasant, I. V. Makunin, and J. S. Mattick Transposon-free regions in mammalian genomes Genome Res., February 1, 2006; 16(2): 164 - 172. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. A. Grice, E. S. Rochelle, E. D. Green, A. Chakravarti, and A. S. McCallion Evaluation of the RET regulatory landscape reveals the biological relevance of a HSCR-implicated enhancer Hum. Mol. Genet., December 15, 2005; 14(24): 3837 - 3845. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. Flaherty, B. Herron, and D. Symula Genomics of the future: Identification of quantitative trait loci in the mouse Genome Res., December 1, 2005; 15(12): 1741 - 1745. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Sironi, G. Menozzi, G. P. Comi, R. Cagliani, N. Bresolin, and U. Pozzoli Analysis of intronic conserved elements indicates that functional complexity might represent a major source of negative selection on non-coding sequences Hum. Mol. Genet., September 1, 2005; 14(17): 2533 - 2546. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Siepel, G. Bejerano, J. S. Pedersen, A. S. Hinrichs, M. Hou, K. Rosenbloom, H. Clawson, J. Spieth, L. W. Hillier, S. Richards, et al. Evolutionarily conserved elements in vertebrate, insect, worm, and yeast genomes Genome Res., August 1, 2005; 15(8): 1034 - 1050. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. W. Doniger, J. Huh, and J. C. Fay Identification of functional transcription factor binding sites using closely related Saccharomyces species Genome Res., May 1, 2005; 15(5): 701 - 709. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y. Wang and H. Jiang Identification of a Distal STAT5-binding DNA Region That May Mediate Growth Hormone Regulation of Insulin-like Growth Factor-I Gene Expression J. Biol. Chem., March 25, 2005; 280(12): 10955 - 10963. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				I. Ovcharenko, G. G. Loots, B. M. Giardine, M. Hou, J. Ma, R. C. Hardison, L. Stubbs, and W. Miller Mulan: Multiple-sequence local alignment and visualization for studying function and evolution Genome Res., January 1, 2005; 15(1): 184 - 194. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. Martin, S. Patel, and J. A. Segre Long-range comparison of human and mouse Sprr loci to identify conserved noncoding sequences involved in coordinate regulation Genome Res., December 1, 2004; 14(12): 2430 - 2438. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. Ahituv, E. M. Rubin, and M. A. Nobrega Exploiting human-fish genome comparisons for deciphering gene regulation Hum. Mol. Genet., October 1, 2004; 13(suppl_2): R261 - R266. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A.-M. Mallon, L. Wilming, J. Weekes, J. G.R. Gilbert, J. Ashurst, S. Peyrefitte, L. Matthews, M. Cadman, R. McKeone, C. A. Sellick, et al. Organization and Evolution of a Gene-Rich Region of the Mouse Genome: A 12.7-Mb Region Deleted in the Del(13)Svea36H Mouse Genome Res., October 1, 2004; 14(10a): 1888 - 1901. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. A. Frazer, L. Pachter, A. Poliakov, E. M. Rubin, and I. Dubchak VISTA: computational tools for comparative genomics Nucleic Acids Res., July 1, 2004; 32(suppl_2): W273 - W279. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Bejerano, M. Pheasant, I. Makunin, S. Stephen, W. J. Kent, J. S. Mattick, and D. Haussler Ultraconserved Elements in the Human Genome Science, May 28, 2004; 304(5675): 1321 - 1325. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]