Genome Research scroll

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print September 13, 2004, 10.1101/gr.2663304
Genome Res. 14:1851-1860, 2004
©2004 by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; ISSN 1088-9051/04 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Research Data
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
gr.2663304v1
14/10a/1851    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zhao, S.
Right arrow Articles by Fraser, C. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zhao, S.
Right arrow Articles by Fraser, C. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Letter

Human, Mouse, and Rat Genome Large-Scale Rearrangements: Stability Versus Speciation

Shaying Zhao1,3, Jyoti Shetty1, Lihua Hou1, Arthur Delcher1, Baoli Zhu2, Kazutoyo Osoegawa2, Pieter de Jong2, William C. Nierman1, Robert L. Strausberg1 and Claire M. Fraser1

1 The Institute for Genomic Research, Rockville, Maryland 20850, USA 2 BACPAC Resources, Children's Hospital Oakland Research Institute, Oakland, California 94609, USA

Using paired-end sequences from bacterial artificial chromosomes, we have constructed high-resolution synteny and rearrangement breakpoint maps among human, mouse, and rat genomes. Among the >300 syntenic blocks identified are segments of over 40 Mb without any detected interspecies rearrangements, as well as regions with frequently broken synteny and extensive rearrangements. As closely related species, mouse and rat share the majority of the breakpoints and often have the same types of rearrangements when compared with the human genome. However, the breakpoints not shared between them indicate that mouse rearrangements are more often interchromosomal, whereas intrachromosomal rearrangements are more prominent in rat. Centromeres may have played a significant role in reorganizing a number of chromosomes in all three species. The comparison of the three species indicates that genome rearrangements follow a path that accommodates a delicate balance between maintaining a basic structure underlying all mammalian species and permitting variations that are necessary for speciation.


3 Corresponding author.
E-MAIL szhao{at}tigr.org; FAX (301) 838-0208.

[Supplemental material is available online at www.genome.org.]

Article and publication are at http://www.genome.org/cgi/doi/10.1101/gr.2663304. Article published online before print in September 2004.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Genome Res.Home page
E. Darai-Ramqvist, A. Sandlund, S. Muller, G. Klein, S. Imreh, and M. Kost-Alimova
Segmental duplications and evolutionary plasticity at tumor chromosome break-prone regions
Genome Res., March 1, 2008; 18(3): 370 - 379.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BioinformaticsHome page
G. Yi, S.-H. Sze, and M. R. Thon
Identifying clusters of functionally related genes in genomes
Bioinformatics, May 1, 2007; 23(9): 1053 - 1060.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
M. Semon and K. H. Wolfe
Rearrangement Rate following the Whole-Genome Duplication in Teleosts
Mol. Biol. Evol., March 1, 2007; 24(3): 860 - 867.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Genome Res.Home page
M. Rocchi, N. Archidiacono, and R. Stanyon
Ancestral genomes reconstruction: An integrated, multi-disciplinary approach is needed
Genome Res., December 1, 2006; 16(12): 1441 - 1444.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
R. G. Blazej, P. Kumaresan, and R. A. Mathies
From the Cover: Microfabricated bioprocessor for integrated nanoliter-scale Sanger DNA sequencing
PNAS, May 9, 2006; 103(19): 7240 - 7245.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
M. Kirkpatrick and N. Barton
Chromosome Inversions, Local Adaptation and Speciation
Genetics, May 1, 2006; 173(1): 419 - 434.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Mol GenetHome page
C. N. Dewey and L. Pachter
Evolution at the nucleotide level: the problem of multiple whole-genome alignment.
Hum. Mol. Genet., April 15, 2006; 15(suppl_1): R51 - R56.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
W. J. Murphy, D. M. Larkin, A. E.-v. der Wind, G. Bourque, G. Tesler, L. Auvil, J. E. Beever, B. P. Chowdhary, F. Galibert, L. Gatzke, et al.
Dynamics of Mammalian Chromosome Evolution Inferred from Multispecies Comparative Maps
Science, July 22, 2005; 309(5734): 613 - 617.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
D. Misceo, M. F. Cardone, L. Carbone, P. D'Addabbo, P. J. de Jong, M. Rocchi, and N. Archidiacono
Evolutionary History of Chromosome 20
Mol. Biol. Evol., February 1, 2005; 22(2): 360 - 366.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Genes Dev. Learn. Mem.
Protein Science RNA Genome Res.
Copyright © 2004 by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.