This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Supplemental Research Data Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Ushijima, T. Articles by Miyamoto, K. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Ushijima, T. Articles by Miyamoto, K. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

LETTER

Fidelity of the Methylation Pattern and Its Variation in the Genome

¹Carcinogenesis Division, National Cancer Center Research Institute, Chuo-ku, Tokyo 104-0045, Japan

The methylated or unmethylated status of a CpG site is copied faithfully from parental DNA to daughter DNA, and functions as a cellular memory. However, no information is available for the fidelity of methylation pattern in unmethylated CpG islands (CGIs) or its variation in the genome. Here, we determined the methylation status of each CpG site on each DNA molecule obtained from clonal populations of normal human mammary epithelial cells. Methylation pattern error rates (MPERs) were calculated based upon the deviation from the methylation patterns that should be obtained if the cells had 100% fidelity in replicating the methylation pattern. Unmethylated CGIs in the promoter regions of five genes showed MPERs of 0.018–0.032 errors/site/21.6 generations, and the fidelity of methylation pattern was calculated as 99.85%–99.92%/site/generation. In contrast, unmethylated CGIs outside the promoter regions showed MPERs more than twice as high (P < 0.01). Methylated regions, including a CGI in the MAGE-A3 promoter and DMR of the H19 gene, showed much lower MPERs than unmethylated CGIs. These showed that errors in methylation pattern were mainly due to de novo methylations in unmethylated regions. The differential MPERs even among unmethylated CGIs indicated that a promoter-specific protection mechanism(s) from de novo methylation was present.

[Supplemental material is available online at www.genome.org.]

E-MAIL tushijim{at}ncc.go.jp; FAX 81-3-5565-1753.

Article and publication are at http://www.genome.org/cgi/doi/10.1101/gr.969603.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				X. Zhu, S. L. Asa, and S. Ezzat Fibroblast Growth Factor 2 and Estrogen Control the Balance of Histone 3 Modifications Targeting MAGE-A3 in Pituitary Neoplasia Clin. Cancer Res., April 1, 2008; 14(7): 1984 - 1996. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Bock and T. Lengauer Computational epigenetics Bioinformatics, January 1, 2008; 24(1): 1 - 10. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				I. Suetake, D. Hayata, and S. Tajima The Amino-Terminus of Mouse DNA Methyltransferase 1 Forms an Independent Domain and Binds to DNA with the Sequence Involving PCNA Binding Motif J. Biochem., December 1, 2006; 140(6): 763 - 776. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Miyamoto and T. Ushijima Diagnostic and Therapeutic Applications of Epigenetics Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol., June 1, 2005; 35(6): 293 - 301. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. P. Genereux, B. E. Miner, C. T. Bergstrom, and C. D. Laird A population-epigenetic model to infer site-specific methylation rates from double-stranded DNA methylation patterns PNAS, April 19, 2005; 102(16): 5802 - 5807. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Abe, M. Ohira, A. Kaneda, Y. Yagi, S. Yamamoto, Y. Kitano, T. Takato, A. Nakagawara, and T. Ushijima CpG Island Methylator Phenotype Is a Strong Determinant of Poor Prognosis in Neuroblastomas Cancer Res., February 1, 2005; 65(3): 828 - 834. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Vilkaitis, I. Suetake, S. Klimasauskas, and S. Tajima Processive Methylation of Hemimethylated CpG Sites by Mouse Dnmt1 DNA Methyltransferase J. Biol. Chem., January 7, 2005; 280(1): 64 - 72. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Ushijima, N. Watanabe, K. Shimizu, K. Miyamoto, T. Sugimura, and A. Kaneda Decreased Fidelity in Replicating CpG Methylation Patterns in Cancer Cells Cancer Res., January 1, 2005; 65(1): 11 - 17. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. D. Riggs and Z. Xiong Methylation and epigenetic fidelity PNAS, January 6, 2004; 101(1): 4 - 5. [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. D. Laird, N. D. Pleasant, A. D. Clark, J. L. Sneeden, K. M. A. Hassan, N. C. Manley, J. C. Vary Jr., T. Morgan, R. S. Hansen, and R. Stoger From The Cover: Hairpin-bisulfite PCR: Assessing epigenetic methylation patterns on complementary strands of individual DNA molecules PNAS, January 6, 2004; 101(1): 204 - 209. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]