Genome Research scroll

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Genome Res. 14:2424-2429, 2004
©2004 by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; ISSN 1088-9051/04 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Research Data
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dike, S.
Right arrow Articles by McCombie, W. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dike, S.
Right arrow Articles by McCombie, W. R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Letter

The mouse genome: Experimental examination of gene predictions and transcriptional start sites

Sujit Dike1, Vivekanand S. Balija1, Lidia U. Nascimento, Zhenyu Xuan, Jacqueline Ou, Theresa Zutavern, Lance E. Palmer, Greg Hannon, Michael Q. Zhang and W. Richard McCombie2

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, New York 11724, USA

The completion of the mouse and other mammalian genome sequences will provide necessary, but not sufficient, knowledge for an understanding of much of mouse biology at the molecular level. As a requisite next step in this process, the genes in mouse and their structure must be elucidated. In particular, knowledge of the transcriptional start site of these genes will be necessary for further study of their regulatory regions. To assess the current state of mouse genome annotation to support this activity, we identified several hundred gene predictions in mouse with varying levels of supporting evidence and tested them using RACE–PCR. Modifications were made to the procedure allowing pooling of RNA samples, resulting in a scaleable procedure. The results illustrate potential errors or omissions in the current 5' end annotations in 58% of the genes detected. In testing experimentally unsupported gene predictions, we were able to identify 58 that are not usually annotated as genes but produced spliced transcripts (~25% success rate). In addition, in many genes we were able to detect novel exons not predicted by any gene prediction algorithms. In 19.8% of the genes detected in this study, multiple transcript species were observed. These data show an urgent need to provide direct experimental validation of gene annotations. Moreover, these results show that direct validation using RACE–PCR can be an important component of genome-wide validation. This approach can be a useful tool in the ongoing efforts to increase the quality of gene annotations, especially transcriptional start sites, in complex genomes.


Article and publication are at http://www.genome.org/cgi/doi/10.1101/gr.3158304.

1 These authors contributed equally.

2 Corresponding author.
E-mail mccombie{at}cshl.org; fax (516) 367-8874.

[Supplemental material is available online at www.genome.org. The sequence data from this study have been submitted to dbEST/GenBank under accession nos. CV303589–CV309218.]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Genome Res.Home page
D. Baek, C. Davis, B. Ewing, D. Gordon, and P. Green
Characterization and predictive discovery of evolutionarily conserved mammalian alternative promoters
Genome Res., February 1, 2007; 17(2): 145 - 155.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Genome Res.Home page
J. L. Guenet
The mouse genome
Genome Res., December 1, 2005; 15(12): 1729 - 1740.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Genome Res.Home page
M. R. Brent
Genome annotation past, present, and future: How to define an ORF at each locus
Genome Res., December 1, 2005; 15(12): 1777 - 1786.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Genes Dev. Learn. Mem.
Protein Science RNA Genome Res.
Copyright © 2004 by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.