This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Supplemental Research Data All Versions of this Article: 827603v1 13/8/1889    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Lerat, E. Articles by Biémont, C. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Lerat, E. Articles by Biémont, C. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Letter

Sequence Divergence Within Transposable Element Families in the Drosophila melanogaster Genome

Laboratoire de Biométrie et Biologie Evolutive, Université Lyon 1, 69622 Villeurbanne cedex, France

The availability of the sequenced Drosophila melanogaster genome provides an opportunity to study sequence variation between copies within transposable element families. In this study,we analyzed the 624 copies of 22 transposable element (TE) families (14 LTR retrotransposons, five non-LTR retrotransposons, and three transposons). LTR and non-LTR retrotransposons possessed far fewer divergent elements than the transposons,suggesting that the difference depends on the transposition mechanism. However,there was not a continuous range of divergence of the copies in each class,which were either very similar to the canonical elements,or very divergent from them. This sequence homogeneity among TE family copies matches the theoretical models of the dynamics of these repeated sequences. The sequenced Drosophila genome thus appears to be composed of a mixture of TEs that are still active and of ancient relics that have degenerated and the distribution of which along the chromosomes results from natural selection. This clearly demonstrates that the TEs are highly active within the genome,suggesting that the genetic variability of the Drosophila genome is still being renewed by the action of TEs.

¹ Corresponding author. E-MAIL biemont{at}biomserv.univ-lyon1.fr; FAX: (33) 4 78 89 27 19.

[Supplemental material is available online at www.genome.org.]

Article published online before print in July 2003.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. Casola, A. M. Lawing, E. Betran, and C. Feschotte PIF-like Transposons are Common in Drosophila and Have Been Repeatedly Domesticated to Generate New Host Genes Mol. Biol. Evol., August 1, 2007; 24(8): 1872 - 1888. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. M. Bergman and D. Bensasson Recent LTR retrotransposon insertion contrasts with waves of non-LTR insertion since speciation in Drosophila melanogaster PNAS, July 3, 2007; 104(27): 11340 - 11345. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. P. Garcia Guerreiro and A. Fontdevila The Evolutionary History of Drosophila buzzatii. XXXVI. Molecular Structural Analysis of Osvaldo Retrotransposon Insertions in Colonizing Populations Unveils Drift Effects in Founder Events Genetics, January 1, 2007; 175(1): 301 - 310. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H.-P. Yang, T.-L. Hung, T.-L. You, and T.-H. Yang Genomewide Comparative Analysis of the Highly Abundant Transposable Element DINE-1 Suggests a Recent Transpositional Burst in Drosophila yakuba Genetics, May 1, 2006; 173(1): 189 - 196. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Caspi and L. Pachter Identification of transposable elements using multiple alignments of related genomes Genome Res., February 1, 2006; 16(2): 260 - 270. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Boulesteix, M. Weiss, and C. Biemont Differences in Genome Size Between Closely Related Species: The Drosophila melanogaster Species Subgroup Mol. Biol. Evol., January 1, 2006; 23(1): 162 - 167. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Ashburner and C. M. Bergman Drosophila melanogaster: A case study of a model genomic sequence and its consequences Genome Res., December 1, 2005; 15(12): 1661 - 1667. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. Mugnier, C. Biemont, and C. Vieira New Regulatory Regions of Drosophila 412 Retrotransposable Element Generated by Recombination Mol. Biol. Evol., March 1, 2005; 22(3): 747 - 757. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. M. C. Tubio, H. Naveira, and J. Costas Structural and Evolutionary Analyses of the Ty3/gypsy Group of LTR Retrotransposons in the Genome of Anopheles gambiae Mol. Biol. Evol., January 1, 2005; 22(1): 29 - 39. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]