Genome Research scroll

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print February 8, 2001, 10.1101/gr.GR1644R
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
GR1644Rv1
11/3/441    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nakane, J.
Right arrow Articles by Davis, R. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nakane, J.
Right arrow Articles by Davis, R. W.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Vol. 11, Issue 3, 441-447, March 2001

METHODS
A Method For Parallel, Automated, Thermal Cycling of Submicroliter Samples

Jonathan Nakane,1 David Broemeling,1 Roger Donaldson,1 Andre Marziali,1,3 Thomas D. Willis,2 Matthew O'Keefe,2 and Ronald W. Davis2

1 Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver V6T 1Z1, Canada; 2 Stanford DNA Sequencing and Technology Center, Palo Alto, California 94304, USA

A large fraction of the cost of DNA sequencing and other DNA-analysis processes results from the reagent costs incurred during cycle sequencing or PCR. In particular, the high cost of the enzymes and dyes used in these processes often results in thermal cycling costs exceeding $0.50 per sample. In the case of high-throughput DNA sequencing, this is a significant and unnecessary expense. Improved detection efficiency of new sequencing instrumentation allows the reaction volumes for cycle sequencing to be scaled down to one-tenth of presently used volumes, resulting in at least a 10-fold decrease in the cost of this process. However, commercially available thermal cyclers and automated reaction setup devices have inherent design limitations which make handling volumes of <1 µL extremely difficult. In this paper, we describe a method for thermal cycling aimed at reliable, automated cycling of submicroliter reaction volumes.


3 Corresponding author.


11:441-447 ©2001 by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press  ISSN 1088-9051/01 $5.00

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
R. G. Blazej, P. Kumaresan, and R. A. Mathies
From the Cover: Microfabricated bioprocessor for integrated nanoliter-scale Sanger DNA sequencing
PNAS, May 9, 2006; 103(19): 7240 - 7245.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Genes Dev. Learn. Mem.
Protein Science RNA Genome Res.