Genome Research cityscape

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print April 14, 2003, 10.1101/gr.440803
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
GR-4408v1
13/5/896    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by King, O. D.
Right arrow Articles by Roth, F. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by King, O. D.
Right arrow Articles by Roth, F. P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Vol 13, Issue 5, 896-904, May 2003

METHODS

Predicting Gene Function From Patterns of Annotation

Oliver D. King1, Rebecca E. Foulger2, Selina S. Dwight3, James V. White4,5 and Frederick P. Roth1,6

1Department of Biological Chemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA;2 FlyBase, Department of Genetics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 3EH, England; 3Department of Genetics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California 94305-5120, USA; 4JVWhite.Com, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA; 5Department of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, USA

The Gene Ontology (GO) Consortium has produced a controlled vocabulary for annotation of gene function that is used in many organism-specific gene annotation databases. This allows the prediction of gene function based on patterns of annotation. For example, if annotations for two attributes tend to occur together in a database, then a gene holding one attribute is likely to hold the other as well. We modeled the relationships among GO attributes with decision trees and Bayesian networks, using the annotations in the Saccharomyces Genome Database (SGD) and in FlyBase as training data. We tested the models using cross-validation, and we manually assessed 100 gene–attribute associations that were predicted by the models but that were not present in the SGD or FlyBase databases. Of the 100 manually assessed associations, 41 were judged to be true, and another 42 were judged to be plausible.

[Detailed lists of hypotheses including the curators' comments on each hypothesis, are available at http://llama.med.harvard.edu/~king/predictions.html.]


6 Corresponding author.

E-MAIL froth{at}hms.Harvard.edu; FAX (617) 432-3557.

Article and publication are at http://www.genome.org/cgi/doi/10.1101/gr.440803. Article published online before print in April 2003.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BioinformaticsHome page
Y. Tao, L. Sam, J. Li, C. Friedman, and Y. A. Lussier
Information theory applied to the sparse gene ontology annotation network to predict novel gene function
Bioinformatics, July 1, 2007; 23(13): i529 - i538.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BioinformaticsHome page
S. Myhre, H. Tveit, T. Mollestad, and A. Laegreid
Additional Gene Ontology structure for improved biological reasoning
Bioinformatics, August 15, 2006; 22(16): 2020 - 2027.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Toxicol SciHome page
D. R. Boverhof and T. R. Zacharewski
Toxicogenomics in Risk Assessment: Applications and Needs
Toxicol. Sci., February 1, 2006; 89(2): 352 - 360.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
Gene Ontology Consortium
The Gene Ontology (GO) project in 2006
Nucleic Acids Res., January 1, 2006; 34(suppl_1): D322 - D326.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BioinformaticsHome page
P. Khatri and S. Draghici
Ontological analysis of gene expression data: current tools, limitations, and open problems
Bioinformatics, September 15, 2005; 21(18): 3587 - 3595.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BioinformaticsHome page
P. Khatri, B. Done, A. Rao, A. Done, and S. Draghici
A semantic analysis of the annotations of the human genome
Bioinformatics, August 15, 2005; 21(16): 3416 - 3421.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Mol GenetHome page
P. N. Robinson, U. Bohme, R. Lopez, S. Mundlos, and P. Nurnberg
Gene-Ontology analysis reveals association of tissue-specific 5' CpG-island genes with development and embryogenesis
Hum. Mol. Genet., September 1, 2004; 13(17): 1969 - 1978.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
E. Camon, M. Magrane, D. Barrell, V. Lee, E. Dimmer, J. Maslen, D. Binns, N. Harte, R. Lopez, and R. Apweiler
The Gene Ontology Annotation (GOA) Database: sharing knowledge in Uniprot with Gene Ontology
Nucleic Acids Res., January 1, 2004; 32(90001): D262 - 266.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Genes Dev. Learn. Mem.
Protein Science RNA Genome Res.