This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Supplemental Research Data Correction Erratum (v16,p557) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Newman, T. Articles by Trask, B. J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Newman, T. Articles by Trask, B. J. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Complex Evolution of 7E Olfactory Receptor Genes in Segmental Duplications

Division of Human Biology, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington 98109, USA; Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA

Large segmental duplications (SDs) constitute at least 3.6% of the human genome and have increased its size, complexity, and diversity. SDs can mediate ectopic sequence exchange resulting in gross chromosomal rearrangements that could contribute to speciation and disease. We have identified and evaluated a subset of human SDs that harbor an 88-member subfamily of olfactory receptor (OR)-like genes called the 7Es. At least 92% of these genes appear to be pseudogenes when compared to other OR genes. The 7E-containing SDs (7E SDs) have duplicated to at least 35 regions of the genome via intra- and interchromosomal duplication events. In contrast to many human SDs, the 7E SDs are not biased towards pericentromeric or subtelomeric regions. We find evidence for gene conversion among 7E genes and larger sequence exchange between 7E SDs, supporting the hypothesis that long, highly similar stretches of DNA facilitate ectopic interactions. The complex structure and history of the 7E SDs necessitates extension of the current model of large-scale DNA duplication. Despite their appearance as pseudogenes, some 7E genes exhibit a signature of purifying selection, and at least one 7E gene is expressed.

[Supplemental material is available online at www.genome.org.]

EMAIL btrask{at}fhcrc.org; FAX 206-667-4023.

Article and publication are at http://www.genome.org/cgi/doi/10.1101/gr.769003.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A.-S. Fiston-Lavier, D. Anxolabehere, and H. Quesneville A model of segmental duplication formation in Drosophila melanogaster Genome Res., October 1, 2007; 17(10): 1458 - 1470. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Shi and J. Zhang Comparative genomic analysis identifies an evolutionary shift of vomeronasal receptor gene repertoires in the vertebrate transition from water to land Genome Res., February 1, 2007; 17(2): 166 - 174. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. A. Chapman, J. E. Bowers, F. A. Feltus, and A. H. Paterson Buffering of crucial functions by paleologous duplicated genes may contribute cyclicality to angiosperm genome duplication PNAS, February 21, 2006; 103(8): 2730 - 2735. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y. Gilad, O. Man, and G. Glusman A comparison of the human and chimpanzee olfactory receptor gene repertoires Genome Res., February 1, 2005; 15(2): 224 - 230. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. P. Noonan, J. Grimwood, J. Schmutz, M. Dickson, and R. M. Myers Gene Conversion and the Evolution of Protocadherin Gene Cluster Diversity Genome Res., March 1, 2004; 14(3): 354 - 366. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]