Genome Research Attend a BioResearch Product Faire

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print October 14, 2003, 10.1101/gr.1190803
Genome Res. 13:2444-2449, 2003
©2003 by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; ISSN 1088-9051/03 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
1190803v1
13/11/2444    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jensen, L. J.
Right arrow Articles by Brunak, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jensen, L. J.
Right arrow Articles by Brunak, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Letter

Functionality of System Components: Conservation of Protein Function in Protein Feature Space

Lars Juhl Jensen, David W. Ussery and Søren Brunak1

Center for Biological Sequence Analysis, BioCentrum-DTU, The Technical University of Denmark, DK-2800 Lyngby, Denmark

Many protein features useful for prediction of protein function can be predicted from sequence, including posttranslational modifications, subcellular localization, and physical/chemical properties. We show here that such protein features are more conserved among orthologs than paralogs, indicating they are crucial for protein function and thus subject to selective pressure. This means that a function prediction method based on sequence-derived features may be able to discriminate between proteins with different function even when they have highly similar structure. Also, such a method is likely to perform well on organisms other than the one on which it was trained. We evaluate the performance of such a method, ProtFun, which relies on protein features as its sole input, and show that the method gives similar performance for most eukaryotes and performs much better than anticipated on archaea and bacteria. From this analysis, we conclude that for the posttranslational modifications studied, both the cellular use and the sequence motifs are conserved within Eukarya.


1 Corresponding author.
E-MAIL brunak{at}cbs.dtu.dk; FAX 45-45-931585.

Article and publication are at http://www.genome.org/cgi/doi/10.1101/gr.1190803. Article published online before print in October 2003.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum Mol GenetHome page
G. A. Reeves, J. M. Thornton, and the BioSapiens Network of Excellence
Integrating biological data through the genome
Hum. Mol. Genet., April 15, 2006; 15(suppl_1): R81 - R87.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Genes Dev. Learn. Mem.
Protein Science RNA Genome Res.
Copyright © 2003 by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.