|
Vol. 10, Issue 12, 1878-1889, December 2000
Comparative Genome Analysis of the Mouse Imprinted Gene Impact and Its Nonimprinted Human Homolog IMPACT: Toward the Structural Basis for Species-Specific Imprinting
Kohji
Okamura,1,6
Yuriko
Hagiwara-Takeuchi,1,6
Tao
Li,2
Thanh H.
Vu,2
Momoki
Hirai,3
Masahira
Hattori,4
Yoshiyuki
Sakaki,1,4
Andrew R.
Hoffman,2,7 and
Takashi
Ito1,5,7
1 Human Genome Center, Institute of Medical Science,
University of Tokyo, Tokyo 108-8639, Japan; 2 VA Palo Alto
Health Care System and Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo
Alto, California 94304, USA; 3 Department of Integrated
Biosciences, Graduate School of Frontier Sciences, University of Tokyo,
Tokyo 113-0033, Japan; 4 Human Genome Research Group, RIKEN
Genomic Sciences Center, Wako, Saitama 351-0198, Japan;
5 Division of Genome Biology, Cancer Research Institute,
Kanazawa University, Kanazawa 920-0934, Japan
Mouse Impact is a paternally expressed gene encoding an
evolutionarily conserved protein of unknown function. Here we
identified IMPACT, the human homolog of Impact, on
chromosome 18q11.2-12.1, a region syntenic to the mouse
Impact locus. IMPACT was expressed biallelically in
brain and in various tissues from two informative fetuses and in
peripheral blood from an informative adult. To reveal the structural
basis for the difference in allelic expression between the two species,
we elucidated complete genome sequences for both mouse Impact
(~38 kb) and human IMPACT (~30 kb). Sequence comparison
revealed that the two genes share a well-conserved exon-intron
organization but bear significantly different CpG islands. The mouse
island lies in the first intron and contains characteristic tandem
repeats. Furthermore, this island serves as a differentially methylated
region (DMR) consisting of a hypermethylated maternal allele and an
unmethylated paternal allele. Intriguingly, this intronic island is
missing from the nonimprinted human IMPACT, whose sole CpG
island spans the first exon, lacks any apparent repeats, and escapes
methylation on both chromosomes. These results suggest that the
intronic DMR plays a role in the imprinting of Impact.
[The sequence data described in this paper
have been submitted to the DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank data library under
accession nos. AB026264, AF232228, and AF232229.]
6
These authors contributed equally to this work.
7
Corresponding authors.
10:1878-1889 ©2000 by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press ISSN 1088-9051/00 $5.00

CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Hiura, Y. Obata, J. Komiyama, M. Shirai, and T. Kono
Oocyte growth-dependent progression of maternal imprinting in mice
Genes Cells,
April 1, 2006;
11(4):
353 - 361.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. A. Johnstone, A. J. DuBose, C. R. Futtner, M. D. Elmore, C. I. Brannan, and J. L. Resnick
A human imprinting centre demonstrates conserved acquisition but diverged maintenance of imprinting in a mouse model for Angelman syndrome imprinting defects
Hum. Mol. Genet.,
February 1, 2006;
15(3):
393 - 404.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Yokomine, H. Shirohzu, W. Purbowasito, A. Toyoda, H. Iwama, K. Ikeo, T. Hori, S. Mizuno, M. Tsudzuki, Y.-i. Matsuda, et al.
Structural and functional analysis of a 0.5-Mb chicken region orthologous to the imprinted mammalian Ascl2/Mash2-Igf2-H19 region
Genome Res.,
January 1, 2005;
15(1):
154 - 165.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Y. Galperin and E. V. Koonin
'Conserved hypothetical' proteins: prioritization of targets for experimental study
Nucleic Acids Res.,
October 12, 2004;
32(18):
5452 - 5463.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Lewis, K. Mitsuya, M. Constancia, and W. Reik
Tandem Repeat Hypothesis in Imprinting: Deletion of a Conserved Direct Repeat Element Upstream of H19 Has No Effect on Imprinting in the Igf2-H19 Region
Mol. Cell. Biol.,
July 1, 2004;
24(13):
5650 - 5656.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. D. Tsuchiya, J. M. Greally, Y. Yi, K. P. Noel, J.-P. Truong, and C. M. Disteche
Comparative Sequence and X-Inactivation Analyses of a Domain of Escape in Human Xp11.2 and the Conserved Segment in Mouse
Genome Res.,
July 1, 2004;
14(7):
1275 - 1284.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. Yamada, H. Watanabe, F. Miura, H. Soejima, M. Uchiyama, T. Iwasaka, T. Mukai, Y. Sakaki, and T. Ito
A Comprehensive Analysis of Allelic Methylation Status of CpG Islands on Human Chromosome 21q
Genome Res.,
February 1, 2004;
14(2):
247 - 266.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Walter and M. Paulsen
The potential role of gene duplications in the evolution of imprinting mechanisms
Hum. Mol. Genet.,
October 15, 2003;
12(90002):
R215 - 220.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Coombes, P. Arnaud, E. Gordon, W. Dean, E. A. Coar, C. M. Williamson, R. Feil, J. Peters, and G. Kelsey
Epigenetic Properties and Identification of an Imprint Mark in the Nesp-Gnasxl Domain of the Mouse Gnas Imprinted Locus
Mol. Cell. Biol.,
August 15, 2003;
23(16):
5475 - 5488.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Arnaud, D. Monk, M. Hitchins, E. Gordon, W. Dean, C. V. Beechey, J. Peters, W. Craigen, M. Preece, P. Stanier, et al.
Conserved methylation imprints in the human and mouse GRB10 genes with divergent allelic expression suggests differential reading of the same mark
Hum. Mol. Genet.,
May 1, 2003;
12(9):
1005 - 1019.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
I. Marin and A. Ferrus
Comparative Genomics of the RBR Family, Including the Parkinson's Disease-Related Gene Parkin and the Genes of the Ariadne Subfamily
Mol. Biol. Evol.,
December 1, 2002;
19(12):
2039 - 2050.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Paulsen, S. Takada, N. A. Youngson, M. Benchaib, C. Charlier, K. Segers, M. Georges, and A. C. Ferguson-Smith
Comparative Sequence Analysis of the Imprinted Dlk1-Gtl2 Locus in Three Mammalian Species Reveals Highly Conserved Genomic Elements and Refines Comparison with the Igf2-H19 Region
Genome Res.,
December 1, 2001;
11(12):
2085 - 2094.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Kubota, K. Ota, Y. Sakaki, and T. Ito
Budding Yeast GCN1 Binds the GI Domain to Activate the eIF2alpha Kinase GCN2
J. Biol. Chem.,
May 11, 2001;
276(20):
17591 - 17596.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|