Genome Research

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print April 14, 2003, 10.1101/gr.678303
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
GR-6783Rv1
13/5/991    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Martín, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Dopazo, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Martín, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Dopazo, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Vol 13, Issue 5, 991-998, May 2003

METHODS

Comparing Bacterial Genomes Through Conservation Profiles

Maria J. Martín1, Javier Herrero2, Alvaro Mateos2 and Joaquin Dopazo2,3

1EMBL Outstation—The European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge, CB10 1SD, UK;2 Bioinformatics Unit, Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Oncológicas (CNIO), Melchor Fernández Almagro 3, 28029 Madrid, Spain

We constructed two-dimensional representations of profiles of gene conservation across different genomes using the genome of Escherichia coli as a model. These profiles permit both the visualization at the genome level of different traits in the organism studied and, at the same time, reveal features related to the genomes analyzed (such as defective genomes or genomes that lack a particular system). Conserved genes are not uniformly distributed along the E. coli genome but tend to cluster together. The study of gene distribution patterns across genomes is important for the understanding of how sets of genes seem to be dependent on each other, probably having some functional link. This provides additional evidence that can be used for the elucidation of the function of unannotated genes. Clustering these patterns produces families of genes which can be arranged in a hierarchy of closeness. In this way, functions can be defined at different levels of generality depending on the level of the hierarchy that is studied. The combined study of conservation and phenotypic traits opens up the possibility of defining phenotype/genotype associations, and ultimately inferring the gene or genes responsible for a particular trait.


3 Corresponding author.

E-MAIL jdopazo{at}cnio.es; FAX +34 912246972.

Article and publication are at http://www.genome.org/cgi/doi/10.1101/gr.678303. Article published online before print in April 2003.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Genome ResHome page
M. Campillos, C. von Mering, L. J. Jensen, and P. Bork
Identification and analysis of evolutionarily cohesive functional modules in protein networks
Genome Res., March 1, 2006; 16(3): 374 - 382.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Genome ResHome page
K. Jim, K. Parmar, M. Singh, and S. Tavazoie
A Cross-Genomic Approach for Systematic Mapping of Phenotypic Traits to Genes
Genome Res., January 1, 2004; 14(1): 109 - 115.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Genes Dev. Learn. Mem.
Protein Science RNA Genome Res.