Genome Research

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Metzgar, D.
Right arrow Articles by Wills, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Metzgar, D.
Right arrow Articles by Wills, C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Vol. 12, Issue 3, 408-413, March 2002

LETTER
Domain-Level Differences in Microsatellite Distribution and Content Result from Different Relative Rates of Insertion and Deletion Mutations

David Metzgar,1,4,5 Li Liu,2 Christian Hansen,1 Kevin Dybvig,2 and Christopher Wills1,3

1 Division of Biology and 3 Center for Molecular Genetics, University of California at San Diego, San Diego, California 92093-0116, USA; 2 Department of Genomics and Pathobiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama 35294, USA

Microsatellites (short tandem polynucleotide repeats) are found throughout eukaryotic genomes at frequencies many orders of magnitude higher than the frequencies predicted to occur by chance. Most of these microsatellites appear to have evolved in a generally neutral manner. In contrast, microsatellites are generally absent from bacterial genomes except in locations where they provide adaptive functional variability, and these appear to have evolved under selection. We demonstrate a mutational bias towards deletion (repeat contraction) in a native chromosomal microsatellite of the bacterium Mycoplasma gallisepticum, through the collection and analysis of independent mutations in the absence of natural selection. Using this and similar existing data from two other bacterial species and four eukaryotic species, we find strong evidence that deletion biases resulting in repeat contraction are common in bacteria, while eukaryotic microsatellites generally experience unbiased mutation or a bias towards insertion (repeat expansion). This difference in mutational bias suggests that eukaryotic microsatellites should generally expand wherever selection does not exclude them, whereas bacterial microsatellites should be driven to extinction by mutational pressure wherever they are not maintained by selection. This is consistent with observed bacterial and eukaryotic microsatellite distributions. Hence, mutational biases that differ between eukaryotes and bacteria can account for many of the observed differences in microsatellite DNA content and distribution found in these two groups of organisms.


4 Present address: Mail Code BCC-379, The Scripps Research Institute, 10550 North Torrey Pines Rd., La Jolla, CA 92037, USA.

5 Corresponding author.


12:408-413 ©2002 by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press  ISSN 1088-9051/02 $5.00

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
S. Archak, E. Meduri, P. S. Kumar, and J. Nagaraju
InSatDb: a microsatellite database of fully sequenced insect genomes
Nucleic Acids Res., January 12, 2007; 35(suppl_1): D36 - D39.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
J. Mrazek
Analysis of Distribution Indicates Diverse Functions of Simple Sequence Repeats in Mycoplasma Genomes
Mol. Biol. Evol., July 1, 2006; 23(7): 1370 - 1385.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J HeredHome page
M. Perez, F. Cruz, and P. Presa
Distribution Properties of Polymononucleotide Repeats in Molluscan Genomes
J. Hered., January 1, 2005; 96(1): 40 - 51.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Genes Dev. Learn. Mem.
Protein Science RNA Genome Res.